Sandy Hook “Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!” BUSTED . . . trying again, folks . . . ~J

Published on Jan 6, 2013
Thanks to S.

This entry was posted in Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption. Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to Sandy Hook “Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!” BUSTED . . . trying again, folks . . . ~J

  1. The Vimeo video has been removed and the tweet about the same but they are still in the Google index:
    Type this into Google search box site:https://twitter.com/bacmaster/status/267326143923904512 and you will find the tweet and its original index date.
    Type this into Google search box site:http://vimeo.com/53220123 and you will find the video post and its original index date

  2. Larry Cox says:

    I know this whole thing about “funds” has gotten people on a roll, but this article IS about Sandy Hook.

    I have seen articles and videos about incidents being totally concocted.

    But to think that more than a dozen persons could be listed as dead when they were never actually killed, or killed in some other way than stated, that really takes it over the top.

    In Aurora we had actual photos of the crime scene (taken from a plane by a professional photographer who happened to live in the area). There was blood on the sidewalk. There were items on the ground supposedly discarded by the people who perpetrated the crime. There were eyewitnesses who spoke of what happened inside. Unlike the coverage we get back on foreign conflicts, there have been no photos released of the actual victims lying dead as they were found in the theater. But we have every reason to believe that people were actually killed there.

    Now there is this event. As far as I can tell, we actually have no hard evidence that this event occurred as stated. Is this some sort of mass psychological study to see how far a population can be mislead before they begin to catch on? I can’t believe that the clues that point to this being a hoax, as mentioned in the video, were unintentional. They want us to gradually figure out that this whole thing was fishy. So: Did it happen, or not? How in the hell do we know for sure if all we get is media events telling us that it happened?

    Did this really happen, or is it some sort of test for us?

    • ohnwentsya says:

      I don’t know if it did, but I know that the people questioning it have gone so far over the line that they make anyone who questions the official line look like total nutcases now.

      Harrassing people who were there, calling them actors etc is bizarre and uncalled for-while it is understandable to speculate on the internet or in conversations about what did or did not happen-It is unimaginably cruel and insane to harass people who may have actually just lost their children to murder.

      I read an article about this yesterday and it made me question what kind of groups I assocaite with,and what kind of people I am listening to and taking seriously?

      I do not think I want anything to do with people that heartless, no matter what their so called reasons for their obnoxious behaviour.

      I also call into question the videos and articles claiming this was a movie. The cabal have never been known for their concern for human life.

      When they do a false flag it is part of the MO from Pearl Harbor to JFK/RFK to 9-11 that there be REAL DEAD PEOPLE.

      Why on Earth would they suddenly switch gears?

      I personally feel that all the material claiming it was a movie is disinfo seeking to discredit those who have legitimate concerns that it could have been done by some group as a false flag not the unfortunate mentally ill individual who does appear to have been a patsy.

      Why are people SO gullible as to believe and repeat any idiocy that is posted on the internet?

      Just because the official story may not be entirely true it does not logically follow that ANY nonsense any one comes up with and can make a youtube for IS true.

      I would rather err on the side of compassion and RESPECT for people who have very likely REALLY been traumatized and lost loved ones-**little freakin kids for criminys sake!!!**
      than try to prove how hip and in the know I am by being awful to someone who has just lost a child.

      I think when we start following every stupid theory that comes out, we quickly and very rightly, lose credibility and standing with anyone who has any sense at all.

      I am sorry if that sounds harsh but I lost my child and if some wingnut came up and gave me crap like that afterward every last bit of my spiritual growth would have shrunk back to 6 lifetimes ago and I would have done something really really un-evolved to them. repeatedly.

      I think lightworkers should maybe contemplate what they are doing and why, and look at basing their actions and what they choose to believe in, follow and promote based on Respect, Love, Unity and Compassion rather than jumping on the latest thing and being part of the “in crowd” like a bunch of middle schoolers.

      The REASON we oppose the cabal is because they cause real suffering to real people-if we join in and make that suffering worse-exactly HOW are we OPPOSING them?

