Here is further “confirmation” of “transition” as Drunvalo originally talked about it’s manifestation getting underway. This is not to say that the “Big Change” won’t come in the next few months. This is to suggest that everyone has recognized that the “hope and change” campaigns of propaganda politicians like the President ran on, have been recognized as futile, opaque metaphors that just aren’t going to work and so are no longer believed in. The new “Change” is going to come from the bottom—the people—that’s us—and not the organizational corporate societies. ~J
In this episode, Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert argue over whether things are looking better or worse for the American worker. While Stacy argues that the return of some manufacturing is a sign that wealth creating jobs may return to the U.S., Max counters that the system is so corrupt that the chances of labor getting any cut of the wealth is nil and that the internet giants will prevent the rise of a powerful decentralized economy online. In the second half, Max Keiser talks to Professor Jonathan Feldman about the Global Teach-In and about a boycott and short sale campaign and creating an industrial policy for America because right now the US even outsources some military production to China.
What these guys tend to dance around – and Max does it less than the others – is the answer to the question that they keep bringing up: What is the integrating concept behind all these different problems we are facing?
I say it is Ethics, which for me means how we deal with criminality, as we discover it both in ourselves and as external threats.
Max talks about the criminality of the ruling groups, which he is very pessimistic about, while most of the others just talk about “new ideas” that will somehow allow us to survive better anyway. But as Max points out, there is a limit to how effective new ideas can be. And that has to do with criminal attempts to – essentially – outlaw them.
Some say what happened to the money system in America was that the bankers found a way to “outlaw” the successful system that the founders had put in place in the Constitution. This was basically a fait accompli by the early 1900s, and we have been sliding downhill ever since. This was an ethical lapse on the part of our leadership. We didn’t need any “new ideas.” We just needed to successfully protect the system our founders had put in place, and we failed.
That was an out-ethics situation – it still is – and it needs to be repaired. We will get absolutely nowhere in our attempts or build better physical lives if we cannot learn how to handle and eradicate our own destructive tendencies, and especially those of habitual criminals. This is essentially spiritual work, and it can be done. We just need more individuals to see through all the misdirects, confront the truth, and learn the skills they need to get ethics in.
It seems to me you are still trying to repair the old system, and what Max is suggesting in these videos is that The ONE has decided the old system will be trashed, because we’re going to have an entirely new one… what has been done to us in my opinion goes so far beyond lapses in ethical judgment as to make such an idea almost preposterous. These folks don’t have the slightest understanding of ethics. Such a word is utterly foreign to them. Surely that fact is now apparent. . . I think Max is saying that the population is now getting it – it’s up to us, and we’re going to bring about the change from the bottom up, which is after all the way all change is affected. Happy New Year and hugs, ~Jean
If by the “old system” you mean beings living in bodies on planets – yes, I would like to repair that. I think we still need that game a while longer.
I know there is endless talk of a “new system.” And of course I know you are really referring to how the money supply is controlled and how people create things and exchange them for other things and so on. But I am saying the same thing about that system in particular as I am about life in general, whether it be here on earth or anywhere else.
If you can get ethics in on that system you can win with it.
I also understand that “ethics” is a problematic word to use for what I am talking about. But it is the word my teacher uses, so I use it. As I use it, it means a whole technology that seeks to empower honest beings of good will and to deny power to the dishonest and criminals. It is part and parcel of any “system” because without it the system will be destroyed by the criminal mind. Whether we keep some version of the financial system we have now, change it completely, or all ascend to a new density, without ethics life degrades and with it improvements become possible.