Reflections: A Journey Within – by SaS, November 12, 2012

This article, the best I think we have ever had from SaS, showed up in my mailbox today. In it SaS reflects on the events of these last days—the many surrounding the election and General Petraeus’ resignation. My impression of it is that from the beginning he conceived it as a whole—not in bits and pieces, and it simply poured forth in one constant stream of emotion, ably laced with accurate knowledge and great wisdom. I feel I can say without any doubt that once you start reading it, you will not be able to put it down.

I believe you will enjoy both the read—and the ride!
~Jean

Granted, this past General Election was the political analog of treachery bordering on the grotesque.  For the past several months, we—as a body politic—have suffered continual provocation as a consequence of the nauseating display of sociopathic antagonism culminating in the naked obstruction of Ron Paul’s bid for the Republican nomination.  Every neo-conservative radical[1] who could appropriate sufficient publicity deliberately subverted our Nation’s time-honored democratic ideals.  We watched in disbelief as machine politics took hold of the democratic process—lawmakers and administrators alike casting fate to the wiles of quantum probability as they labored to rig elections, undermine the fourteenth amendment and subvert The Voting Rights Act of 1965!  Billions of dollars were spent—in the form of political speech; that vapid expression of corporate babble uttered by creatures stalking the dark allies of our Nation’s capital greasing palms and spreading the filth of corruption until the very air reeks of the stench of malfeasance.  How unbearably asinine their behavior appeared to everyone as the whole world was watching!

Early in the month, pollsters and astute observers began to understand that, despite a monumental effort to abscond the Presidency through swashbuckling intervention and clandestine intrigue, something had gone awry.  The incumbent seemed undefeatable.  He was rolling through the political countryside as though he were some great siege engine set loose upon the practitioners of financial exploitation!  For nearly two weeks leading up to that fateful first Tuesday in November, the Neo-cons continued to belch confidence and radiate a sniggering audaciousness so typical of their trademark attribute—that of a narcissistic braggart.  They seemed to be telling the rest of us that “You will elect Mitt Romney and you will like it!”  Well, we didn’t like it and we didn’t elect their prancing prince of vulture capitalism either!  For the first time that I can remember, the American people “Just said NO!”  And, what does that tell us about the sophomoric psychopathy of a fascist sociopath?  Yes, brothers and sisters, you’re absolutely right, their manic brain stops and their mouth keeps going!

Yet, another pattern emerges from their deciduous lament: The cognoscenti, having spent the past several months swimming against the international social undercurrent to their origin of birth, have spawned and now appear before us in a great explosion of intellectual vacuity!  “Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war!”[2] This week, we must endure their titular diagnosis as they anatomize—with petulant conviction—every detail of every decision that was ever made during all of the piracy leading up to Election Day.  We’ll get through this; trust me.  Of course there will be an obligatory two additional months of agonizing boredom as these same mountebanks offer their intolerable prognosis of a “politically correct” Barack Obama who will “negotiate” his way into an historic obscurity offering the wealthy, landed aristocrats the alleviating comfort of “special consideration” (Hint, hint—are you listening, Mr. President?).  You know, dear family … having watched his response, I don’t think that he is … of a mind … to kiss anybody’s ass!  It looks as though it’s going to be “Burger King” and, this time around, he’s going to have it his way.  Can you spell the word “underestimate” boys and girls?

Let’s take a look at what our lexicographers call a mountebank.

moun·te·bank  [moun-tuh-bangk] noun

1.     a person who sells quack medicines, as from a platform in public places attracting and influencing an audience by tricks, storytelling, etc.

2.     any charlatan or quack.

Do any of you really believe that President Obama won’t employ “The American Way?”  Of course you don’t!  It’s pay-back time kiddies—time to sweep the damned floor and clean house!  Anyone for a game of “Wack-a-mole?”  Los cabalistas will be abandoning their ranks to escape low-flying armored drones, I’m sure!  One can only guess at the current line-up of “retirees” heading toward the exits; their final act being a gracious, self-deprecating expression of acclamation as they step aside to let another bask in the affluence and absolute power of their former cabinet posts and such selfless humility coming just days after an historic electoral upset too!  Funny I don’t remember any of them suggesting they wouldn’t stay on for a second term.  Do any of you?  Still, the stories abound.  Ah, but we must maintain a decorum of political expediency mustn’t we dear family?  Yes, we must.

