David Icke suggests that the moon is not real, that it is used to control us. I’m sure in any of his books you could find this information in some detail, although I don’t know if this has anything to do with clouds going behind the moon. ~J
Uploaded by cemiananka25 on Nov 5, 2009
The key to this mystery is simple……it’s Moon Shine. The guy had far too much moonshine with his breakfast !
“Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance” Albert Einstein
When I first posted this idea, all I was saying was that I seen it with my own eyes. If one has done any investigation into project bluebeam, and watching the skies at night, they would understand that those who say the moon is a hologram believe that it is a plausible explination as to how those coulds and object in the sky could be faked. Watching the night skies for over the last year, I have seen many things that just don’t add up to what we’ve been taught to believe as true and knowing they are constantly spraying the skies with foreign substances that are able to make the sky into a giant screen give me some ideas to believe this “could be” possible” that what we see is nothing but an illusion. We all after all know that everything is hidden from us, so who’s to say that they aren’t hiding what’s “out there” from us also.
I find this story nomore crazy than I do those that believe there are buildings and spaceships on the moon
I will now just keep watching, and chalk this story up to taking with a grain of salt like I do every other story online that I read because most of the time I just don’t give a damn.
I, for one, loved your story. It got the creative juices flowing. As far as I’m concerned, there’s two kinds of righteous stories, the educational news type, and the thought provoking type. Your falls well within these parameters. I also believe that you saw something you weren’t meant to see and I support you. Funny how people could swallow the idea of a planetary size space craft, but one a 1/4 of its size is laughingly out of the question. Unlike Michael, I was not here 300,000 years ago to know for sure if the moon is real, or a dumbing-down instrument. Enjoy the day….
Stories are nice. Stories are fun. Stories are….stories. You don’t need to have been here 300,000 years ago to be sure that the moon is real. If you trust the laws of physics, and the laws of optics, and the view through a 500 power telescope, you will conclude that our planet has a satellite approximately one-sixth its size about 225,000 miles away. If you want to apply those laws to the theory of phony-moons-below-the-clouds, you will have to hypothesize about a thousand different phony moons floating at altitudes of around 10,000 feet (because after all, lets remember, the CLOUDS ARE BEHIND THEM!) which would be the number called for given that any object hovering at such low altitude would be visible only to an area approximately the size of greater Chicago! You want to go with the “blue ray” theory? Fine – draw it out to its logical conclusion of some thousands of widely dispersed blue ray machines spaced at geographically precise intervals around the world simultaneously projecting the phases of a phony moon for thousands of years going back to the dawn of mankinds observation of the skies….and then please proceed to some kind of logical explanation as to the usefulness of this absurdly unsustainable network of drive-in movie showbiz?
We are not here for “stories.” Or did I mistakenly stumble onto a sci-fi site? We are concerned here with issues pertaining to the life or death of billions, we are here to gather information on the takedown of a deadly foe, we are here to separate the wheat from the chaff in search of authentic information. This “story” does not even qualify as chaff. If we’re in a granary (and I have spent many hours in a granary) , I would immediately categorize this “story” as neither wheat nor chaff, but clearly as a smidgen of mouse-dung. I, for one, am not here to entertain patent absurdity….so this, my friends, is my last word on the subject.
Sheesh!
Michael
Michael, I’ve had to back off from this discussion, because I wonder what it’s for – but I think I need to clarify what David icke saya about that moon. in general, he shares that the moon is not a natural planet. There is a big difference between saying it’s not real and it’s a manmade device of some sort. Hugs, ~Jean
I’ll say what I want, when I want and without your approval, Michael. And I am not here to make sure your friends don’t get embarrassed because I don’t care what other people think of me anymore, especially the stuffy ones with their noses in the clouds. If I want to dream along with LoveForLife, I will do precisely that regardless of your approval/disapproval – and if something doesn’t make scientific hard sense to you, than that’s too bad. You may not believe this, but it’s not all about you and your sensitivities. I am not here for your entertainment, your edification, or your insulate attitude. One confused and curious soul gets a little attention and you wanna take your ball and go home…..I am as serious as the next person and am here for serious business, but there’s nothing wrong with occasional lightheartedness when needed. I will not step on people like you do, I try and assure them with like minded impressions and am careful of their feelings. Giving is harder than taking…try it sometime. Can we move on now?….or is a last word really necessary….? I do not wish to soil Jean’s site any further, so anything else you say will pass unmolested.
