The OPPT, The UCC And The HGF – by Chris Thomas

My sense of this article by Chris is that he isn’t pretending to have all the answers, but it seems apparent to me that he has given the topic considerable thought, and all I’m suggesting here that he has asked some very important questions, which he in turn has tried to answer. Hopefully, his work will precipitate a discussion that as far as I can see  has never really taken place, and I think it is a necessary one. Please try to read the following with an open mind . . . Hugs, ~Jean

Posted by Christopher OV Admin on March 5, 2013 at 7:30am
View Blog, One Vibration
Thanks to W.

The OPPT, The UCC And The HGF By Chris Thomas.

In recent weeks, the Internet and some media has been inundated with claims made by an organisation that calls itself The One Peoples Public Trust or OPPT.
The OPPT claim that they have established a Trust bonded to the original American Constitution of 1776. They further bonded every single person on the planet into this trust and claim to act in the interests of every single person on the planet.
The OPPT claim to have filed legal documents with the UCC that make claims: Understanding that corporations, governments and banks are one and the same, an “Order of Finding and Action” was filed against the “the debtor”, a legal entity created via the UCC process which encompasses all corporate entities. The filings claim that the Debtor “knowingly, willingly and intentionally committed treason” by “owning, operating, aiding and abetting private money systems” and “operating Slavery Systems used against… citizens without their knowing, willing and intentional consent”.
In other words, all of the Earth’s resources are owned by people and not corporations or governments. This is a right given to us because of our connections to the “Creator” and cannot be contested.

The OPPT further claim that as they filed these documents with the UCC under a “non-rebuttal” clause and as the “debtor” has not rebutted these claims, the documents filed by the OPPT now become law.

The OPPT further claim that: “Lawfully, nobody can stand as a superior authority between you and your relationship with the Creator. Having removed the control-mechanisms of economy and government, the One People’s Public Trust leaves individuals in full liability, being personally responsible for themselves and for ensuring the free-will rights of others. There is no longer a structural chain of command. No rules. No corporations to hide behind. You are – as the Creator intended – a Being and a guardian of our planet and its inhabitants.”

Having read these documents and claims, my first question was: The American Constitution was not written in 1776 so what do they mean?

First of all, the only event of note that happened in 1776 was the establishment of the Bavarian Illuminati.

Then in July 1782, the Illuminati incorporated the Order of Freemasons at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad.

The American Constitution was not written until 1787 and was not ratified until the 21st of June 1788 – note: of the 55 signatories to the American Constitution, 50 were known Freemasons.

So what American Constitution has the OPPT bonded themselves to and, by extension, bonded every single person on the planet? Certainly it is not the American Constitution as everybody knows it as it was not written in 1776. Does this mean that the OPPT have bonded everyone to the Illuminati and the Freemasons?

Given that every school child in America is well schooled in the history of the American Constitution, the OPPT stating that it was signed in 1776 is, obviously, a deliberate mistake. If it isn’t a deliberate mistake, the error would negate their claim to passing a law.

My second question was: Who are the UCC?

The UCC
In several OPPT documents and emails they refer to the UCC as “Universal Commercial Code”. If you Google this name, you receive no hits – the Universal Commercial Code does not exist. But Google does come up with a number of hits for UCC and the organisation that exactly matches the OPPT’s description of the organisation with which their documents are filed is an American organisation whose full name is “Uniform Commercial Code”

To quote from the UCC’s web site: The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC or the Code), first published in 1952, is one of a number of uniform acts that have been promulgated in conjunction with efforts to harmonize the law of sales and other commercial transactions in all 50 states within the United States of America.

In other words, the UCC is, effectively, an NGO which does not have any legal powers or even the power to police the policy documents it writes. All it can do is to recommend policy to individual State Legislators and it is then up to the particular State to adopt these recommendations or not. If the individual States then decide to adopt the UCC’s recommendations, it passes laws to adopt them. The UCC does not pass laws. The UCC has no legal standing and no legal powers even within the USA let alone anywhere else in the world.

The UCC does have a legal department who check and advise on State law but their web site does not make any reference to the OPPT filings (their web site, when I visited it, was updated on the 28th of February 2013).

Other Problems
The OPPT claim that they filed papers with the UCC under, what the OPPT claim is a system of “rebuttal”.

What this means is that if the person or organisation the actions are filed against does not “rebut” the allegations within a certain time frame, the filed actions automatically become law.

There is a process, in some legal situations, whereby if an accusation or claim is made against a defendant and the defendant does not present a defence, the court finds in favour of the claimant automatically. This only applies if the claimant files their complaint in a recognised court of law.

However, the UCC is not a court of law, it has no legal standing anywhere in the world and it cannot make judgements or rulings on any document that is filed with it.
Think of it this way: You are a car salesman who believes that people throughout the world should only buy American-built automobiles. So you join together with other car salesmen who have the same thoughts and form a trust. As a trust, you then write a document containing all sorts of impenetrable legal-sounding language stating that the citizens of the world can only buy American-built automobiles, lodge these papers with the UCC claiming that unless this new “law” is rebutted within 6 months, the
trust’s idea becomes law throughout the world.

If the form of legal processes the OPPT claim to have worked in their favour was true, think how many other law suites would be brought about through the UCC and throughout the world for all sorts of bizarre rules that favour one group against another – it would be legal chaos.

This is why the use of a rebuttal clause can only be decided in a court of law.
Additionally, the OPPT claim to have access to a “higher source of information” that they call the “Eternal Records”.

I have encountered this phrase “Eternal Records” only once before and that was about 10 years ago. This was when someone set up a web site claiming to be in “direct communication” with some Galactic Council or Galactic Federation or other that they could, through the Velon, access these Eternal Records and that only the Velon had access to these records, nobody else in the Universe did.

By claiming they have access to the Eternal records, the OPPT are linking themselves in with the Velon and the Velon controlled Illuminati (by the way, the “Eternal Records” do not exist except in Velon fantasy).

Apart from the documents the OPPT have been putting out on their web site and the internet in general, there have been a number of articles written about them in alternative magazines and newspapers. There has also been a series of four articles written about them and published in the Guardian newspaper’s online edition. The Guardian Express articles were written by Andy Whiteley who is a publicist for the OPPT.

Presumably, other articles have been published in other “mainstream” newspapers but I have not had access to them.

So why would at least one mainstream newspaper publish, and publicise, the actions the OPPT claim they have made when the results of the actions claimed by the OPPT would destroy the media?

It must be remembered that over eighty percent of all media – newspapers, magazines, television, radio, book publishing and the internet – is owned by five people. All five of these media magnates are members of the Bilderbergers. The Bilderbergers are, in turn, controlled by the Illuminati.

The HGF

So who, or what, are the OPPT and who is behind them pulling the strings?

The documents produced by the OPPT have some glaring errors; so glaring that they must be deliberate.

The first time I saw anything from the OPPT; it included the date 1776 as being the date that the American Constitution was signed. I knew immediately that there was something wrong.

Then, I read what the OPPT were claiming they had achieved and the reasons why. My initial thought was: they have broken their own law as they did not ask my permission to act on my behalf, removing my free choice of actions.

HGF stands for Human Gullibility Factor.

The OPPT documents and claims have been put out there to gauge how gullible we are. The spreading of the “Drake” material was a first stage – would people really believe that someone could do what “Drake” was claiming? Most people, who were aware of the Drake claims, obviously did.

The next stage is how do we judge if people are ready for the New World Order?
Into this steps the OPPT.  How many people actually checked out the OPPT claims other than through the OPPT website? It must be extremely few otherwise nobody would be defending or promoting the OPPT.

For one minute actually think about the implications of what the OPPT claim to have achieved:
~ The abolition of governments
~ The abolition of banks and financial institutions
~ The abolition of companies
~ If governments are removed, who would supply the necessary public services that governments do?
~ There would be no emergency services. There would be no hospitals. There would be no refuse collections.
~ There would be no state financial benefits and there would be no state pensions.
~ If the banks and financial institutions were removed what would happen?
~ We have seen in recent years that if there is any threat to the banks, they immediately foreclose on loans, making people bankrupt. They also foreclose on mortgages, making people homeless.
~ If companies are abolished, who would pay wages and salaries?
~ Without the government financial benefits and without banks to turn to, there is no money supply so everyone starves.
~ Without companies, who would supply electricity, drinking water, sewerage disposal and mains gas?