On remorse …

Just two come to mind.  General David Petraeus and, of course, the unfortunate Karl Rove.  Let’s look at the stories from the perspective of an outside observer completely immobilized by these two caricatural expos—their revelation being the ludicrous burlesque that it is.  From an international news journal, the Mail, we read:

 “The coterie of officers and advisers surrounding Gen. David Petraeus had become suspicious of the woman, now known to have been his mistress, due to her playful Facebook status updates they claim disclosed sensitive details of military operations in Afghanistan.

Paula Broadwell, the woman who penned the military chief’s biography and ultimately began a romantic relationship with the married 60-year-old, became a cause of concern back in 2009 when those in Petraeus’ inner circle saw her lighthearted postings on the social networking website.”

On a social networking website no less!  All such similar disclosures aside, we reluctantly acknowledge that, once again, the U.S. Constitution has been abused like some despondent housewife as we see definitions for “sensitive details” of military operations modified to take on the codification of “lighthearted postings.”  Is there no justice?  I guess not!  If bankers can get away with the annihilation of an entire national economy well then might not a ranking flag officer be undermined by an unrequited lover—his biographer, no less!  She knows everything about him!  How could such a charming, well-healed Washington socialite have breached beltway etiquette violating the trust of an aging paratrooper in midlife crisis?  Here we learn that there is a class of women who demand “compensation” on terms their suitors seldom consider as they become helplessly entangled in the duplicity of an “extra-marital affair.”  No doubt the General must have enjoyed tapping her as a “resource,” yes—how playful—but Bradley Manning might not think so, and so we witness the witless abrogation of yet another Constitutional guarantee—that of equal protection under the law.  This stuff had been going on since 2009!  And, only now, has it come to light that it was a “cause for concern” amongst the nation’s top intelligence aficionados.  Apparently, Julian Assange is the desperado of preference and Manning an aimless patriot betrayed by civic virtue.  Go figure.  The fact that no one is suggesting a breach of “protocol” or a violation of the TOP SECRET security clearance she would have been granted to secure such close proximity to a military theater commander, doesn’t raise eyebrows—eh?  You think on that one; but I’ve never seen a swindle pulled off with such impudence in my entire life and I’ve been walking around on this planet for thirty years longer than most of you!  We must now ask ourselves: “What can we expect from the CIA in the future?”

The second fascinating and rather newsworthy development began to emerge as the grand faux pas of one Karl Rove—the once and future baronet of our former President George W.  As a White House plumber, he exceeded everyone’s expectations including those of his Commander and Chief!  My, but how we have fallen from the grace of our luminaries in these heady days of Cosmic Change!  We read from his personal web page a somewhat presumptuous and rather prophetic prediction:

“Without twelve toss up states (MN, NV, CO, IA, WI, MI, OH, PA, NH, VA, NC, AND FL), Mitt Romney and Barack Obama are tied at 191 each.  I predict Mr. Romney will win FL (29), NC (15), VA (13), NH (4), OH (18), IA (6), CO (9) and Mr. Obama will get MN (10), NV (6), WI (10), MI (16), PA (20). This brings Mr. Romney to 285 Electoral College votes and Mr. Obama to 253.  These are just my base predictions and I still think several of these states are too close to call.  For example, while I put them in Mr. Obama’s column, I still believe NV, WI, and PA are in play and very winnable for Mr. Romney.  If crowds at his recent stops in these states are any indication of his supporters’ enthusiasm, Mr. Romney will likely be able to claim victory in these states as well.”

Well, talk about unabashed enthusiasm, it would appear that the now infamous “Karl Rove Map” (Go here to view it: http://rove.com/election) fell somewhat shy of the accuracy with which, it was claimed, it had been fabricated.  And, believe me, the meaning of the word “fabricated” is the key to understanding the pattern of lawless, anti-social, impudence that was in play during the months running up to Election Day.  Think about it.  He arrived at this conclusion in part because of the “… crowds at his recent stops …” gave purchase to his deduction that “… Mr. Romney will likely be able to claim victory …” An interesting assumption.  However, in hindsight, we now know that Mr. Rove neglected to consider Murphy’s law in this account of his decision-making process.  After all, Dr. Ron Paul’s phenomenal ascendency to the national political forum exhibited similar performance and he couldn’t even come close to winning the Republican nomination for President!  How does such popularity play into a system of “well-regulated choice” anyhow?  Had our boy, Karl, neglected to understand a subtle yet overriding dynamic of political conflict?  It would appear that he did.  In the pages of the journal “Politico” we read:

“The face of the historic $1 billion plan to unseat President Barack Obama and turn the Senate Republican, Rove now finds himself the leading scapegoat for its failure. And he’s scrambling to protect his status as a top GOP moneyman by convincing disappointed donors to his Crossroads groups that he did the best he could with their $300 million.”