Love and light to you brother…Patience and understanding…
please don’t transform me back into “John E. Infidel”
BlueRay
Dear Blue,
I apologize and am sorry for any misunderstanding or unintended offense.
Michael
Well, it seems I have missed the main lesson here, which is, as always, about how much love and understanding we bring to the world. As I wrote my smart-butt comments above, I fondly and foolishly imagined (as I am prone to do) that a tone of light-hearted whimsy would somehow convey itself, woven within and through my somewhat acerbic remarks, rendering them amusing and harmless. Wrong. On re-reading, I am chagrined and sorry to see that Blue Ray is indeed quite correct, and my comments read as needlessly harsh and dismissive.
My apologies to “C” and all….yes, let’s get back to the Ascension vibration….:)
Michael
I love you, brother, and am always here for you too…..well said, and off to ascention we go…
with all my respect
Blue Ray
It’s increasingly a source of discouragement, these days, having to discern between honesty and disinformation when evaluating “truth movement” content on the internet, especially when you consider that the shift towards the internet was largely brought about by the lack of credibility in mainstream reporting. Therefore, it further aggravates the confusion around us when poorly researched comments are posted in the reply section. The simple dissemination of this video has already been dealt with adequately. Thin cloud cover behaves transparently in front of a bright moon and a low altitude hologram would have to be duplicated thousands of times across the night sky to be visible from all ground locations – also resulting in the sighting of multiple moons of different sizes from those locations. The allegations made in this video do not mirror David Icke’s explanation of the moon’s true character and purpose. It’s been suggested elsewhere on the internet, that the moon has been removed and replaced by a hologram but for this to be feasible the position of the hologram would absolutely have to correspond with the true co-ordinates of the physical moon. I’m not necessarily supporting this idea but if this suggestion taxes your reality construct to the point of ridicule, I would suggest taking a thorough look at some of the newest ideas about the moon’s ancient origins – including David Icke’s work on the subject.
I’m with u., Henry….
Does seem a bit nonsensical to waste readers time with this but….Why drag David Ickes into this? Obviously, the moon looks different depending on where you are and the clouds between you and the moon. As for his assertions about the moon… There are others who say the same things he says. I like David Icke and I’m thankful for his contributions to our understanding. No one is perfectly right about everything yet. We are ALL in the learning curve..and grateful to be here. Peace.
Lol! Jean this is getting hot! Well I guess I need to say this…Hi, I have to say that not because Jean has post these videos … mean that it goes against the purpose of the site. Sometimes weird news may bring a new panorama from our planet to us, and not necessarily has to be a negative one. Everything that is new to our senses is good. It means to me that our planet and even us are experiencing changes or that we “for some reason” are opening our eyes to this magic Earth and becoming more aware of our position on this Earth and maybe the Universe.
Once there was an article in which it talked about the clouds. In it is said that “the clouds were getting closer to the ground than before” or the normal position of the clouds. Apparently this is happening for some reasons, and by now they probably have the answer; but I never follow it.
Well, the purpose of this video I shared with Jean is because I find it curious that all of a sudden more people are noticing strange behavior of the Moon etc., and the clouds around it. It has not been my idea, but once I a while we all experience strange inexplicable things that most of the time people who don’t want to be call “crazy or loony don’t talk about it; … but I really don’t mind being call things because internet is getting worst than the physical reality. I have been called many things, but it is up to them to behave the way they do. Someday they will encounter strange things also and will want to talk about them, and then their journey through the honey road will start.
And going back with the “Clouds behind the Moon” it is good to notice this, because this is telling me that good things will be happening. And if for some reason we have a fake Moon, which I don’t believe so, maybe it has been made for us not to get in confusion until we accept that our universe is changing and our earth will change too. And who else also?
Thank you Jean
This proves just how gonzo people can let themselves get. What makes more sense? The thin clouds let the moon shine through. Big thick ones do not. It is an illusion.
Is it David Icke ? I don’t think so… this focus on a fake Moon has apparead very recently, it seem as if all of a sudden… I immediatly asked myself : what is the real purpose here ? It is as if one wants us to go and use energy on the topic, maybe to divert our attention.
