Source: Zen Gardner
Thanks to DA.
by Zen Gardner
People have been asking me what I thought of the OPPT (One People’s Public Trust) movement. I’d hardly noticed it as these types of things rarely appeal to me, but I decided to look into it a bit. This is my opinion and observations based on what I’ve seen so far which isn’t much because actually there isn’t that much to be found. What I share here is based on my personal experiences, research and intuition, so take it for what you will.
The purpose of this article is not to explain what it is, which you can research for yourself. I’m addressing the subject for those with at least a cursory knowledge of this issue who are wondering about the nature of this movement.
I’m not about to tell anyone what to do, but I’d watch my step with this OPPT movement. Something doesn’t seem right to me. There are too many warning flags going up right out of the gate.
I can understand people looking for a coalescing movement to express in some potentially practical form their desire to effect change, as well as to provide a unifying sense of solidarity. I also know human nature is prone to looking for cure-all solutions, external sources of salvation, dynamic charismatic leaders, and a reason for hope. For many this is also a chance to put the burden of personal choice and decision making down a bit and rest on some sense of collective force, imagined or real.
It’s a frustrating life watching the world being crushed with seemingly so few practical ways we can fight it. That’s how movements form, and I understand that. But anyone would be wise to be very careful where they throw their weight in this maze of dis-information and misdirection infiltrating society, and the alternative research community in particular.
What Is the OPPT?
Here’s their own description:
The One People’s Public Trust itself consists of every person on the planet, the planet itself and the Creator.
The One People’s Trust trustees are a talented group of very skilled individuals including legal professionals who, in conjunction with a positive group inside the financial system, carried out extensive investigations into the massive fraud and theft taking place at the time.
After exercising extreme prudence, the OPPT concluded that the corporations operating under the guise of the people’s government and financial systems were committing treason against the people of this planet without the people’s knowing, willing and intentional consent. Through a series of REGISTRATIONS of the BE’ing of the one people of this planet, the land, airs, seas and every creation thereof and therefrom, all unlawful and illegal claims of ownership and actions of management and control by the principals, agents and beneficiaries were lawfully and legally duly cancelled and foreclosed upon by their own free will choice not to remedy the damage they had caused.Source
I feel hijacked. They roped in me, you, and everyone else on the planet…including the Creator…just like that. Where did they get that permission? Didn’t get mine. Pretty presumptuous if you ask me.
Why I’m Suspect
I’ve been seeing the increasingly evangelical calls to “OPPT in” to this movement around the net and started looking into it. I admit I haven’t studied everything although there was quite of bit of looking while working on this article and really there’s not much to be found besides the hype. I still don’t understand this whole thing, which is part of what bothers me. Either there’s not much to understand or everything’s deliberately vague.
I’m judging by how it appears to me and its effect on me, so take it or leave it.
No doubt there is merit in some of the thinking and mechanisms involved, otherwise it wouldn’t have any credibility. Although I’m starting to wonder if that’s even true. We’ve seen this non acceptance or recognition of the system’s legality or authority before and it has worked in many civil cases. Canada has something similar going on with the common law court case against the British crown and Canadian leaders in the recent genocide trial. They are statements of protest and generate public awareness.
But participation is effective only as long as our outlook and understanding of the real problem is fully conscious and we’re not reinforcing their system, intentionally or not. I don’t mean to be a downer but some systems just aren’t worth saving nor fighting for, or even acknowledging. Especially when the real enemy is something way more powerful working behind the scenes pushing both sides of every conflict. (Think Rothschilds and hold that thought.)
The weird thing is even as you try to get more information from their websites you get directed here and redirected there, with slim pickins for information along the way. Look at any “system” public trust anywhere and the disclosures and mission statement etc. are up front and clear as a bell. They have to be. Then OPPT claims “millions around the world” are turning on to it which all the jazzed up followers are parroting. Sorry to tell you but one website shows clearly they’ve only had 60 thousand hits and the other states 200 thousand. Hardly millions, even assuming everyone who visits “joins” or gets behind it, which of course is statistically impossible. In fact, it would most likely be a small percentage of the total exposure at best.
So where’s the millions? It smacks of an energy pyramid scheme to be honest.
I listened to Max Igan’s interview with the main organizers of the OPPT movement. From the outset it was vague and confusing. If it weren’t for commenters on my site asking about it I would have turned it off. It started off with a premise that was clearly meant to appeal to one and all in any alternative mindset…the political activist to the new-ager:
“It’s all over. We’ve already won.” Weeeeee.
Sounds way too familiar. Another full spectrum appeal to the activist crowd like other grandiose promises and phenomena we’ve seen come and go. What really rubbed me is the elusive, assumptive and patronizing wording in this entire interview.
The American lawyer was the main spokesperson and she couldn’t have been more vague and confusing. It was not aimed to educate clearly, but rather to snow you under with impressive sounding knowledge and so-called inside information.
I’ve seen professional con men at work and that’s exactly what they do.
First they grab you with a “big idea” appeal and a vision of some wonderful end result they know you’d love to hear. Then they go on to give you a not so clear but grand sounding method on how they propose to do it. The trick is to do it so seemingly authoritatively and with all kinds of complicated language, showy credentials and hearsay testimonials to back it up that you get swept up and “taken” by it without fully grasping anything.
It’s classic sales speak and manipulation.
The kick off is a doozey. “It’s already over” they say. “We’ve already won. The PTBs have been served their papers (thanks to their perceptive, hard work and ‘inside’ contacts) and we are now free. Now we just need to act like it.” And you are swept under their umbrella by the very definitions they propose. Isn’t that exactly the complaint they’re making of how the PTBs get our permission by overarching maritime laws via birth certificates and other automatic contracts?
And by the way, thanks OPPT for telling us we’re all free, but we already knew that. You didn’t need to tell us that and we didn’t need a piece of paper filed somewhere to make it “official”. The whole system is a lie and you addressing it like you’re going to dissolve it on their level is ludicrous. And then to go on to say it’s already done and filed in some secret special department is more mind games and condescension.
Worse than that, it smacks of controlled opposition propaganda and manipulation. That’s what worries me.
And who comes out the saviors? All these knowledgeable insiders with all their legal apparatus and most of all whomever they’re connected to, all while saying it’s the people’s trust. And where do the followers and buyers of this plan all march? Wherever the pied piper leads them.
Wanting to believe something doesn’t make it true.
I’m sure they expected eventual backlash over this next point which is why the fancy legalese-spouting American lawyer said it. About 40 minutes into the interview as she’s bragging about how through her qualifications and contacts she was able to attain all this “empowering” information on how to dismantle the entire structure, she says “by way of disclosure I need to tell you that the man who showed me all of this is a trustee with the Rothschilds’ family holdings.” She goes on to say this shows “there are many people within the system that want to make sure you guys (not we) know what’s going on.”
WTF? And the interview rolled on like nothing happened.
Click Here to continue reading.