He “… did the best he could …” with their billions!  Is there no longer any sentiment or loyalty amongst a kleptomaniac feudal fraternity of delusional corporate misfits?  They all entrusted their shameless ambitions to this prince of pretense as he fell—headlong—into a hackneyed hypothesis that “bigger is better” dragging all of them with him into his precipitous and frightening descent!  Little Karl, again, neglected to remember, from his studies in political science at the University of Utah, the sagacious utterance of one Abraham Lincoln.  The 16th President of these United States and a Republican at that, President Lincoln was reported to have said, in one of his speeches at Clinton, Illinois, on September 2nd, 1858:

“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.”

Instead, Rove became passionately assertive with the convoluted advice of his former boss, George W. Bush who once confidently claimed: “You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on.”   Alas, our former President was never known for his intellectual agility and so we have the present ill-fated abatement of Mr. Rove’s career as a “political consultant” and “moneyman” in terms that most of us can understand as quite humiliating.  Aside from his clamoring effort to “right” himself (You like that play on words, do you?), one cannot presume that his boyish image might dominate the media for much longer.  People—his kind of people—won’t relish the companionship of a Neo-conservative shmuck who exhibited absolutely no accountability as he pissed through over a billion dollars of other people’s money shamelessly advocating the law of diminishing returns as a hallmark of “right-minded” thinking (Ah!  There I go again!  Sorry my darlings but I just can’t help myself!).  And, they have themselves to blame!  They might have developed a proclivity to discern the stupidity of it all had they not decided to spend billions more on their ridiculous “Geo-engineering” schemes. Hiring a fleet of airliners to dump aluminum oxide, barium salt, and strontium in volumes that stagger our arithmetic aptitudes was an act so typical of their tiny minds.  They actually had the unmitigated gall to assume that they could reverse genetic modifications, underway throughout the Galaxy, by applying a pathetic and dimwitted mechanical solution to the threat of “ascension” wherein the rising tide of awareness would raise our species to a higher vibration of consciousness and the next level of density.  From Daniel we are “enlightened” to read:

“Geoengineering requires genetic modification to keep the status quo. If removed, nature will reassert itself and start the process of healing. The altered atmosphere and genetically modified organism are seen by nature as an injury and disease—and it can, and will, treat those injuries and kill the disease when given a chance.

The globalists must keep inflicting injury to the ecosystem in order to retain control of it. If they don’t, they’ll lose control of it and it will start to revert to what it should be.”[3]

Since, they are now obviously cash poor and running out of time as we approach the end of the long count, might their final failure be revealed to us as this systematic and indiscernible string of social, political, religious, and financial catastrophes?  It would seem so.  These events plague their undertakings to the degree that they are consuming themselves in a ferocious and turbulent public exhibition of rampant sophistry and cognitive dissonance!  I suppose that I should relent in my scrutiny of Mr. Rove, having laid threadbare the calamity of his insular thinking—my knowing full well that he is, at present, exploring the wisdom of separation.  It is an intellectual abstraction, true, but it doesn’t make him any less loathsome a confidante on this journey and, as a matter of record, our sister “Debbie” doesn’t seem to like him very much and our sister “Raine” thinks him a moron.  I must concede their observations are pertinent.  These attributions are not the cantankerous discourse of a disenfranchised curmudgeon but rather the aggregate expression of exasperation running through the very thoughts of every one of us.  So, in their commonality of experience, the suppositions of our two noble sisters must be accepted as the “Truth”—that knowledge which is common to the mind of “the other.”  We are one.

On the future fortunes of the privileged …

The “Lame Stream Media” never ceases to amaze me as they are continually divining the future fortunes of humankind!  Now, all of us are quite aware of the fact that their entreaties are rooted in fatuous assumption—cognitive brain farts.  These people are paid by the Cabal to sit around in a room and “think big thoughts” none of which are heart-based, to be sure, and all of which astonish us in their temerity!  Remember the exodus of “Los payasos estúpidos”[4] to which I earlier referred.  Among them the pundits claim that Hilary Clinton will be the first woman to become President of these United States.  Let’s examine this observation.  In the Washington Post we read: “… Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has made clear she plans to leave early in the Obama second term …”  And, in an article in the International Business Times we read:

“While most normal Americans are relieved the long 2012 campaign is at last over, for those who can’t stop speculating about the next election are focusing on Hillary Clinton.