In short, there would be total anarchy as the millions of homeless and penniless people fight amongst each other for the next scrap of food or the next drink of water.

The natural outcome of this anarchy is that people would look for someone to save them. Into this need for help would step the New World Order offering One World Government and a single world-wide currency – everything that the Illuminati/NWO want.

Conclusions

We do not need laws to grant us freedom of choice. Freedom of choice is the underlying concept on which all laws, and even this Universe is built. We have, and have always had, the right to act as we choose and to take responsibility for those actions. It is only when society considers that certain actions are unacceptable that laws have been written to define a punishment that is appropriate when one person has acted in such a way as to remove the freedom of choice of another. Freedom of choice is an intrinsic part of who we are and how society functions so the OPPT claims that they have written a law that grants us freedom of choice is totally meaningless.

The OPPT is a classic “Hegelian dialectic” as described by the Illuminati: the Illuminati want to bring about a situation which they know nobody would ever accept. So to achieve their aims, they deliberately bring about a set of circumstances which are so horrifying that people demand they do what they wanted to do all along – a one world government and a one world currency and a reduction of the global population down to 500 million.

Fortunately, the actions claimed by the OPPT cannot happen. Their documents and reasoning is so flawed that they cannot ever become law. But, what the OPPT have achieved is a census of human gullibility so that the Illuminati now know how to word future Hegelian dialectics to achieve their aims. The OPPT is a classic “Hegelian dialectic” as described by the Illuminati: the Illuminati want to bring about a situation which they know nobody would ever accept. So to achieve their aims, they deliberately bring about a set of circumstances which are so horrifying that people demand they do what they wanted to do all along – a one world government and a one world currency and a reduction of the global population down to 500 million.

Fortunately, the actions claimed by the OPPT cannot happen. Their documents and reasoning is so flawed that they cannot ever become law. But, what the OPPT have achieved is a census of human gullibility so that the Illuminati now know how to word future Hegelian dialectics to achieve their aims. On the 21st of December 2012, we saw the arrival of massive new energies into our solar system that are designed to bring about change. What we are seeing here is the first of the Illuminati/NWO/Cabal backlashes against this positive energy.

There is only one way to change our world from the current human-made mess, and that is to undergo soul re-integration. All of the positive energies are in place to enable this to happen. What is needed now is the will of each individual to fulfill their potential. That way, we can all gradually and smoothly change our world to one where everyone benefits without panic or problems – think about it because nobody is going to do it for you.

Enhanced by Zemanta
About these ads
This entry was posted in Ascension, Financial/economic information, Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption, Political, Spiritual and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

82 Responses to The OPPT, The UCC And The HGF – by Chris Thomas

  1. Dennis Ward says:

    After reading through Chris’s very concise insights and each of the comments above, to all of you who choose to be deluded by the rambing minutia of OPPT, The questions you need to ask are:
    1. Has any of this OPPT filing had any impact on the status quo?
    2. Are any of the governments, banks and corporations still functioning?
    3. What are the personal ramifications if I do this?
    4. Did you appoint any of the trustees?
    5. Do you personally know any of the trustees?
    6. Have you done your due diligence to determine your own status and standing?
    7. Are you registered to vote and do you vote for members of the corporation?
    8. Do you have a 401k account or even know what it refers to? If not why not?
    9. Do your children or grand-children attend public schools?
    10. Do you have any licenses for some privileged occupation?
    11. Do you accept any benefits from any level of government?
    12. Why would you register a trust under the UCC? Have you read the entire UCC? If not why not?
    13. Have you read any of the documents referred to in the OPPT info? Do you fully understand them?
    14. Have you read the Articles of Confederation? Do you understand what was being done?
    15. Do you know what type of government was established at the Con-con in Philadelphia?
    16. Do you understand that all written laws are under private copyright and therefore all laws fiction?

    As Trinity said to Neo, “Its the question Neo, do you know what the question is? What is the Matrix?”

    It is amazing to me that so many folks can be so gullible and then so judgmental to someone who is only speaking to the obvious truths of the scam being perpetrated on you and in your name? wake up folks! You must be “present” to win!

    • Jean says:

      Everyone, please give these questions consideration. To me, they have great validity. . . Thanks and hugs to you, Dennis, and thanks for your time and thought on our behalf . . . Hugs, ~Jean

  2. Pingback: Response to OPPT-IN – Roger M. – Veronica |

  3. Rose Day says:

    Why all of this ‘splitting of hairs’ when, what history is not written by the power brokers?

    1. The US Constitition is ‘almost ‘ perfect in that our founding fathers faltered in their willingness to
    address the moral issue of slavery and we have paid the price over and over.
    2. The Civil War bankrupted our country and those who provided the ‘bail out’ exacted a price that
    altered our Constitution and profoundly compromised our nation’s sovereignty.
    3. How does one put a price tag on personal freedom when the nation becomes a corporation and
    citizens are essentially collateral with no real authority.

    Kudos to OPPT for bringing the issue of true sovereignty to light.

  4. Jewelz says:

    The OPPT logo is symbolizing the British Crown along with a Pyramid and a Circle around it just like the Dollar Bill and every other alphabet soup illuminati agency of the fiction corporation deceiving people, using images that are triggering your neuropathways getting your subconscious to respond to hypnotic commands for constantly hijacking and enslaving your mind in the absolute wrong direction from where you need to BE as a human being..

    Only “fiction entities” like OPPT use “Acronyms”, Symbolic Initials to abbreviate an “Agency” (fiction) just like corporate fiction government structures that are specifically designed for herding and corralling the sheep for consumption and the list of acronyms very long. Their name is attempting to appeal to your sentimentality for pulling on your heart strings for the “idea” of unity, but there is no unity about it. Sentimentality is a superstructure covering brutality.

    People are just jumping on a bandwagon for yet another power give-away, because nothing has changed on the inside from within the individuals so they are buying into a confusing DO / BE vocabulary behaving as a bunch of spiritually adolescent cheerleaders in a pep squad rally rooting for their home team to win against the bad cabal boys, so they can go party and celebrate a victory after the big game in a quick fix to a very difficult and long problem with no sacrifice involved. Americans are party animals, all they want to do is go party

    The old fiction ways of chaos and confusion will fall away upon disclosure of the truth and you will quickly and finally BE ABLE to learn about your spiritual sovereignty, right now you cannot BE IT, while you are busy DOING things. It would require your full time attention and effort with a serious conviction in your mind in order to learn how to behave as a sovereign thinker, while your life is immersed in a fiction artificial lifestyle in the matrix DOING commerce with fiction commercial contracts at every turn of the corner in your life..

    The new form of money for an exchange of energy is your “Appreciation”.. Though, right now that is not possible, because not many appreciate anything, because people are literally starved to be recognized and appreciated themselves and have a need to be right so they can be noticed instead of BEing spiritually and emotionally well, in an effort to satisfy the appetite of their sense infatuated egos that needs the whole world to fulfill its emptiness, because of a life of being absorbed and consumed with materialism to look good in place of authenticity of what is on the inside that not many can appreciate while they are distracted by the vanity of physicality people pleasing others in a popularity contest..

    The lottery mentality is dangerous for any progress. Living a lifetime in a manufactured perceived lack and deprivation is the cause of the effect of the greed that has been put upon the backs of humanity and must be taken out of the lexicon of the thought process and requires serious work and effort for understanding for behaving correctly without being reckless, careless and irresponsible consumers never satisfied with having enough always wanting more, while the rest of the world is suffering.

  5. Francis says:

    Heather said that the Creator is both of good nature and bad. From someone who was completely unknown few months back whose name Heather Ann Tucci Jarraf equals 33 letters that could mean enlightenment but whose anagram puts a lot of negative results, these and many more should be an alarm bell to think of Illuminati’s Hegelian dialectic. It is my understanding that the Creator cannot be both good and bad. I understand that the greatest deception put to us humanities is that we are taught to believe that the Creator is of both nature when the truth is the Creator is only Love and Light and the opposite of Love and Light is not of the Creators nature.

