OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1

Source: BabylonDecoded.com
Picture1

The OPPT promotes the use of a Courtesy Notice (CN) amongst its followers. The stated purpose of the CN is “To politely and powerfully notify all alleged “ corporate agents ” who seek to interact with us, of the foreclosure of the world’s corporations, including all “ banks ” and corporate “governments” and the subsequent capacity in which recipients act upon receipt of this notice, namely as individuals with full liability for their actions”.

For those considering the use of the CN and are looking for a second opinion we have conducted an unbiased, unemotional and objective analysis of the CN in several parts. All the information presented is transparent and you are free to check the legal definitions yourself. The article is presented for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Please always seek your own legal advice in regards legal documents that you are considering signing.

Further, this review should not be construed as an attack on the document. It is simply an unbiased and unemotional analysis of the material to enable you to make up your own mind.

The first and foremost thing to understand about the CN is that it is a legal document that defines rights, duties, entitlements and liabilities, no differently to any other contract, will, deed, promissory note or share certificate. This should be no secret as OPPT also tell you this in their Courtesy Notice guideline document.

Now let’s look at the details point by point. Any text in bold and italics is from the Courtesy Notice while normal text is my commentary:

Page 1

The personal details of the Respondent and the Proponent are in separate boxes. A name inserted within a box is specific to corporate identities. Respondent means the party against whom an appeal is taken, in other words the person that is being sent the CN. The Proponent, which is you, the person sending in the CN, means a person who puts forward the contract for consideration or acceptance.

In other words, if you are offering this document to another person, you are offering to enter into a legal contract with that person. The respondent is accepting it as an appeal, which means that you are prepared for this matter to go to a higher authority and have the matter dealt with in a court of law.

Unlimited personal liability arising from foreclosure of all banks, all corporate governments and all other corporations by UCC filings of the One People’s Public Trust. (OPPT)

This statement places personal accountability on you for any action that may occur because of the termination of another entity’s rights to property by the OPPT. In other words you are personally liable if the wronged entity decides to seek satisfaction, which could include going after your own personal assets. These entity’s include banks, corporate governments AND corporations.

This statement clearly establishes that by signing this CN and using it, not only has the power of another entity over yourself and your assets been removed, but you have accepted that your personal corporate powers including any legitimate contract you hold, have been removed and you are now under the control of the OPPT.

DULY VERIFIED DECLARATION OF FACTS

This makes the statement that you are legally, and through a witness to your signature, agreeing to this document and everything that may occur to you because of that agreement.

I am the sole lawful and legal REGISTERED owner, custodian, and trustee of my BE’ing, any and all creations therefrom and property thereof…

This paragraph states that you are making your oath of ownership to contract to the OPPT. ‘REGISTERED’ means entered in a public registry, enrolled formally, recorded, filed. ‘BE’ing’, in all caps is the dictionary definition of Bills of Exchange. The ‘ing’ turns it into a doing word. ‘Creations’ refers to the act of making something that has not been made before, the making of a new life.

In other words, in this oath you are establishing everything you are giving into the contract, past, present and future. This includes the following:

  • Your de jure rights – your nationality, which includes your standing and your inherent rights as a claim to God;
  • Your de facto rights as provided by government;
  • Any item you have registered under your legal title;
  • Anything you own;
  • Anything you hold custody of – specifically your children;
  • Anything you are trustee for – your will and assets on behalf of your children, your one share

    and one vote in your constitutional structure of government;

  • Your ‘self’ as an asset of value – collateral;
  • Your children and other creations that emanate from your body and mind, which includes

    your DNA;

  • Your property of any kind and form that exist because of your body and mind; and
  • Property you now hold and any property you may hold in the future.

    …UCC Doc. File No’s 2012127810, 2012127854, 2012127907, 1012127914 restated and incorporated here by reference as if set forth in full, original

notice of DECLARATION OF FACTS by public registration made and given by the One People’s Public Trust, hereafter “OPPT”.

Why does it say these filings are ‘restated’? My legal dictionary indicates that a Restatement is a specific form of formatted documentation that is not binding on a court unless it has been officially adopted as the law by that jurisdiction’s highest court.

The UCC documents are established as the documents of a corporation – that being the OPPT – in this CN through the reference to the DECLARATION OF FACTS. So anyone planning to use the CN would be very wise to have read and absorbed ALL the details of that DECLARATION – and any and all other documents that relate or are involved in it, prior to using the CN in any way.