      This sandy hook “movie” nonsense and the pro-violence/guns/civil war section of the so called lightworker movement have me considering whether it is really a place or group I have any point in being associated with at all, ever. It’s all been making me feel very sick whenever I read or see it.:-(

  3. calie says:

    RMN’s is indicating that United Way offered condolences to Sandy Hook three days prior to the envent…Keep posting to keep this story out there…We need the TRUTH..

  4. Blondie says:

    OMG, this video is so good. Thank you Jean! I liked when he speculated why they made this Sandy Hook “movie”. It’s the money and “the satanic freakout crap”. Yup, sounds about right. Everyone, pass this video around!

  5. Victoria says:

    There is so much info/disinfo out there, I have decided not to decide if any of i is true! :O

  6. DavidG says:

    Drake is all about war preperation. He has dissmised Peoples Trust on very unintelligent grounds. He then goes on to brag about his munitions. I don’t think you should all follow this guy to civil war. He is gagging for it… get ur done.. code for WAR!
    I also don’t think you should give up your guns but for the very first time i see Drake as a WAR nut job!
    I don’t know what the future holds but we better start thinking better than we are now as a group.

    • ohnwentsya says:

      Absolutely! Thinking as a group-thinking in Unity! that is the KEY to the Golden Age and to the freedom that rings it in.

      I don’t think guns will help us so I don’t think it matters if we have them or not-but I find it odd that adults who can (presumably) READ cannot seem to differentiate between a law banning the SALE of certain types of weapons, a law requiring background checks and licenses, a law banning certain types of ammo loading (hi capacity clips etc) with a law *confiscating guns*.

      We had an assault weapons ban that was signed into law under the first President Bush that lasted until the second Bush took office(or almost). Nothing very exciting happened then, no civil war, no dancing in the streets, not really any less gun buying or gun using that I could tell-perhaps there may have been a slight depression in the sales figures of Smith and Wesson and their compadres in the business, but I did not see any difference at all in my country.

      My neighborhood was still seeing nightly automatic weapons fire so obviously the “ban” didn’t remove them. (some of it was from quasi legal guns since they were military weapons owned by currently enlisted soldiers/sailors, who just happened to be risking shore patrol or something by getting plastered and shooting up their apartments, or firing into the air to “celebrate”)

      I don’t think gun bans DO anything except get people all riled up and arguing pointlessly.
      Oh and get some politicians extra donations on both sides.

      I don’t think war, whether civil or not, does anything USEFUL EVER. It makes people dead, poisons the land and causes immense suffering-can’t say any of those much recommend it to me. Oh and it makes a bunch of real creeps a LOT richer-every. single. time.

      We can win this without war, without guns and without fear-see my comment above for more on that, or just google “consent of the governed” and noam chomsky or howard zinn and you’ll get lots of background on HOW.;-)

      The golden age has already begun-just because no one came to cut a ribbon when they unlocked the cage, no one brought us breakfast in bed or a free million dollars doesn’t mean it isn’t happening;-)

      Freedom means just that-freedom to act, to choose, to create. It doesn’t mean someone solves the problems FOR us.

      We are free to recognize our Unity, to come together and act from our hearts and create a world based on Love instead of greed and violence.

      I think it would be pretty impossible to create a world based on love using the tools of violence(ie guns). sort of like making organic pasta with Agent Orange sauce…..

  7. DavidG says:

    No one will get money DOH!

    • DavidG says:

      I have heard enough. Theses guys are dissmissing it without understanding at all. It is pathetic. The alternative is civil war in America – so sad.

      • DrinkDeep says:

        well this is right back where we started – me not understanding your comment about TOPPT preventing civil war ;) Guess I’ll just wait another week and see how it plays out….or another month..or another year…haha.
        It always comes back to the same thing – Be The Change! …and have a nice evening, David

    • DavidG says:

      Sorry for the confusion. If ‘They’ get America’s guns then they win totalitarian tyranny forever. They are comming for them so either fight them in court or fight them on the battle field. Think like serpents. That is how Peoples Trust could prevent war – I hope!

      • ohnwentsya says:

        We had an assault weapons ban for a long time from the First Bush president to the second-and we didn’t have a civil war then, why not?

        The dualistic thinking of its either guns or war is a relic of a dying age, we have SO many more options that are non-violent to create change, all it takes is ENOUGH people waking up and coming together.