    Heather mentions a lot about BE’ing and DO’ing and yet the very legal ficitional system that enslaved us is the very system/frequency that is suppose to free us? Perhaps we can call the OPPT as OPTTIONAL ENSLAVEMENT. As someone so gullible to have fallen into its invocation/magical envocation through its order and declaration, I went into deep understanding of its papers that it has presented and welcomed as well those of the opposition to read through the real intention of the whole OPPT thing. My honest to goodness feeling after going through both sides presentation and especially on an intuitive and cellular level, I cannot see anything good coming out from this OPPT. I think it is a danger in desguise.

    I could be completely wrong and I hope I am only if the result of the OPPT is not anarchy. It is also my understanding that HEather who is meant to be leading this OPPT and CVAC for USA does not even live in the US and an internet blog mentioned her as a millionaire herself and owns several shops in Morocco (unfortunately the link where I read this is now gone so take this with a grain of salt and if you find that link again please do share it to me or here). The very Heather who wants to bring down the American government/corporation is not in America. Alarm bell doesn’t it?

  6. Arjen says:

    I read the article…checked out the blog…had already googled UCC…everyone should consider this for themselves imo. And…1776 was the signing of The Declaration of Independence . Personally I am still researching and investigating and attempting to understand what the OPPT is. Chris has some very good points. And it is my personal experience that when a group of people want to live and/or work together they have to make agreements etc.. It happens. You can not be attached to material things, and this is good, and while on the Earth plane, you may find that you need some material/physical supports to participate in life with others. I appreciate that people are striving to understand , more thoroughly, what this is all about and if it is really positive and of good intent.
    With Love and Thanks,
    Arjen

    • Jean says:

      In my opinion, Arjen – and I haven’t checked people out, the folks at OPPT may be well intentioned and they may really care, but that alone does not make this project a valid one. . . Hugs, ~Jean

  7. Papa joe says:

    How would you envision another age coming into full fruition? Does OPPT provide an avenue into a golden age? Try to imagine all inhabitants of this planet suddenly on the same plane financially. The love of money is the root of all evil and the current monetary system most definitely proves it. A paradigm shift we are experiencing for sure. A LEARNING experience and what a wild one. I agree that humanity does need this shift to go the way of the people and corporations no longer considered to be people as they are not human at all. Humans would not destroy their own habitat willfully and knowingly but OBVIOUSLY corporations WILL. I think most would agree that technology has been suppressed that could have prevented current global dangers we face today like nuclear plants and the burning of oil which humanity never needed in the first place. Putting what I stated here into perspective I have to agree with OPPT and the foreclosures of all the corporations that have created their very own world with them at the top and ruining not just the food but the water too. Corporations are a danger to our species. Just saying and kudos to the person in charge of this blog I feel Jean is genuine and that is rare these days. Thanks Jean

    • Jean says:

      Papa, thanks for expressing your opinion – and thanks for your kind words. Folks may begin to see from the various opinions that have been expressed so far that OPPT is far from an open and shut case. I believe everything is moving forward exactly as it is meant to move forward, and that whatever OPPT actually is or does, it is serving the Universe. . . but then, so are you, and so am I. It is not necessary that we all move forward in lockstep. Diversity and a variety of viewpoints is, in my opinion, absolutely necessary before we can get a clear picture of the situation as it is being presented to us. Hugs, ~Jean

  8. Eddie says:

    Here you can no more about all 600 class WORKSHOP of the laws.
    http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&cmd=tc

  9. Damon says:

    This is so dis-empowering! No one has the authority to control another without their consent. The current Governments of the world, govern without consent, via force. Their authority is fiction, just a mere idea, a negative program running in an endless loop within the mind, programmed by naughty controllers, who are nothing more than a group of people. If the OPPT provides an avenue, an excuse, a story, that legitimizes an individual not needing to bow down to a fictional authority then it is a good thing! Don’t let endless debates water down the ‘TRUTH’. The OPPT in the above sense is far more useful than channeled messages that tell us that ET’s or Obama is going to save us.

    IMHO – Peace and Goodness,
    Damon

  10. Human-beings have unalienable rights as provided by our Creator, which negate any requirement for man-made law.

    No Human has the right to act on behalf of another Human-being without mutual consent.

    While Humans quarrel Rome burns .The State of the Species. http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/7146

    • adriane says:

      Doreen,
      one could state that a return to a former situation as a result of the end of a contract –to participate in the experiment of incarnating into a fake reality i.e. the illusion– already refers to an implied consent in that all of the people did know that the experiment was of a temporary nature.

      So, in other words we have already consented when we entered this contract to come back to a reality that was there before the illusion was created. This is my interpretation of what the trustees actually did.

      This does not curb our freedom because for those who would want to enter the world of service-to-self for instance there is the possibillity to do just that…it is all up to the individual.

  11. Birgit Jonas says:

    to truly have a result that is just good and great it has to be created from the heart. Now I truly can accept that!

  12. Birgit Jonas says:

    When I first found out about OPPT I read thru the documents, which was difficult to understand. Its not layman´s english but legalease. I tried to contact the 3 trustees and no email or phonecall was returned. I listened for a little bit, connecting with my heart. When I listened to Heather she was so in the know about everything of the Creator of the Universe and everything else! And when she stated that God is both, good and bad and how she said it, sorry, that did it for me. The Source of the Universe is love and in balance and we are moving up in consciousness into 5 D or higher which is unconditional love and not a continuation of struggle. And to me its clear that sovereignty must be claimed internally first to appear externally. Do not be lemmings, never mind how great this all sounds, as sovereign beings we have to connect to our hearts. One thing D. Melchizedek said is: If we create from our heads, we will have results that are both, good and bad

  13. estherpap says:

    As a point of clarification re: 1776 – I just randomly went to the first document I found on the OPPT website…on page 2 of 13 of the Amendment to UCC 2000043135 (found on http://www.peoplestrust1776.org/ – Entry of Debtor, 2011 & before) in paragraph #2 starting with “Indefeasible Title” there is a clear timeline delineating dates beginning with the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776 to the reorganization of the Articles of Confederation into the Constitution of the United States of America on March 4, 1789.
    There sure has been an awful lot of energy and opinions flying about to debunk the OPPT by so many people…gosh how many people have taken the time to actually read these documents?
    Read them and decide for yourself if what is said resonates with you — take what you want and leave the rest…and in kind create a space for others to do the same.
    If anyone has any questions direct them to the Trustees or email Lisa Harrison and she will address them on the OPPT radio program.
    My deepest heartfelt thanks to Jean for your dedication & service with your blog. Infinite gratitude to ALL for showing up to play.

  14. Lynne Rassbach says:

    The OPPT does not talk at all about 1776 facts or fiction.

  15. Francis says:

    Is he asking valid questions? YES
    Have I made statements that have any validity? WHAT STATEMENT?
    We have done what we have done in spite of our imperfections. . . and you throw stones at us. . . but, have you checked out our facts? WHAT FACTS? I CHECKED THE 1776 FACTS AND WIKIPEDIA SEEM TO VALIDATE THE DISCOURSE OF CHRIS THOMAS

    What are the two questions?

    • Jean says:

      It just shows-to-go-ya’ how carefully you folks read :) In my own post, I suggested there were two statements being made that are incorrect, and I marked them in RED. . . and it appears most people didn’t even understand what I said . . . Hugs, ~Jean

    • Jean says:

      Francis, you’ve come closer than anyone. . . Hugs :) ~Jean

  16. Francis says:

    Are these your questions below?

    Is he asking valid questions?
    Have I made statements that have any validity?
    We have done what we have done in spite of our imperfections. . . and you throw stones at us. . . but, have you checked out our facts?

  17. Lynne Rassbach says:

    What are your 2 questions about the OPPT, Jean? And I’m wondering why you haven’t considered both sides? Odd for you…

    • Jean says:

      Lynne, I think my two questions, which were generally marked in RED in my own post this morning were pretty clear. You can see for yourself. I suggested that one statment, posted in a widely circulated article was not valid, and I also suggested that another statement I made all on my own was valid. . . I asked folks to tell me I was incorrect. Both were marked in RED.