Since Clinton’s victorious 2008 rival, Barack Obama, named her as Secretary of State she’s kept quiet, always denying any interest in another run at the White House after her current boss’s second term.

But two days after Obama was re-elected, Politico reported Clinton is the clear favorite among  Democrats for 2016. A hypothetical poll found Clinton would take 58 percent of the vote in Iowa, where the first caucuses are held, over Vice President Joe Biden’s 17 percent and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s 6 percent. Elizabeth Warren, who was just elected senator from Massachusetts, polled at 3 percent in the crucial state.”

Read through this quote again but, this time, use your evolving discernment to pick up on the subliminal suggestions couched as relevant fact.  First of all most Americans are relieved that the 2012 campaign is over.  This establishes the “hook.”[5]  It then dives right into speculation asserting that there are many who just can’t wait to vote Mrs. Clinton into the office of the Presidency.  In this article, we’re treated to the pedantic declaration that Joe Biden can’t win the nomination and neither can New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.  Moreover, Elizabeth Warren hasn’t the chance of a snowball in hell of even being considered!  In this regard, she appears to be following in the tradition of Dr. Ron Paul as being a dazzling possibility with the least likely chance of winning consideration at her own birthday party let alone the Democratic Party.  We have to ask ourselves, could the Democratic Party be governed by such short-sighted people?  Of course, then we’d have to answer our own question: “Yes.”

In other articles about Secretary Clinton we are treated to her provenance and extensive resume and skill set.  An example from the journal “Politico” November 8, 2012 reads:

“Clinton, particularly, freezes her party’s 2016 nomination process starting at this moment. After barely falling short in 2008 and earning high marks and soaring approval ratings in four years as America’s top diplomat, she unambiguously has the strongest claim on being the next Democratic standard-bearer. If, and it is a big unknown, she wants another shot at the presidency.”

Now, when did this sudden shift in popular appeal occur?  Was it before or after the Libyan debacle?  Might it have been the consequence of her somewhat unsuccessful trip to China seeking the cooperation of their money managers in the administration’s effort to stabilize the decline of the dollar?  Would it have been because of an earlier dispute with President Vladimir Putin in which the press reported:

“The former KGB lieutenant colonel appeared to lash out at U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton — a leading Democratic candidate for president — when one reporter quoted her as saying that former KGB officers have no soul:

“At a minimum, a head of state should have a head,” Putin is reported to have said.

Wise words from President Putin aside, notice the reference to Mrs. Clinton being the “leading Democratic candidate” from an article that was published in “Politico” February 15, 2008!  Ostensibly, it could have been a subliminal suggestion that Putin might better consider who he would be dealing with following an Obama administration, but even then, the pundits were involved in audacious fabrication.  We’re treated to the mindset of the Cabal as it orchestrates inevitability—or so they would assume that they can.  The theme running through all of this is that “We the People” have no voice and are habitually denied the right to self-determination.

But, that’s not what happened on November 6, 2012.  On that day the best laid plans of these insufferable rodents were turned upon their heads and the impossible was achieved amidst the quiet desperation of our Nation’s “silent majority.”  Those who work in the fields to harvest our food; those who labor in the mines and on the drilling platforms to gather our fuel; those whose constant vigilance makes certain the advent of tomorrow: the honest businessmen, wealthy entrepreneur, the tradesmen, educators, first-responders, doctors, lawyers, public servants—that silent majority—commandeered an election stolen from all of us and then set the pace for elections yet to come.  It is difficult for many of us to accept the turnabout as a legitimate consequence of public outrage and personal determination but there it is, nonetheless.

Underestimating “The One”

Your comments do you credit but they still reflect an uncertainty indicative of a people who have not yet accepted their inheritance or acknowledged their power and place in the Cosmos.  How many times must you be told that you are Sovereign Integrals of the One Creator/God?  How many times must “The One” demonstrate its eternal love for you?  Wouldn’t you all agree that this pageant of abject buffoonery might be something more than just a circumstance predicated on feckless human error?  Give yourself some credit why don’t you!  How much purchase can these scoundrels have over our destiny as a discrete species of sentient beings if they think that they can only win through deception and defective science?  As we approach the inevitability of that future “Singularity,” can we continue to fool ourselves that humanity has not awakened?  And, for those of us who have, can we continue to assume that teaming billions of our collective human family continue to drown in ignorance as the Cabal is thrust into an uncontrollable chaos that is the product of their own myopic mischief?