And if it is so, the best we have to do is to focus on to draw and gather as much as divine light as we can to bring the birth of the so awaited Golden age.
I have to agree with MHD on this. Any relatively light clouds with the moon BEHIND will look like the image shown. The recent full moon was a very clear example of the reality of the moon. I find it hard to believe that David Icke could be so stupid as write such nonsense.
I’m sorry to have to say that this post damages the credibility of everything else posted on the site. The idea is really beneath consideration, and the photos look to me quite commonplace and unremarkable. A moon floating beneath 10,000 feet is a moon visible to a tiny portion of the earth- any passing jetliner would notice it. It’s an embarrassingly hare-brained notion. David Icke needs to do some serious reality checks….the people who start to claim that the “evil ones” control EVERYTHING and that EVERYTHING is a fraud are the kind of people who give alternative media a bad name.
Michael
Michael….I’ll grant you that this is no more than a creatively thought provoking illusion which is driven by romantic notions and some wishful thinking, but it is no more ridiculous than the moon being a computerized space ship, stationed and positioned by the Annunaki, that keeps us dummies in line with brainwashing frequencies, preventing us from activating our true consciousness. Remember, the planetary collision, “Wack” theory, that supposedly made our moon has no evidence and basis in fact – never scientifically proven. NASA test explosions on the moon have shown it to ‘RING LIKE A BELL,’ while the entire skin/crust wobbled until hidden dampers stabilized it. Solid objects do not ring like a bell!!! Who are we to be SO SURE that the ET’s/ED’s do not vent crap out of the moon during confusing and cloudy earth-based skies? Have you ever noticed the criminal acts of certain factories who take advantage of the twice daily twilight to pump 3-6 times the volume of pollutants into the air without detection? So, if there are alien bases on the moon, than what’s the stretch to them being inside he moon? David Icke’s not crazy, he’s letting the facts steer him and his creativity and insight provoke questions that need investigation. Right this second, their are space craft orbiting the Sun that are as big, if not bigger than the earth….that’s in excess of 8,000 miles in diameter. Do you want to tell the astronomers that they are seeing things and that there photographic proof is all in their heads? Remember, we only know what they allow us to know and no more. Why, because they are millions and billions of years ahead of us in every respect. I have given up being a no-it-all to make room for the impossible. Sure the clouds can be an illusion and nothing more than that, but it’s not the only explanation….
I’m open to the idea that there are bases inside the moon. I am open to the idea that the darker souls in the cabal know how to use the energies exerted by the moon to their advantage. There is sound evidence leading one to rationally conclude that, at the very least, such possibilities cannot be ruled out. That said, the idea that the moon is “fake,” or that there are “clouds behind the moon” – meaning that this supposed fake moon sits between earth and the cloud layer, which is patent nonsense – this idea is simply embarrassingly childish and beneath consideration. Every passenger on every airliner that’s ever flown would have been able to look down on this contraption….please, folks – we endure enough ridicule as it is. I am pleased and proud to participate on this site. I don’t want to recommend it to friends, and then have them say, “Oh, you mean the one that says the moon is fake and floats beneath the cloud layer?”
Michael
You know, Michael, I’m really surprised at the amount of time people have spent on this subject! In the larger picture, is this topic worth so much time? I think the moon is important, and those who have controlled us apparently think so, too, because they took us off a lunar calendar and put os on the Gregorian calendar to further throw us out of alignment with nature. Beyond that I’m not much for spending time on thistopic. I just don’t think it is worth it.
Surely, surely we all could better be spending our time on something else! Do my words makes sense? I wonder . . . perhaps these words, too, will ignite a storm, when I don’t think they should. I guess I’m trying to say that I think it’s well past time to move on to something else. Maybe someday we will get to the place where we can look at all information and let it pass through us with perhaps only a simple, neutral comment about our belief in it. If we could all strive towards that goal, I think it would be very beneficial to us as lightworkers.
Love and hugs to all,
~Jean
Yes, I’m with you on this, Jean – let’s move on.
Om Shanti,
Michael
…touché, my friend….
I’ve watched this a few times now trying to figure out wtf they are pointing out, but I’m just not seeing it…I watch the moon/clouds all the time and this all looks normal, like what I see regularly. Anyone have a better picture to support this claim?