      It’s pretty frustrating that everyone simply appears to have flown off the handle because I would dare to question anything at all about OPPT, but apparently more than a couple of you don’t have any idea that all I asked were a couple of questions. . . which no one has taken the time to answer.

      To be truthful, Lynne, I’m pretty sure I know the answers, and I have already stated those answers many times on my blog, and if I am correct, then I believe the entire validity of the OPPT premise must come into question. I’m not faulting the work these people have done or are doing, but to really go anywhere, they really have to have the entire picture, and I just don’t happen to think that they do. I’d be delighted to be proved wrong, and I can assure you I don’t have any ego involved. I’m just looking for the ‘real’ truth. Instead of hollering at me and Chris, all folks had to do was answer my questions, and no one did. If I’m incorrect, I’ll have to shut up and go away, and I will. Instead, it looks to me like they just flipped out at both of us . . . I hope I’m making an incorrect assumption here :)

      Hugs,
      ~Jean

  18. Francis says:

    I been reading this blog and noticed that the pro-OPPT (apart from one or two I guess) are sounding like crusaders and seem to have missed the point of Chris Thomas’s blog. Also, don’t shoot Jean as the messenger, everyone should do the same thing of putting the pros and the cons especially if the material being put out is a new material from an unknown sources. The pro -OPPT would really benefit themselves and will liberate others too by looking deeply into the history/family/motivation/connections of the three trustees. It’s fine and dandy that they sound lovely and that goes without saying of course that people at the time of Hitler thinks he was lovely too.

    Pro-OPPT people should really direct their energy by writing to Chris Thomas rather than what seems to be a cyber bullying to Jean for giving Chris’s blog a space here.

    Those who purports to be loving OPPT repliers are sounding really like crusaders. Try ask Heather and the three trustee and see if you will ever receive a reply to your e-mail. I been reading the post on an OPPT blog and a lot of them are discouraged that only those with access to alternative media like people who made names for themselves are getting a response back from Heather and those who are just individuals are saying they are being ignored despite several e-mails.

    Time to really re-think what the pro-OPPT people are putting their energy into. Do not shoot the messenger here. Jean is not Chris Thomas. Direct all your energy to Chris or Heather and ask them the questions till you are satisfied that you got the answer outside of yourselves.

    • Jean says:

      Thanks, Francis, for this very reasonable statement. Still, I did ask two questions, and no one – not even those you call crusaders – has answered them…I think that’s interesting. . . Hugs, ~Jean

      • Raine says:

        We are not shooting Jean for being the messenger…we are asking her to present both sides….only fair…..

  19. gillfinn says:

    Uh oh, hope you get a lot of juice for your blog while it lasts. This guy has not done his homework on the OPPT. Wouldn’t it kind of not make any sense to go to such elaborate lengths to put together a scam that one guy on the internet could shoot full of holes in the time it took to write his article.
    All you have to do is email the principles, get a little intelligent discourse going and THEN form an oped piece. Then again, maybe he’s not gonna make a career out of truth, and I guess that’s called, free will.

    • Jean says:

      You’re all so busy taking down either me or Chris – and that’s what I call judging, but no one has yet been able to answer my two questions. Why? Hugs, ~Jean

  20. Lynne Rassbach says:

    OMG…just got home and reading down thru Jeans blog. More dis-information about the OPPT from her/you. Jean please read the filings. Do the research you often do. For example, have you actually heard BlogTalkRadio and Lisa Harrison’s radio shows, which completely cover all questions about OPPT and interview the actual Trustee? They are on for an hour or more every Monday and Tuesday, and have been since at least the beginning of January. Have you guys seen the changes occuring throughout the World in regards to Finance? At least present both sides of this, Jean! It is obvious you are riding the train of ignorance here.

  21. Francis says:

    “But in 1796, signer Thomas McKean disputed that the Declaration had been signed on July 4, pointing out that some signers were not then present, including several who were not even elected to Congress until after that date.[93]

    According to the 1911 record of events by the U.S. State Department, under Sec. Philander C. Knox, the Declaration was transposed on paper, adopted by the Continental Congress, and signed by John Hancock, President of the Congress, on July 4, 1776.[94] On August 2, 1776 a parchment paper copy of the Declaration was signed by 56 persons.[94] Many of these signers were not present when the original Declaration was adopted on July 4.[94] One signer, Matthew Thornton, from New Hampshire, who agreed to the Declaration and having joined the Continental Congress, signed on November 4, 1776.[94]” Here is a simple copy/paste from wikipedia of the debate on 1776. Believe what you want to believe of course.

    Why the kind of reaction from a simple blog that gives voice to the other side of the debate, it seems that people has already made up their minds even with the scrutiny in place.

    • Jean says:

      Francis, it must have been your Comment that I read while gone today, although I’m just now seeing it here at home. I would think the actual date of the signing would be important in a legal framework, and I think you for giving us this info . . . Hugs, ~Jean

  22. DavidG says:

    This just gets stranger – I don’t know what agenda is afoot here but it smells.

    “the only event of note that happened in 1776 was the establishment of the Bavarian Illuminati.”

    Did you all forget about the Declaration of Independance 1776?

    I like to seek all angles and hear words of wisdom but all I am seeing and hearing are horrific fear mongering oppinions based on nothing. Jean – What are you doing?

    • Maiden PEI says:

      Quote from Chris’ post:

      “The OPPT claim that they have established a Trust bonded to the original American Constitution of 1776.”

      Chris is pointing out a FUNDAMENTAL DISCREPANCEY in that the original American Constitution was NOT signed in 1776!

      I remember hearing Heather explain the origin of the Trust that the OPPT “reclaimed”, but I don’t remember for sure what she said it was bonded to.

      I spent an hour going over my notes on the OPPT & searching the OPPT official site as well as other sites about the OPPT & all I could find was this quote from Heather as part of the January 4, 2013 AK post: “Updated: TOPPT – Transcript: A Conversation with Heather Tucci-Jarraf, Trustee of The One People’s Public Trust” at the following link:

      http://americankabuki.blogspot.ca/2013/01/toppt-transcript-conversation-with.html#more

      “…December 11 of 2010 I was introduced to someone who was involved with this thing called the Public Trust.”

      Of course, I could very well have missed it, somewhere, but I would think that this would be FRONT & CENTER . . . easy to find . . . on the official OPPT website.

    • Raine says:

      Exactly……Jean is just posting negative bashing articles……very one-sided….and not even bothering to contact Heather and the gang…they should come looking for her…a bit egoish Jean…..

  23. Jewelz says:

    Suzy, you can certainly believe what you will. Though no one else can DO anything for you. It would be a codependent relationship otherwise. A sovereign is one who is able to stand on his or her own. OPPT is a power give-away in the absolute wrong direction. I did listened to the interview with Max and he does not understand what is going on with a fiction system to explain it, just like most folks. I even wrote him and told him so. It is much too deep to articulate in this box. If it was all so easy to figure out then we would not have a problem now would we. Heather cannot free anyone from anything, let alone herself.

    The issue of subject matter jurisdiction is at the root of the trickery causing much grief to people in their lives by not understanding your own identity, which as I mentioned has been stolen and you don’t understand it to explain it..The burden of proof is upon he who is making the claim, not upon the one who denies it. The court must prove subject matter jurisdiction over your body and not otherwise.

    The presence of your body in the courtroom cures the error for the fiction name listed on a piece of paper on your drivers license from your birth certificate. Certificate means death, your birth certificate is a death certificate and you do not own it. The corporation government had you listed as dead on arrival at your birth and you are treated as such. You had a “live” birth, you did not have a “life” birth.

    If you were born in the US you are absolutely NOT a US citizen, unless of course you have actually applied for US citizenship. Have you applied for US citizenship? No? Then you are not a US citizen and the government cannot tell you that information. You are only under the assumption and made to “think” that you are a US citizen, because you applied for a social security card, a drivers license, or any other kind of license, but that does not make you a US citizen. So the constitution does not apply to you, you are not free and you have no rights and you are treated as such. Period.