Again, though I beg your pardon for having said it so many times, you are the architects of the “New Earth” and the builders of human harmony.  It will be done according to your thoughts and your thoughts are agile; they are gathering the power of synthesis!  Our chem-trailing, contagion-dumping, money-grabbing, self-serving detractors are losing every conflict they instigate and, of late, rapidly so.  In an epic work of a bygone era by Grace A. Turkington entitled: Helps for the Study of Our Constitution, the author writes:

“A constitution is a definite plan for doing something.  If a group of people want to accomplish something of importance, they draw up a plan or agreement.  If a large number of persons are interested in what is to be accomplished, to save time they usually appoint a committee to draw up a plan.  The plan decided on by the committee is then presented to the others to be discussed and changed if necessary.

Various names are given to the written plans and agreements that the people make.  Contracts, compacts, articles of association, charters, constitutions are some of these names.

Whatever they are called, these plans are alike in this one respect, that they tell (1) what a group of people hope to accomplish; (2) how they expect to accomplish it.  The constitution, or charter, of a college tells what the college plans to teach and how it is to be run; the constitution, or articles of incorporation, of a manufacturing business tells what the company plans to manufacture, and how this is to be accomplished.  All this seems very sensible and businesslike.

The importance of every organization and therefore of every constitution depends on three things:

  1. The purpose for which it was made.
  2. How many people will be affected by its success or failure.
  3. What success it has already had.”

This book was published in 1925.  What does our Federal Constitution state is the reason for its existence?  To understand that question as well as to answer it, we must read from the Text of the Federal Constitution of the United States of America wherein we discover in its preamble that:

 “We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this CONSTITUTION for the United States of America.”

We know the purpose for which our constitution was written and implemented.  We know that its successes as well as its failures have affected all of us in some way.  But, of its successes, we can treasure most its notion of that “… more perfect union …” because, in that context, therein lies the power to overcome any and every threat to the security of the Nation and the prosperity of the people.  We are one and have been since the beginning of time.  This constitution of ours is not “just a piece of paper.”   Our Federal Constitution is the material manifestation of Unity; it is a quantifiable expression of our true nature as powerful, eternal, immortal creator beings of light and love.  Read the objectives again, and again, and again until you are completely aware of their universal appeal.  It soon becomes apparent, to even the most casual observer, that the Cabal doesn’t understand the document and therefore cannot fathom its divine purpose—a vision for the future of humankind!  And, as Judeo-Christian scripture admonishes “Where there is no vision, the people perish.” [Proverbs 29:18].  Brothers and sisters of The One, we stand on the threshold of a dream.  Walk through the portal and into the light.  We have won as we have always won and, in that victory, proclaim the sanctity of life eternal and unconditional love in all of its enduring majesty and power.

Love and Light,

SaS


[1] If Neo-Cons are right-wing conservatives then Ralph Waldo Emerson was a monkey’s uncle!  These characters are sociopathic fascists who adhere to feudal collectivism—so far to the left they’re shaking hands with King Louis XIV.  Grandiose, imperial, and insufferably seditious in their deportment, their arrogance can only be eclipsed by their seemingly other-worldly vacuity.

[2] Shakespeare; Act 3, Scene 1, line 273 of Julius Caesar.

[4] Los payasos estúpidos is translated from the Spanish to mean, “The stupid clowns” their clown shoes fully-inflated and their rainbow hair on fire!

[5] Read my article on “misdirection” entitled: The Nature of the Thing on this blog to understand how spin doctors set the reader up to accept psycho-babble and propaganda blather as empirical evidence.

This entry was posted in Ascension, Financial/economic information, Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption, Political and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Reflections: A Journey Within – by SaS, November 12, 2012

  1. Ken says:

    Thanks SaS for your perspective. As we grow older and hopefully wiser I feel thankful to those who have taken the time to articulate their enlightenment so that it can be passed on to the collective. We are all teachers and we are all students. Discern what is right for you but do not allow pride to judge who’s right but what is the truth. Thanks again SaS!

    There is, in fact, no teaching without learning. One requires the other.
    Paulo Freire

  2. Bjorn says:

    Interesting SaS, and thank you.

    I am glad you choose to ditch Mitt Romney this time.
    But maybe your future lies in the ‘not-so-united’ states of America? Leave Washington with the Constitution, and let the states take care of the rest? Aristoteles is supposed to have said something like ‘if you get more than 50.000 people, you can not have democracy’. Break this big power structures up!