        All these filings and postings about “common law” etc are all disinfo distraction in my personal opinion-there have been plenty of court decisions(ie PRIOR decisions set up current law) that say common law does not trump current national law.

        In fact the US has repeatedly shown a complete disregard for both common law and international law, and treaties the US Congress has ratified(thus making them US Law). The US has proven time and again that the only law it respects is the law that comes from it’s possession of the biggest and best and most technologically sophisticated weapons.

        It does not matter one bit what common law says since the people enforcing the law always decide to favor themselves.

        The ONLY way to stop such corruption and entrenched power is to withdraw the consent of the governed.

        Not only has this been carefully explained by such intellectuals as Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn (so that it is easy to look up and understand) it has also been repeatedly demonstrated in action in such places as India, Czechoslovakia, Phillipines, Poland and more recently Egypt and Tunisia.

        We are also being shown an excellent model to follow by the Zapatistas in Chiapas Mexico, if we choose to observe and learn. (they began by using guns but have evolved to a more community based power from the bottom up model that is apparently working very well)

        The main obstruction I see is that COINTELPRO tactics are still working SO well for the powers that were.

        Divide and conquer, create division and strife in the groups seeking change and they will eat themselves leaving the powers untouched.

        The way I see it, when the “lightworkers” and the environmentalists, and the human rights people and the union people, the Black Power, White Power and Red Power folks all get together and realize that what we are all fighting for is the exact same thing-Power to the People instead of the corporations and their puppets in government, THEN we will very quickly be able to exert the kind of REAL pressure that a bunch of people with rifles can only dream of exerting on the mechanisms of power in the world.

        The simple math is there are at most a few million of the elite who see the rest of us as cattle. There are at least 6 BILLION of us.

        Short of nuking the planet and destroying themselves as well, they simply *cannot* win.

        The ONLY thing standing between we the people and a liberated planet and country is OUR own egos.

        When we recognize our Unity, we win, plain and simple. It does not matter at ALL whether we recognize this before, during or after any mythical and unlikely gun confiscation occurs, because guns are useless against hi tech weaponry and the government KNOWS this.

        They are a pacifier for grown men, to keep them quiet and not resisting in any EFFECTIVE way.

        As long as we are shooting each other, the power remains the same.

  8. DavidG says:

    OMG Paul scare tactics.. iNFLATION LOL

  9. DrinkDeep says:

    I think the answer to your second question is Yes…my (limited) understanding is that UCC filings have global standing?

    • DrinkDeep says:

      Boy, I had that wrong!! It only applies to individual states – wiki blurb:
      “The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC or the Code), first published in 1952, is one of a number of uniform acts that have been promulgated in conjunction with efforts to harmonize the law of sales and other commercial transactions in all 50 states within the United States of America.”

      Here’s some info from the New York Dept of State:
      The Uniform Commercial Code represents a general and comprehensive revision of the state’s prior laws applicable to commercial transactions. The Code provides a uniform and easily available set of rules for the conduct of commercial transactions responsive to modern business conditions and needs. In short, the purpose was to simplify, clarify and modernize the law(s) governing commercial transactions; to make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions, and to permit the continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage, and agreement of the parties involved.

      How do I know if I need to file one?

      Typically, you would not file a UCC unless you were engaged in some form of commercial transaction that involved a debtor and a secured party. A common exception is a transaction that pertains to a cooperative interest. As an individual involved in a cooperative interest purchase, it is common practice for the secured party (lender) to file a UCC Financing Statement to protect their interest.

      lol – now I’m SURE I don’t know what I’m talking about :)

      • DavidG says:

        lol reading that was as if a robot spoke it. Anyway all of our legal systems are identicle seeing as they all relate to her majesty, doesn’t that make you puke yer guts?