    There is nothing the matter with people coming together and learning something, though in the case OPPT, it is draining peoples valuable considerable time and energy in a bleed off in the absolute wrong direction, by spending your valuable time filing complicated laborious fiction documents that require much study to understand what you are actually involved in DOing, that will be leaving the scene with the implementation of a new Common law system anyway.

    Your time and energy is much better spent learning about your emotional and spiritual sovereignty as a Human Being and how to behave as a sovereign thinker in an effort to get along in a relationship in harmony with a fiction artificial system, without going to war in an argument creating controversy, which, is completely different to the way people behave right now divided to be conquered for separation, where the truth is stranger than fiction..

    You can learn on your own by studying and reading online and finding other like minded people interested in joining a discussion. Although, those kind of people might be far and few between to find anyone that is serious about it.

    • Jean says:

      Jewelz, although some may not like your acerbic way with words, I have to agree with what you say here. . . I think you’ve got it right, and I also think that last three paragraphs are particularly important. They address our value systems. . . Thanks for sharing. Hugs, ~Jean

  24. Francis says:

    Thanks a lot Jean for publishing this on your blog. I have followed the work of Chris Thomas and read some of his books. In my opinion, he come across as a very reasonable man, he is cautious and research his staff diligently before puttng them out into the public. This is the impression I got from reading his books. Anyway, as to the OPPT – I was one of those who jumped into its ship so readily without investigating it further so one can call me a gullible person because the truth is “I AM”. But with the advent of some inputs I tried to really look deep inside me to know why I was so gullible to the OPPT. The reason I found is that – “because I was looking for someone to save me or rather save us all from our sorry state” then of couse I realized that there is really one man who can saved myself and that is myself – and in all honesty I do not know how to do that just yet apart from getting a bliss from meditation. It looks arrogant I think for those who might have fallen to the category of being “gullible” and not admitting their mistakes. We all makes mistakes and the best remedy to heal yourself is admitting when one made a mistake.

    I wish the OPPT people all the best and I do hope they can bring relief to those people or even the world but one also hopes that it will not lead to that dreaded nightmare which starts with the word “One” as in one world government. As to those defending the OPPT and sounding like crusaders, have a look at the mirror and listen to the vibrations of the words that you are writting, does it really vibrates in harmony? People are hurting and insecure and hugry NOW and no amount of 5D language can save them from that hurt so the best way of BE’ing and DO’ing is really to investigate further and look further into both sides of the equation for and against the OPPT. I for one has not really closed the door of OPPT but I will not give my energy to it or to those against it untill I am really sure and have all the “Absolute Data” on hand – which none of us has at this point.

    • Jean says:

      Francis, I have not followed Chris Thomas’ work before, but I was also impressed with the reasonableness I sensed in his writing. Hugs, ~jean

  25. Suzy says:

    Here is what Max Igan has to say about OPPT. For more of his thoughts go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk1Q2kNnAsM&feature=player_embedded
    MAX: The heart of the OPPT is the UCC filing that says that “if you BE, you are answerable only to the Creator.” Now people may look at this, and all the parts of it, and it’s interesting all the filings they went to to get to another filing, all interesting.
    Interesting stuff. I’ve heard a lot of discussion about it and a lot of opinions about it
    but I’ve never heard anyone actually debunk the filings.

    And the essence of this really, as I see, and I could be wrong, this just my idea, but the essence of this is it’s all a corporate system, every government is a corporate system, I’ve done films about it that one the real problems that we face is that the entire human experience has been reduced to commerce. I mean it’s all commerce. You go to a magistrate’s court and it’s a commercial court. You get a parking ticket it’s a commercial
    activity. The interesting thing with this is that all commerce comes under the Uniform Commercial Code, the police come and gives you a form, it’s commerce, the government gives you a form and you play by their rules, it’s all commerce, so that is the system that controls us, and the UCC controls every aspect of commercial activity on this planet. Well isn’t that American? It doesn’t matter, every one has to operate under this code.

    So what I say is what the OPPT has done, is they have made this filing through the UCC, and some people are saying, “oh they’re enslaving us through the UCC,” and no they are not, what it is saying is that if you Be, if you are alive then you are no long subservient to anything without a contract basically because you are only answerable to the Creator, whatever you perceive the Creator to be. And if you are going to come along a impose your system upon me give me a fine, anything like this all of it comes out of UCC. So that’s okay give me a fine, give me a parking ticket whatever, say you have jurisdiction over me, happy to agree, all you have to do is debunk this filing, rebut this filing under UCC that says I am only answerable to the Creator because if you are going to come and use me for commercial purposes and expect money from me then you are claiming that you are a higher authority to my Creator or you are claiming you created me. So you need to rebut this filing, because if you are using the UCC against me you can’t do that while this filing stands. That’s really the heart of it, to me it makes sense, that one particular aspect makes sense.

    I’ve heard a lot of talk about the the CVACs, I’ve heard a lot of talk about digital currency, about all of aspects of this, and I’ve had trepidations and thinking
    well, this is almost too good to be true, but it comes down to that filing and in all of the opinions I’ve heard that anyone has offered, I have not yet heard anyone rebut the filings.

    So what I would say to those people out there who are speaking against it, like Tami Pepperman and Winston Shroud and (?) I love all these peoples’ work and I think we should all work together on this because this could be something quite good so with everything I am hearing these people say, what I would like to see from all these people is someone rebut these filings because if this whole corporate system comes under UCC law and this filing stands unrebutted in UCC law the it stands as law . What Heather seems to have done by using their tools, she has freed us from their law should we choose to be free.

    The system remains, it’s still there, it’s all about contractual agreement, if you want to continue to grant these people their jurisdiction, that’s fine but it doesn’t hurt to ask the question that if you are going to exercise a right of ownership over me or claim that you can you can do commerce with me on a system that exists under UCC law then you sure as hell better rebut this filing that says that says because I BE, because I am alive I’m only answerable to the Creator, because if you can’t rebut it then you can’t use the UCC system against me to extract money from me, that’s what I see in it.

    I’m not interested in the CVACs or in the 10 billion dollars or whatever I don’t care,
    I just want to walk into the forest and build a house, I want to be free of the system. I want to have the tools to show that I am free. Because I kind of use this stuff anyway, if I’ve been if I have been in a position where I’ve had to stand in the power of my flesh I’ve done so.

    I’ve never understand why anyone could claim to have a right of ownership over me
    and that’s all I’m really seeing, I’m seeing that someone has done that for the world
    And they these people say, “well she didn’t get permission to be trustee for me, who gives her the right…” Hey, if you are are going to build an alternative society to free yourself then you all you are doing is running away and hiding and allowing the world to be destroyed around you and eventually you will be eaten up later and I’ve often said that ‘I don’t want to rise from the pile, I want to take the pile with me, and I don’t want rise from the ranks, I want to take the ranks with me.‘ If there is one person enslaved then I am enslaved and I don’t want to go and build an alternative society, I want to fix this one.

    What is the point of making a UCC filing or something like this to free yourself if you don’t bring the rest of the world with you?

    If someone is going to complain and say “well I didn’t say she could be the trustee for me, and perhaps they are going to use this system to enslave me,” well, how can they unless they can rebut the original filing that says you are only answerable to the Creator? Because if they are going to create anything, any maxim, any law, any guideline within the CVAC that is going to affect you in a way that you don’t want to be affected then I would have to rebut their original filing which is unrebuttable because you are only answerable to the Creator.

    So that’s my opinion on it and If you want to prove me wrong, and you say I’m falling into some trap, well hey, this is the way I have been living my life the last 55 years and it’s worked for me and now I just see it as the UCC filing and to me that’s heart of it, that original filing that says you are answerable only to the Creator. All the rest of it is irrelevant.

    How can this OPPT can create any slavery if it remains unrebutted. I heard Tami Pepperman saying, “how would this stand with the Hague?” The Hague? The Hague is fiction, how could the Hague stand between you and the Creator?