    Another interesting note to your explanation of the word ‘mountebank’. The word quack originates from from the German word for Mercury (quecksilber). In other words, dentists who adhere to the common practice today of ‘silver’ fillings. You are not far off if arguing that the whole og modern mainstream health care are the real quacks.

  3. Rev. Joe C says:

    ” And the meek shall inherit the [ NEW ] Earth ! “

  4. ethaos says:

    “You will elect Mitt Romney and you will like it!” “KNOT”!!!!

    Discern this-
    a-Ron Paul is Illuminati.
    b-Romney is a puppet.
    c-Petraeus is hiding something.
    d-The war was for Heroin NOT Oil!
    e-The only way to control is to let go!

    I will illustrate as to my why.

    A- Why would a succesful pediatrician choose a political career?
    B- How could a failure rise to power?
    C- The head of the CIA loses everything because he got a lil nookie from his biographer?
    D- My Dad told me twas not bought OIL!
    E- Jesus demonstrated this two millemia ago!

    I will illustrate with a story (parable) to enlighten. At my grandfathers wake I learned why he and my father hated “blaacks”! My Dad’s Dad was a “Fire Chief” in Chi-Town during the riots. While his men were fighting “the Inferno” they had a black women report children in an abonded building that was burning. The firemen did there duty and some lost their lives. The “witness” who lied to kill was found later drinking at a bar and suffered wrath.

    They where all manipulated by a system. We need to carefully destroy this “system” and leave our humanity intact. Tis a monumental task but IMHO a simple one. Follow the “Golden Rule” or in Jesus’s words “Do unto others as they would do unto you”!

    As the Wiccan’s say “Blessed BE”!!!

    Letting go is the way to true personal power.

    This does not mean you don’t care but that you accept your role. I am just the guy who makes the donuts should I feel guilty that the system kills thousands across the world everyday due to starvation?

    Accept your role and ignore their rule!

  5. tertiusgaudens says:

    Please forgive me, I usually use such language only in private – but this was absofuckinglutely refreshing to read! (not even Gordon Duff could have it done better, hahaha)!

    A little remark on the constitution book from 1925. It came just to my mind, that in the same year Khalil Gibran`s book The Prophet was published in Germany. Somehow a constitution of mind and soul…

    You might chew on a piece of Gibran on freedom:

    At the city gate and by your fireside I have seen you prostrate yourself and worship your own freedom,
    Even as slaves humble themselves before a tyrant and praise him though he slays them.
    Ay, in the grove of the temple and in the shadow of the citadel I have seen the freest among you wear their freedom as a yoke and a handcuff.
    And my heart bled within me; for you can only be free when even the desire of seeking freedom becomes a harness to you, and when you cease to speak of freedom as a goal and a fulfilment.

    You shall be free indeed when your days are not without a care nor your nights without a want and a grief,
    But rather when these things girdle your life and yet you rise above them naked and unbound.

    And how shall you rise beyond your days and nights unless you break the chains which you at the dawn of your understanding have fastened around your noon hour?
    In truth that which you call freedom is the strongest of these chains, though its links glitter in the sun and dazzle your eyes.

    And what is it but fragments of your own self you would discard that you may become free?
    If it is an unjust law you would abolish, that law was written with your own hand upon your own forehead.
    You cannot erase it by burning your law books nor by washing the foreheads of your judges, though you pour the sea upon them.
    And if it is a despot you would dethrone, see first that his throne erected within you is destroyed.
    For how can a tyrant rule the free and the proud, but for a tyranny in their own freedom and a shame in their own pride?
    And if it is a care you would cast off, that care has been chosen by you rather than imposed upon you.
    And if it is a fear you would dispel, the seat of that fear is in your heart and not in the hand of the feared.

    Verily all things move within your being in constant half embrace, the desired and the dreaded, the repugnant and the cherished, the pursued and that which you would escape.
    These things move within you as lights and shadows in pairs that cling.
    And when the shadow fades and is no more, the light that lingers becomes a shadow to another light.
    And thus your freedom when it loses its fetters becomes itself the fetter of a greater freedom.

    Greetings from Germany!

