By IVAN MORENO and KRISTEN WYATT 03/05/13 09:30 AM ET EST ![]()
DENVER — A series of sweeping gun-control measures in Colorado is on track to hit the governor’s desk by the end of the month, with Democratic committees in the Legislature advancing all the bills despite a Capitol packed with hundreds of opponents and surrounded by cars circling the Capitol blaring their horns.
Gun limits including expanded background checks and ammunition magazine limits were helped Monday by testimony from the husband of former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and victims of mass shootings in Connecticut and suburban Denver.
Colorado has become a focus point in the national debate over what new laws, if any, are needed to prevent gun violence after recent mass shootings, including an attack at an Aurora movie theater last summer – a massacre that brought to mind the Columbine High School shooting of 1999 for many in the state and across the nation.
The seven gun-control measures cleared their committees on 3-2 party-line votes and are planned for debate by the full Senate by Friday. Four of the seven have already cleared the House, making it possible some of them will land on the desk of Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper within weeks.
“I think they’ll all pass. I really do,” said Democratic Senate President John Morse. “And I think they all should pass. I think any of them failing doesn’t make Colorado as safe as we could make Colorado.”
A biplane flying above the Capitol Monday warned the governor, “HICK: DO NOT TAKE OUR GUNS!” Hickenlooper backs expanded background checks and has said he’s considering a bill to limit ammunition magazines to 15 rounds. He hasn’t indicated where he stands on other measures, including whether he supports a proposal that would hold sellers and owners of assault weapons liable for shootings by such firearms.
Gun rights supporters walked the Capitol halls wearing stickers that read, “I Vote Pro-Gun.” Several dozen people outside the Capitol waved American flags as light snow fell.
Inside, retired astronaut and Navy captain Mark Kelly told lawmakers that he and his wife, Giffords, support the Second Amendment, but he said the right to bear arms shouldn’t extend to criminals and the mentally ill.
Kelly compared the different background check requirements for private and retail sales with having two different lines at the airport, one with security and one without.
“Which one do you think the terrorist is going to choose?” he asked.
Giffords, a former Democratic congresswoman from Tucson, Ariz., was severely wounded in a mass shooting in January 2011 while meeting with constituents.
Gun control opponents say the proposals will not reduce violence. They say lawmakers should focus on strengthening access to mental health services for people who could be dangerous to communities.
The bill hearings were at times testy, and included some outbursts from the audience. After one bill passed, someone leaving the committee yelled “That sucks!” to lawmakers.
“I’ve never seen such unprofessional behavior,” Democratic Sen. Irene Aguilar told the audience at one point.
The commotion at the Capitol underscored the attention the debate has generated nationally from gun rights groups, such as the National Rifle Association, to victims’ families and White House officials.
One of the nation’s largest producers of ammunition magazines, Colorado-based Magpul, has threatened to leave the state if lawmakers restrict the size of its products. Its founder said smaller magazines can be easily connected to each other and the company fears it would be legally liable if people were to do that.
Victims who have lost relatives to gun violence say it’s time for legislators to take action.
Tom Sullivan, whose son Alex was among the 12 killed in the Aurora theater shooting, was among the people urging lawmakers to pass magazine restrictions.
“He was enjoying the movie one second, and then the next second he was dead,” Tom Sullivan said.
Jane Dougherty, whose sister, Mary Sherlach, was a psychologist killed in the shooting rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., has been lobbying Colorado lawmakers to pass new gun laws. She said she doesn’t understand gun owners who worry the bills are putting a burden on their rights.
She said the Connecticut shooter used “the same type of weapon that we use in war” to “slaughter these babies” and asked lawmakers for stricter gun laws.
“We cannot wait for yet another massacre to transpire,” Dougherty said.
___
Associated Press writer Alexandra Tilsley contributed to this report.

I’m afraid that most people simply cannot see past the ends of their little button-noses. The Sandy Hook incident has been SHOWN to have been a false flag op. There’s just too damned much wrong with it in too many way. Nevertheless, even Sandy Hook residents refuse to look at anything but the propaganda and the dead children – assuming there ARE any. The caskets were ordered closed, apparently, by the government, and they were interred that way. What IS IT about “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” that people simply WILL NOT understand? If they think the deaths of a few children – most likely arranged through MK Ultra and the Mossad/CIA – are bad, just wait until the concentration camps – excuse me: the FEMA concentration/reeducation camps – are filled and any kid who isn’t young enough to take the conditioning without resistance or who has even a slight physical or mental disability is simply executed. THEN what will they thnik? *sigh* Most likely they’ll think it’s not them who goes into the showers or the guillotine room or whatever next. If Obama and the Corporate pseudo-government are not stopped, and soon, that may be a scenario we’ll have to look at, some of us from much too close!
Ian
Guns, paranoia and hatred…what could go wrong?
Mark Potok talks with Lawrence O’Donnell about gun control
http://www.today.com/id/26184891/vp/51060706#51060706
Thank you, Jean.
Ah – spokespersons for The Southern Poverty Law Center and The Nation mag.
What could go wrong, indeed.
Pingback: Colorado Lawmakers Advance Seven Sweeping Gun Control Measures In Senate Committee |
This is all just so maddening, the way the public is being manipulated so on this issue. Can’t they SEE that ‘there’s something wrong with this picture’? Why aren’t they asking harder questions about what caused the shooters to go over the edge (hint: psychiatric medications); and about all the mysterious details about both events that are going unanswered, for being unasked, except by alert followers of ‘the bouncing ball’ on the Internet??
Which ‘bouncing ball’ also includes all the measures that the Obama administration has been quietly putting in place for a national takeover, and rounding up of dissidents in ‘Re-Education Camps’, the plans for which are even available on pdf download from the Internet…
Apparently American is going to have to learn the hard way what happens when you are up against ideologues, and you decide to ignore those somewhat funny-looking sheep coming ever closer to the herd, where you are innocently minding your own business – except that which makes you an American, responsible for your own governance.
Pingback: Colorado Gun Measures | Americannationalmilitia.com