  26. Seraph G. El says:

    Someone wasted their precious time and energy posting this to my OPPT page yesterday…
    In the interest of my time and energy, I will post my reply here, but before I do, I have never seen so many “bloggers” who post whacky notions from Drake, Poof, and “Salusa”, give credence to Fulford and Wilcock, and back their assumptions and predictions to the wall, but when a group of humans are trying to release of all from bondage using the EXACT METHODS that the cabal used to enslave us, there is all of this ego-driven resistance… “It doesn’t resonate with me…” Hogwash. Just call it as it is: Because it’s not happening the way YOU envisioned it, it’s discounted out of hand, with absolutely no research WHATSOEVER. This guy has obviously done no actual research, because had he done so, he would not have placed himself and his followers into such a dim light. And now Jean, you say he’s not required to do any? Well I guess you are technically correct; he doesn’t…which explains 90% of the posts on this and several other blogs about the aforementioned writers…Research goes both ways…I have extensive conversations with the trustees of OPPT, whereas every detractor has done little if any. I don’t play the “awakened” game, which means I am fully ok with, and capable of calling these shills to the mat. Ask questions, and you get answers…don’t like the answers? Ask more until you are satisfied, but when you have an invested interest, be it ego-driven or otherwise, in this NOT being a legitimate way to escape slavery, then you need to check yourself, seriously. Nobody is asking anyone to “believe” anything in The One People’s Public Trust…no believing, signing, vowing, nothing…someone took a stand, and others felt it necessary to stand with them, thus a movement that has grown faster than any other “consciousness movement” to date. Are we doing so wrongly, or unjustly? Time will tell, right? Now here is what I posted yesterday, and to my knowledge, still no one has come forward to legitimately rebut…

    This is nonsense, rubbish, and all disinformation…However, I will allow it to remain on my page. Why? Because some people are here on this planet to provide “The Contrast”… Good job. I will post here for the second time, what was posted for all detractors… I have heard a few question the “validity” of The One People’s Public Trust, as well as allegations of all types of nonsensical theories…

    So called “experts” in law, trusts, and UCC, as well as so-called “consciousness movement” spiritualists, and various bloggers who have made a reputation backing some really crazy, spooky, mumbo-jumbo…

    In the interest of clear, as well as “diplomatic” dialogue, I will quote Heather Tucci-Jarraf, trustee for OPPT, when any detractors and naysayers arise, be it public or private…

    “great!!!!!!! If there is a dispute, error, or falsity, make AND deliver a duly verified sworn DECLARATION OF REBUTTAL to the duly verified, sworn and REGISTERED OPPT DECLARATION OF FACTS, point by point, with specificity and particularity, with full responsiblity and liability, under the penalty of perjury under any law you identifiy, that the forgoing is true and accurate, signed by your wet-ink signature.”

    (cricket-cricket-cricket-cricket…)

    Yeah, that’s what I thought…

    • Seraph G. El says:

      Shameless Attacks on OPPT: If anyone would like to argue with the OPPT information we are ALL sharing from our Eternal Hearts to the world, please read carefully…

      “OPPT is all about Unity, Absolute Truth, Transparency and LOVE, Abundance for all, ‘selfless’ service to others to attain freedom and help them understand who they are, the positive list goes on. We are ‘not’ required to justify or debate. We are simply putting information out there to help people, out of love for ALL BEings.”

      …..If further to reading this statement anyone still wants an argument please direct them to the Argument Clinic….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y

  27. Jewelz says:

    Chris Thomas quote: – ” OPPT is a census of human gullibility so that the Illuminati now know how to word future Hegelian dialectics to achieve their aims.”
    —————————————

    Excellent report Chris! The reason OPPT is so popular and receiving so much attention goes to show you just how incompetent and mind controlled people are. They are looking to be saved from an outside source, any source, rather than facing and accepting the responsibility to save themselves.

    People refuse to let go of the fiction artificial realm they have become so comfortable and familiar with and convinced is totally real. In exchange for not being able to predict an uncertain future with the loss of control by living in the now moment to moment.

    The OPPT idea is getting people involved in a power give-away, for not knowing themselves how to teach people what sovereignty is about and how to behave properly when dealing with fiction entities that operate in controversy keeping people in a constant argument defending themselves. Fiction cannot deal with real living people and real living people cannot deal with fiction ghost corporations. They cannot hear each other and that is why you have a life of chaos and confusion.

    The OPPT is attempting to make something that is very complicated requiring much sacrifice and study to sound easy, instead of helping people understand what sovereignty is about. Their effort is taking away individual responsibility from the people in a spiritual esoteric war with a fiction entity, who cannot actually deal with real living people. That is why those ghost corporations have to scare you into doing it, whatever IT is, is fiction.

    Those OPPT documents sent to collectors will prove to do nothing about nothing with the attorney representing the plaintiff bringing the claim in the case and they will just ignore their paperwork. They know the people are incompetent and are not serious enough and do not know their rights, or their standing with the jurisdiction issue, simply by the type of paperwork they are sending.

    They will look at it and throw that stuff in the trash and further test the peoples knowledge by serving a summons to appear out of no where like Casper the Ghost in court when it eventually comes down to it.

    These OPPT people can chant they are free all they want, but that does not change the fact that everyone was born to be an incompetent slave thinker, stuck living as a smiling depressive in a consensus trance in the matrix of illusion, unable to come out of what they find themselves in, because they are not serious enough as a heart attack and they don’t mean it. It requires a serious commitment and is a full time endeavor, no half measures will do.

    If anyone desires to take back their life from those they have voluntarily given their power and authority away to, they absolutely must mean it with a serious conviction and be serious as a heart attack, or you can forget about it. Right now, the truth seems so strange that you don’t trust

    You absolutely do not know how to behave properly as a sovereign Being, after living a lifetime in a fiction, artificial, materialistic realm “Doing” things of no substance for any real value, for any real meaning whatsoever.

    People are very clearly confusing the issue of sovereignty with filing a UCC document in order to become a member of yet another codependent organization who cannot help you. You don’t all of a sudden just obtain personal sovereignty by filing fiction documents with a fiction entity after living a lifetime of chaos and confusion in a fiction realm made for deceiving you and become free.

    They are spending their time playing around with fiction things that do not exist, expecting a ghost corporation to answer them with an apology out of a mouth it does not have. Sovereign beings have no business trying to engage with fiction entities and that is what they are Doing and they don’t understand it to explain it to you..

    The Uniform Commercial Codes are FICTION and are for Doing COMMERCE, Commercial Contracts. There has been a wave of people who were attempting to gain sovereignty through a UCC contract. This is possibly the biggest carrot that has been placed before the people to hinder them from true sovereignty, and to coerce them into consciously transferring their birthrights, rendering them ineffectual, because; you are born sovereign and you cannot transfer, buy or sell your sovereignty. Efforts in doing so is called “slave Trade”.

    These OPPT folks are about 10 years too late and are giving people the impression of something new, simply by repackaging something old and making it sound as if everyone can be saved by filing fiction paperwork that is soon to be buried at the bottom of the deep blue sea with the implementation of common law with the new equitable financial system.

    The governing structures will be reformed along with it in order to help the people change their undermining fiction belief systems for the better, because the people have proven themselves incompetent to accomplish that great feat on their own and will not voluntarily go out of their way to change and risk losing what has become so familiar.

    • Suzy says:

      Wow. Unbelievable. Chris’ article was bound to generate this kind of response. Now OPPT is from the Cabal. Fear leads to fear. Jean, is this really the way you want OPPT vetted by your site?

      • David Gagin says:

        Wait a while, Suzy; It has been said by OPPT proponents that they used their own system against them, that is, the UCC. How do you do that and come out ahead? It is THEIR system. It is for THEM to use. Anyone not a part of THEIR system hasn’t any business using it for any reason, let alone getting the upper hand against them. So, she shows proof of their filings. I looked at them. There is, however, a disconnect between what is being boastfully said on various internet talk shows, and what those documents say. I might agree with some of the sentiments expressed by Tucci and others, we definitely ARE living in a debt slavery system, but you have to get on the right train to arrive at your intended destination.

        BTW, the author is correct: the UCC isn’t law. It is a set of standards created by international organization pertaining to COMMERCE to aleviate the confusion because there were so many different standards. It is NOT a ruling, or legislative body. But you go right ahead, believing what you’re told is misinformation; when push comes to shove, your UCC filings and a buck-59 will get you a cup of coffee.