  6. Energy says:

    SAS’s paint brush is pretty broad for me. The biggest thing I have learned from this election process is “a pox on both their houses”. Everything said about Rove I pretty much agree with and there is no question that their is a neo-con group out there that has been a horrible thing for this world.
    but am I missing something? Have we not been droning people with impunity the last four years? Have we not passed bills that continue to restrict our freedom, our speech, our food choices, our internet liberty?
    Have we not passed bills that restricted soldiers ability to defend themselves, stationed forts at the bottom of hills so the enemy can easily attack, used depleted uranium shells that are a Million year problem for our enemy, our own soldiers and the civilians who live there?
    Has not our military defended a country where opium is the number one cash crop and we do the transporting? Did we not send arms into Libya, drop bombs by the thousands and see the murder of a leader who was a bad guy but seems to have done much for his country the last ten years?
    But, again, I digress….If you see the light only coming from the Left and the darkness only coming from the Right…….I think that is kind of sad
    I grew up in a small Midwestern town, very religious (More Churches than bars!). Most people voted Democratic because they were for the working man and Jack Kennedy had just run for President. They voted Democratic because Dems were for the working man, which everyone in that small town was. Now it seems as if the /dems are for those who mostly want things for free with very little responsibility or accountability. They act as if the only opportunity must be under the guise of a Union.
    Why are most cities, states run by Anti-Roves broke, ever raising taxes, poorly educated, violent, dirty? go to my city or Detroit, California. More and more unhappiness, single Mothers while abortion is rampant, children who run around with no responsible parent, carrying a gun, can’t speak to the point they are unintelligible, music that is an abomination, especially when compared to the great songs in these comments?
    Have you been to an inner city where people are bused to vote but there are no jobs, no gardens, very little cleanliness, Fathers?
    We have had a government for four years that has been controlled by the Anti Roves…how are we doing so far? Now they have four more, I wish them well because my workers, mostly minorities, need food, housing etc for their families. My business has been struggling for six years. I started a new one two years ago to try to capture a new area of need (energy efficiency) to make money and give my workers a decent living and opportunity. People need what we do but are afraid to spend, or don’t have it. Several of my suppliers are about to close because of lack of revenue.
    Most of us are way past the idea of Republicans good/Democrats bad. we also don’t have much proof that Democrats good/Republicans bad after this last four years.
    Let me finish by going back to my small town where I grew up. Families of either political stripe worked, worshipped, gardened, played ball, kept their yards, went to parades that honored soldiers, listened to the Cincinnati Reds on the radio in the back yard while sitting under a tree on a hot summer day. Now, with our new leaders of society, we have cell phones plastered up to peoples ears non stop, free food, free utilities, drugs rampant, violence out of hand, no one reading to their kids, no one claiming the FAtherhood of many of these kids!
    And while SAS points out which side is good, which is bad….people like me will go to work, coach our kids sports teams, pay our taxes, spend time with our kids, turn off the TV, ignore both political parties, go to Church and pray for all of us because all of us are being abused by both of these carpetbagging political parties. A lot of us out here are tired of the division, tired of being pulled one way or the other but know that our country and our world are on the wrong track and are surrounded by a huge population that is unawake, controlled by a central cabal that is above either parties and , unfortunately, is very dangerous.
    At then end of Ann Barnhardts You tube video about the debt implosion, she cites the story of St. Peter and Quo Vadis (Where are we Going?).
    Where I am going is to: create a world that gives my two boys and their young wives a chance to make it through the coming maelstrom, to do as much good as I can everyday because I expect to lose all I have (which is fine, I’m tired of cutting grass!), to try to provide protection for my wife who has worked 80 hours a week helping kids for 37 years, have a place over our head, and enough to make it through the end of our life, to live life as nobly as my Mom and Dad did, with independence, charity and love.
    If the Anti-Roves can help me do this, I’ll be grateful but I don’t get the anger. They were in charge the last four years and they are still mad at someone else. Now you get four more years, I have no faith in their ability to lead, to foster a more perfect Union, to grow, to foster faith, love, responsibility but SAS, you now have your chance for four more years.
    Use it well, my friend.

  7. dobbsie says:

    Please put down the Thesaurus before someone gets hurt! A little post-election jubilation is in order for those who supported the incumbent, who, according to Fulford, saw the light after his financial backers cut off his allowance. However—

    Karl Rove was an errand boy. Maybe he’ll go the way of the dodo bird, but I think not. Even if he’s gone for good, there are plenty to take his place.

    Giving space to an unnamed political junkie already talking about Hillary in 2016 is like the old neo-con strategy of using absurd examples to make a point. I am more interested in the next four weeks, not the next four years.

    I really wouldn’t have commented except for the last line which begins “We have won as we have always won…” What does that mean? This 64 year old has been opposing injustice, exploitation,
    etc., for half a century. Things have not gotten better during that time that I can detect; quite the contrary.