    • DavidG says:

      Drake is still scamming it as a package to deliver funds.. jeewizz

      • DrinkDeep says:

        yeah – but you know what? He’s responding to what people are sending/telling him, so that kinda confirms how Many people are mixing the two up? It’s kind of ironic how fouled up this has become in just a couple weeks…doesn’t bode well for mass acceptance . It’s also ironic how what D is saying is pretty much the same thing Drake has been saying since last year.
        Denise keeps saying “we’ve been together for a year”…was she on board back in the days of Deatra? And what’s with Gramy saying “I hooked up with Drake a year ago”? She used to say her sister was married to Drake?!? oye – change the subject! haha

  10. Pingback: Sandy Hook “Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!” BUSTED . . . trying again, folks . . . ~J | 2012: What’s the ‘real’ truth? | cedarridge2007

  11. DavidG says:

    Everyone seemed to assume some sort of major payout, which would of course be rediculous. The way I see it is as a tool to access the UCC for everyone without declaring ‘Freeman’ status, which has draw backs.
    I havn’t had enough time to study it all and even if I did I would miss something critical, without a legal background. So we need to look at it far more seriously.
    Say a policeman comes to take your guns, then can we use these UCC’s to demand he has limited time to show his contract and failing that, through court process can we enulify his police contract?
    It needs looking at propperly. Perhaps the confusion is a delay tactic, in which case I wouldn’t be surprised. I am waiting for somone with legal knowledge to examine these documents. Is there a catch?

    • DavidG says:

      I don’t know how it ties in with NESARA or even if it does. But as a UCC document does it have standing for everyone? so we can all stand by that document in any court on any issue?

    • DrinkDeep says:

      Thanks, David – that’s pretty much how I’m reading it too (although in my mind’s eye any ‘officer’ who comes to take my guns is not defending the constitution, so I doubt they’re going to play by Any rules other than their own?). It’s interesting that the People’s Trust has been operating pretty much under the radar for quite a while (years?), but suddenly exploded on the scene via the KP, AK and RTS sites. To be honest, it seems like it got “loud” right around the time that everyone started tearing apart the Sandy Hook story (feel free to correct me if I’m wrong on that?)…I’ve wondered more than once if it’s been broadcast as a distraction, as both seem to draw the “alternative” audience -
      I’m more inclined to accept the UCC/Trust aspect of this than I am the RTS claims – it’s unfortunate that the last week or so over there has turned into another “it’s happening tomorrow!” and then nothing happens site. I had to laugh at a comment I read today – someone was complaining about the IRS delaying the filing date until Jan 30 because they need their refund…then they went on to explain that their refund was based on Tax Credits, not actual withholding! To me, that’s a mindset that isn’t quite making the connection – if one wants to keep getting ‘credit refunds’, where do they think that money will come from? It’s just another extension of the welfare state (although I fully support anyone who has paid into the system taking back whatever they can get).
      If nothing else, I hope they figure out a way to go the freeman route without surrendering my decades of Social Security pay-in…I’d like to figure out a way to file a claim for a lump-sum payout from The Corporation. Now ;)

  12. calie says:

    Jean, On Rumor Mill News today (1/9/2013) there is a video posted titled “2013 Super Bowl in LA Going to Blow up”????? The guy who posted isn’t the most skilled but he connects many dots about the “Dark Night Rising” and the MAP and it clearly looks like the New Orleans Super Bowl in included on the map…He also shows the Sandy Hook, and Aurora Colorado connection…Please check it out and if this resonates, please send it out there…We MAY be able a avert another horrible event…Nameste’

  13. DavidG says:

    We all know it was a False Flag move to grab the worlds last bastion of freedom, American peoples guns. I hope it doesn’t have to come to that but if it does then the whole world litteraly depends on Americans to stand fast.
    Jean I know you are agianst the Peoples Trust organisation and consider them fake – You might well be right but it needs serious attention not simple knee jerk dissmisal. Perhaps we can avert bloodshed through a legal battle, wouldn’t that make more sense? We need to scrutinise these documents and report on them openly, true or false. Not head full wind to battle mode, which is what is comming.

    • DrinkDeep says:

      Hi David – from what I can figure out with the People’s Trust, they are demonstrating how to apply common law…is that your perception as well? After reading the RTS blog (and comments) I’m not sure I understand the connection you’re trying to make…how would this avoid “battle mode” in terms of preserving the Constitution?
      The filings made by Heather had to do with foreclosure and challenging false authority…and the actual People’s Trust claims are not the same as those made on Removing the Shackles. It’s all very confusing – but if you can offer some enlightenment on how this Trust (not Trust Fund, but Trust) is supposed to tie in with NESARA etc. I’d really appreciate hearing about it. I just can’t seem to make the connection – thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s