        I’ve been following this since it became public. Sounded very interesting at first, but my spidey-sense warned me to not jump on this band wagon. You cannot use a system against itself. You have to come up with an alternative system because any system that has lasted as long as UCC has, is designed to protect itself. OPPT hasn’t done so, not as far as I can see. What they have done is get a bunch of people excited about their sovereign rights, but doing what will turn out to be even more egg. I’m not saying this is a hoax, scam, or back-engineered psy-ops right now, I’m just saying uh uh…this ain’t gettin’ it.

    • Anthony Goodman says:

      Well… You sound pretty pissed off! You’re words smack of someone who sees the rest of humanity as worthless, ignorant, rabble and therefore undeserving. (Familiar?) To me, that’s a tragic expression of unmet needs… unmet EGO needs. It seems that the OPPT ‘phenomenon’ is a threat to your identity as a skin encapsulated ego, so you disparage the other manifestations of your True Identity and spit contempt at them.

      Jewelz… you seem to me to be screaming out “Look at ME! I did it the hard way. You lazy bastards. Why should you get to be equal with me. It isn’t fair..!” Or at least, that’s my interpretation. You’ve clearly put a lot of time and energy into your research, and I truly respect that, but the old paradigm of separation is OVER NOW. The new paradigm ushered in by the REGISTRATION (which happens to have been through the UCC) of the OPPT’s unrebutted and unrebuttable claim that every human being is a manifestation of Creator, experiencing by Creation, sees beyond separation, beyond polarity, beyond judgement, blame, criticism, reward and punishment and beyond right and wrong. I have no wish to make you wrong here. I wish to raise your awareness out of separation and into a grander view of humanity, all free from having our creative energy sucked out of us by that ancient vampire (the slavery system) whose insidious presence reaches into everyone’s lives in one way or another.

      I understand that you think everyone should work as hard as you had to in recognising and asserting your freedom, but that’s the very nature of the Beast. It’s keeping your own view narrowed to an ego perspective. Again, I don’t mean to make you wrong, just aware that the ultimate ‘elephant in the room’ is still in your room. It can only be slain by starvation, which will only happen when enough people wake-the-fuck-up. The very least that can be said about the OPPT is that it’s waking people up to the elephant in the room, and that’s got to be good for everyone. Can you see this, Jewelz? You’re a trailblazer, and we need you with us to co-create the new paradigm, putting an end to fear and competition, and co-creating a new world of love and co-operation.

      Much love…

      • Jean says:

        Instead of judging Jewelz and verbally trying to take him down, perhaps you might be able to separate his style of writing from what he says. I guess I’m suggesting this for two reasons: 1) Judging others is really about ourselves – what is the joy in doing that, really? – and 2) I happen to think Jewelz has it pretty close to being right. . . for whatever my thoughts may be worth to you. Hugs, ~Jean

    • wokbee says:

      Jewelz you are right on we are all free always have been you don’t get something for nothing it takes hard work and never giving up. Jean you are great and fair and make us grow up and think, about time. GOD gave us a brain about time we started use it. thank to all of you GOD bless

    • DavidG says:

      Jewelz, Despite everything, there is nothing complicated about soveriegnty. We all have an index finger to flip. Complication is a mechanic to control. The fiction has been dissolved by fiction, believe what you want to believe.

      What is your definition of an equitable finance? And how will your ‘common law’ come to fruition?

      • Jewelz says:

        DavidG, you can try to over simplify something to satisfy yourself where you cannot explain what is very complicated otherwise about what you do not know anything about, if it makes you feel better.

        Though, it does not change the fact that your identity has been effectively stolen from you and you have been taken into a fiction realm where your thoughts and mind is being used by another entity to administer punishment you have done to yourself, through counterfeiting, without your knowledge of it ever taking place and you don’t understand it.

        Your entire life is fiction. The fractal in nature and in your nature has been broken. We have spent our entire life answering to fiction corporations who do not exist, using a made up fiction language talking fiction out of the side of our mouths, never understanding the words being spoken, to know what we were really and truly saying to ourselves or anyone else.

        If you think there is a government, then your thinking is in vein. The judicial system does not use Webster dictionary, they gave that to you and me for us to use. Incompetent Chattel property slaves were not meant to behave as sovereign beings, having any power and authority as the creditor and beneficiary of a trust, because you have lived your entire life in servitude with idea in mind that you are of a debtor status, that you owe someone something there is nothing of – money, in order to pay for something that never was – debt..

        With the implementation of Nesara all cases on the books are stopped. That means no more Admiralty Maritime UCC fiction codes and statutes, they will not be effective any longer in the courts with the Common Law structure of Nesara..

    • Jean says:

      Thanks, Jewelz. Hugs, ~Jean

      • DavidG says:

        Jewelz, I do fully understand all you report. Nesara was an American solution for an American problem in the 1980′s. The problem is global but that was not widely appreciated then so you have an American constitutional solution in Nesara. Today the problem is recognised globally so one band aid will not heal the hanging limb that needs removed.

  28. OPPT & Slavery Through Intellectual Conscription By Deceit Part One Love For Life Arthur Cristian

    Part I http://youtu.be/Qjp_9nlrBao
    Part II http://youtu.be/tbybeOWZ-Bc

    This video is an explanation about why you should not sign the OPPT, unless you FULLY comprehend it and agree to what you are signing up for. We saw the problems with the OPPT within about 30 seconds of looking at it but, rather than just pointing out the problems, we have gone into the details of WHY the OPPT is written as it is, why it is having the effect it is, why you might feel like signing it and where it will lead you if you sign it. Arthur & Fiona Cristian

    To discern fact from fiction, minimize distraction, and enhance inner peace, perhaps consider I Ching as a mirror for your own inner truth. http://wp.me/pR2D2-ji

    • Jean says:

      Doreen, I will have a look at this, for sure. Thanks for adding in a very positive way to our finding the ‘real’ truth. Calling people names, etc., etc., etc. does no good. The truth can hurt, but it will set us free. Let’s find it . . . together. I’ve only asked folks to prove Chris’ allegations – and mine – incorrect. So far, no one has done so. . . but I will keep on trying so that perhaps in time folks may truly ‘hear’ me. . . I’m not taking sides; as always, I’m looking for the ‘real’ truth. Hugs, ~Jean

      • Well we’ll just have to wait and see. I know we are fooled by many,because we keep hoping some one can help us. I personally believe in OPPT. amd I don’t see the harm. it is a teaching vehicle and we are learning and it has worked for some already. I am gona keep hoping it is real,untill I have a reason not too.and I believe that the way they did this was the only way it could have happened, working from the inside. I have a good feeling from all of them,so that’s what I will go on. your heart will tell you what’s true or not,if you are in touch with your heart,it will guide you.

    • Kestrela says:

      The whole diatribe is so full of mis- and dis-information as to be laughable…STARTING with the description! Quote: “This video is an explanation about why you should not sign the OPPT,” There is nothing to sign, you have full, free-will choice, and it does not threaten anybody in any way. Try again.

      • Jean says:

        Look, I published this video because a well-respected blogger, who visits my blog, suggested I post it. I was gone for the day, but I’m sure it had a lot of info in it for people to consider. A respectful response from my readers is one I always appreciate, and, by the way, I’m still hoping someone can answer my questions . . .
        Hugs, ~Jean

      • Kestrela says:

        All I can say, Jean, Is go to the source. At their website, all 3 trustees have contact info posted. If you want a real, true, and Absolute answer, why rely on the ‘peanut gallery’? Heather is lovely to talk to, Caleb is a very sweet man. Absolute transparency is what they swore an oath to. Seek and ye shall find.