    I am admittedly new to all this Ascension language and “channeled” material, so this may be an unfair statement according to the discernment of long-timers, but since these sources purportedly
    have insight that I don’t, could one of them “avoid surplusage” as Mark Twain would say, and make
    some concrete assertions for those of us who don’t see the perfection of the plan.

  8. justme says:

    Actually Nora, that’s a good point….I’m sorry everyone… : (…my point at the time was supposed to alert people to their own Country’s historical beauty…my bad

    Cop this then, and please, if you google, don’t wiki, it is not correct (aaah, the sensorship of the internet, he was on his deathbed)….

    Love and Peace…

    • Nora says:

      “Rule with your heart and live with your conscience” So be it Just”you”! :) You are preaching to the choir here, or at least this chorister! No need for wiki – was and still am a fan of Queen and the late great Freddie Mercury. The words of some of their songs are apt imo for the times we are living in. “This could be Heaven for Everyone” for instance and “Days of our Lives” all penned/recorded during the last few months of his life. :(

  9. justme says:

    did someone swallow a dictionary….does answering ones own questions push their opinions on others….does belittliing one’s political allegiance help anything…

    So, there’s political views that are different to yours, so what?

    “Ah, but we must maintain a decorum of political expediency mustn’t we dear family? Yes, we must.”…what?

    “Yes, brothers and sisters, you’re absolutely right, their manic brain stops and their mouth keeps going!”…what?

    who the hell is Sas when he’s at home?….a rock star? coz that’ll help…

    doesn;t the Montague Keen, aah, I’ll call it an article say “CONSCIOUSNESS DOES NOT GROW FROM BEING TOLD FACTS. IT GROWS FROM THE SEARCH FOR THEM.”

    hmmmm, “2012: what’;s the real truth”….so, what IS the real truth? Getting pi$$ed off at: the political world of the US…those who have some form of power that influences how we make money…those who write alternative perspectives that only get you annoyed about how you, and to use SaS’s words, “poor boys and girls” are hard done by….what is it that this site tries to teach us…the truth?…from who’s perspective? SaS’s? Montague Keen’s? Ben Fulford’s? Jean? please, i do ask seriously, please don’t chastise….

    To use words from a very powerful leader of YOUR country: “Darkness cannot put out darkness. Only light can do that…. Difficult and painful as it is, we must walk on in the days ahead with an audacious faith in the future. When our days become dreary with low-hovering clouds of despair, and when our nights become darker than a thousand midnights, let us remember that there is a creative force in this universe, working to pull down the gigantic mountains of evil, a power that is able to make a way out of no way and transform dark yesterdays into bright tomorrows. Let us realize the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice”….Martin Luther King…

    Oh I’ve used discernment, and I wonder, can you? You ARE the most briiliant people who walk on this Earth, as we all are, but, seriously, as long as someone listens I suppose it must ok hey?…if this helps anyone…..

    Love and peace

    • Nora says:

      just like to say MLK wasn’t a leader in MY country but a great man nevertheless. Thank you.

    • Jean says:

      Here’s what I think: You’ve got it all wrong about this site if you think we are trying to teach anything here. We are simply sharing our thoughts and ideas, and if you choose you can learn from things people say – or not. Does this make sense to you? Everyone is in a different place. Everyone has such different ideas, and to negate someone because his/her ideas don’t appeal to you is surely a waste of valuable time. Take what you can, and leave the rest. That’s something I hope people who come here will do . . . Hope this helps to answer your question. Hugs, ~Jean

  10. DrinkDeep says:

    SaS, you’re alive with alliteration… Yes! ;)

    I just stopped by to bring a hug from the Fulford blog – this is a good place to plant it

    Security Camera Video Captures Good Too

    Comment by mbridges on November 13, 2012 @ 7:38 am

  11. Roberto says:

    Bravo SaS!

    Beautifully stated!

    With your permission I will blog this further to share the fun and the spiritual points!

    Roberto

    • Jean says:

      Roberto, I’m sure SaS would be delighted if you choose to share this material :) Hugs, ~Jean

      • Edwin says:

        And exactly how does SaS presume to know… that Obama is not truly an insider among those he counted? In my opinion he does not. But, rather is blowing a horn because the likes the sound of it. From my perspective… all evidence so far… shows Obama to be just another of the good old boys… with ultimately the same agenda as those SaS vilifies. Am I really to believe,,, that the current administration has America’s best interest at heart? Really? Now who is the bigger fool?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s