      • Jean says:

        I think these people follow my blog. If they are interested in answering my questions, let them post their answers here. As I’ve said, I’m not really looking for the answers for myself, but I am trying to make a point. I believe I already know the answers to these questions, questions I deem to be extremely important. If the OPPT people can’t/won’t answer them, that’s okay. . . Hugs, ~Jean

  29. adriane says:

    Chris needs to take a little more time to delve somewhat deeper before sharpening his pencil. That would be my advise.
    On the other hand, this provides ‘contrast’ as trustee Heather calls it…which can be seen as an invitation to a more indepth scrutiny of certain principles and some misconceptions and stumbling blocks that keep coming up…so it’s all good, we are moving along here :)

    • Jean says:

      Thanks, Adriane, as always for your balanced viewpoint. If these allegations are incorrect, there is no need to lash out at anyone, or call them names. All anyone has to do is prove it – not only Chris’ allegations, but mine, as well. It seems to me this would do nothing but further solidify the foundations of this movement. Hugs, ~Jean

  30. Metta Mori says:

    Wow, Chris is letting his issues and fears show through. Chris doesn’t give the people of this planet any credibility to be able to truly govern themselves. I’ve been following OPPT since it was released and see this as THE way. I truly don’t believe that Chris has done his homework as there are many many avenues to find out more information about OPPT. I totally agree with Suzy – go girl!

    If Chris understands OPPT as well as he says he does, he needs to follow Heather’s advice as stated here in a question and answer session “Heather: “great!!!!!!! If there is a dispute, error, or falsity make AND deliver a duly verified sworn DECLARATION OF REBUTTAL to the duly verified, sworn and REGISTERED OPPT DECLARATION OF FACTS, point by point, with specificity and particularity, with full responsibility and liability, under the penalty of perjury under any law you identify, that the forgoing is true and accurate, signed by your wet-ink signature.”” So Chris, where is your Declaration of Rebuttal?

    Jean, thanks for your opinion but OPPT has given me a new lease on the future. OPPT is not making any promises and continue to tell us that whatever we do is our decision. We finally have a blank canvas and we’re determined to make the future a fabulous one!

    • Jean says:

      Metta, you are entitled to your opinion, and to your ‘new lease on the future.’ It’s your choice. I’m also entitled to my opinion, and while I think OPPT has brought many issues to the fore, I don’t think the future is going to happen the way they say. Again, my opinion. By the way, I don’t see where it says ANYWHERE that Chris is REQUIRED to follow OPPT’s suggestions for rebuttal. . .

      It seems to me no one is addressing the substance of Chris’ or my allegations, because they don’t like the form these allegations have taken. If we are incorrect, let us both know. At this point in time, Chris and I have not ‘spoken’, but I support his right to make these allegations (and my right, as well) in any form he chooses to do so. It is up to OPPT to rebut them honestly, again, if they choose. . .

      I like the attitude that most of you have regarding the future . . . that is all to the good, but I do not think that OPPT has the key to your future. . . Again, that is my opinion . . . and I may well be proved wrong about it all . . . but I have held my tongue for a very long time on this matter, and I do not speak lightly.

      Hugs,
      ~Jean

      • Raine says:

        Jean, you seem to just post the negative articles in relation to this topic….how about being fair and posting also positive articles and let us decide what we resonate wiith…not you taking your own stand and trying to shove it down our throats……my gosh you still post things from Drake, and we all know how sound his predictions have been….

      • Jean says:

        Raine, positive articles are all over the internet. You can find them there quite easily, I do believe. I’m not shoving anything down your throats. That may be your perception of it. Frankly, I don’t really care what you all believe about this; it is your choice, and I do not want any responsibility for what you choose. In my opinion, though, no one has shared very much of the downside at all, and I happen to think there is a downside. If you don’t agree, I’m okay with that. If you don’t like what I say, you don’t really have to read it or even comment on it. Just go right by it. It’s all up to you, but remember, please, that I also have a choice, and because I happen to have a blog, I finally decided to share my choice with you all. Again, what you do with what I share is up to you . . . Hugs, ~Jean

  31. daleykd77 says:

    whomever wrote this blog is a total douche bag!lol I mean really? If you want people to take you seriously then do your R&D, period. No one wants to hear someone rant on about something they don’t have a clue about. Get a clue.

    • Jean says:

      This statement has no substance, so is of little value as far as I can see. Give me the facts; rebut what Chris has stated, and rebut what I have also stated. Then I will take your words seriously. Hugs, ~Jean

      • Indio says:

        Alternative OPPT http://one-heaven.org

      • Sean says:

        Almost everything is false from what I’ve read in his bloggggghhhrrrr seemed like vomit it was so off!

      • Jean says:

        Sean, if you will forgive me, these sorts of comments aren’t really helpful to us here. If you could give us some facts we can hang our hats on, we would really appreciate it – just one or two, with links that prove his statements false. Hugs, ~Jean

  32. Raine says:

    This article is probably from a shill Suzy, or a Cabal faction tryig to throw daggers at this movement….I resonate with it like you…it will be interesting to follow this dialogue….

  33. linda says:

    Well written, Chris.
    I don’t expect anyone to save me in any way, neither here, there or anywhere. Only I can do that.
    As for the OPPT: when it’s too good to be true is probably isn’t. I see your points (I’m not an expert but they do seem very reasonable and realistic).
    “Sadly”, we must do the work ourselves, bit by bit, and many are doing it – that’s great. We can win, we just have to persevere in creation and action.

  34. Suzy says:

    Wow, wow, wow. So much misinformation. Why didn’t this blogger contact the Trust and try to get some answers before he just publicly blathers away. Controversy is good for his blog, obviously. I’m sure there will be a detailed response from the Trust soon enough and all I can say is what a monumental waste of their time. Rather than really researching, really digging in to who these people are, their extraordinary integrity, humility and desire to serve, and what these documents are really about, the author would rather nitpick bits and pieces he doesn’t really understand and then blow them up as coming from the Cabal. What! And sorry Jean, could say the same thing about your approach to OPPT. What you don’t take the time to understand you attack, however indirectly you choose to do so. Woof!

    • Jean says:

      Suzy, it seems to me you are looking for perfection, and I think that is totally wrong! Chris made an effort to do some research, and while it might have been wise to check with OPPT before publishing it, I don’t see any requirement that he do so. Did people from OPPT check with others who know a bit more about some of these things? I know for a fact that they did not. This, Suzy, is just an indication that we live in an imperfect world. Maybe I understand more than you think, and believe me, I am not attacking anyone or anything. That is how you are choosing to see this.

      You may not like the way this blogger approached this and you may think I am merely attacking something I do not understand, but put that aside for a moment, and look at the facts. Is he asking valid questions? Have I made statements that have any validity? We have done what we have done in spite of our imperfections. . . and you throw stones at us. . . but, have you checked out our facts?

      Perhaps this wonderful ‘educational movement’ could not have been achieved any other way than by sucking people in to something that makes promises that I happen to believe cannot be fulfilled. However, it has happened, I have already stated that its educational value is great. It might be even greater if you all are willing to go beyond what OPPT has stated to see more of the truth . . . and, yes, I might be very wrong, but I don’t think so . . . I don’t have ego involved. I’m making statements based on info I have gathered over a period of time, info which well might be flawed. Just prove to me that it is flawed, and I will easily go away, or retract my thoughts as being incorrect. As I have already said, I would love to be wrong.

      Hugs, ~Jean

      • Lisa says:

        Chris’s message resonates more than that of the OPPT, thanks for publishing Jean. Would be great to be wrong, but we’ll see soon enough x

      • Maiden PEI says:

        Hi Jean . . . thanx! for posting Chris’ article . . . both the Annunaki & OPPT info resonates with me . . . I feel as you do about the OPPT . . . .feels like a stealthy Illuminati trap to me.

      • daleykd77 says:

        What is really interesting is that you and chris actually take the time to argue OPPT, (without even doing your R&D) which is a movemnet that is for the good of all. Not to mention there is ABSOLUTELY no harm that it can bring to anyone, if you do not believe in it look away, no one is making anyone do anything, what bad would come of giving it energy and spreading the truth.. They have stated several times that no one needs to file paperwork or do anything for it has allready been done. They created templates that one can use if they choose to exercise their BE, once again not even required to do so. So why the negative posts about it anyhow? I mean the only ones to not want it to be valid or those that are working for the cabal elite or they themselves.

      • Romell Hueck says:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence
        Created June–July 1776
        Ratified July 4, 1776
        the moment you mislead me in the ratification of Our declaration I you want to make me as ignorant as you!

    • Sean says:

      His story was so full of flaws. Makes me wonder if he is Illuminati?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s