The CN effectively creates a contract between the person and the OPPT corporation.

I have and do knowingly, willingly, intentionally adopt, reconfirm and ratify said DECLARATION OF FACTS as my own duly verified due DECLARATION OF FACTS, nunc pro tunc praeterea preterea, unrebutted as a matter of law, as a matter of fact, and as a matter of public policy, hereafter “Proponent”.

This is a clear oath of acceptance, freely and willingly entered into, with full knowledge of the outcome, giving formal approval.

It is interesting to note the use of the word ‘ratify’. That is a legal term specific to Treaties. It indicates that one sovereign is agreeing to a contract with another sovereign. In international law the final establishment of consent by the parties to a treaty to be bound by it usually include the exchange or deposit of instruments of ratification.

The Treaty being enacted is the DECLARATION OF FACTS, which is unknown in its implications (still to be analysed). However, you are now claiming it for your own use and have verified that with a witness, making it an enforceable legal instrument over you.

Nunc pro tunc praeterea preterea, loosely translated means “Now for then, thereafter, further”. In other words you are binding yourself to the DECLARATION through treaty, for the past, the present and the future. Now read this closely:

  • That means you are agreeing that this treaty can never be undone. You and your children are bound forever;
  • You are accepting that the filings have not been rebutted in any court of law, under any facts or as a matter relevant to the whole of society; and
  • From now on you have legally adopted the role of the Proponent.

    The conclusion is that this document is a treaty between yourself as a sovereign, corporate, legal and equitable person and an organization of undisclosed political & international ramifications, wherein you give yourself and your personal property and rights (both past, present and future), as outlined above, to that organization for ever. Think about the implications of that.

    To be continued in Part 2.

Enhanced by Zemanta
This entry was posted in Ascension, Financial/economic information, Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption, Political, Spiritual and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1

  1. Pingback: OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1

  2. Jean says:

    Thank you so much, Suzanne. I wish I had time to reply privately, but events are moving forward now very rapidly. Love and hugs, ~Jean

  3. mkb says:

    This is where the intellectual folds in on itself and becomes insane. There can be no true “agreement” between parties of this kind. it is patently insane and a violence against all that lives — since life implies change, and these documents and their organization are attempting to willfully remove your right to — evolve! Just reading about it insults my being. I am, however, grateful to have the legalese translated into a real language that can be understood by the people. Thank you for explaining this horrific gesture on the part of whomever would dare to express it. Perhaps this is proof that the cabal and all who serve ideas of enslavement are just a big cosmic joke and a test to make sure we are aware that we must protect and evolve our own sovereignty !

  4. Alex says:

    Okay…. i’ve been reading all of the postings herr relating to this topic. I have deliberately refrained from commenting for one basic reason… that reason is that I simply do not have inside intimate knowledge of this situation for me to make a “right, wrong…. true , false” judgement. I also don’t. feel a need to. What the idea is basically FREEDOM. Freedom from what we all know is a corrupt system and a greedy gross negligence of our responsibilities to each other and the planet. Now… we have that in common lets focus on what unites us and not what separates us. My suggestion to help with the negativity is to position your views and opinions in such away as to highlight common goals that help us envision the way forward. We all must work together or we will surely hang together.

    • Jean says:

      Alex, I ask you to cut me some slack. I am one person and I’ve been overwhelmed. I don’t always get it right . . . I’m doing the best I can . . . Hugs, ~Jean

      • Alex says:

        Dearest Jean,

        That was no criticism of you. That was a general observance. You are doing an amazing job!!! I know you are privy to more than you can share. I thought it might help to remind those who don’t have all the facts that we need to focus on the commonalities and goals and reserve our judgements. Please don’t take my comment directed toward yourself my dear.

  5. Nick says:

    Sounds like 666 stamped on your forehead to me. No Thanks. I’ll stay me and poor but happy.

  6. Pingback: OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1 | Paul Short's Blog

  7. BroAsa says:

    Having completed two of law school I’m not sure what’s the purpose of invoking the UCC. The UCC is asset of laws devised by the self-same corporations and governments to codify and bring into same usage “agreements” as opposed to “contracts” for sales of goods and commercial transactions. The UCC provides the bases upon which commercial transactions are handled so that everyone knows what to expect. For example, it provides the “agreement” that allows a merchant to accept your check because he knows what the bank will do when it’s presented. Over simplified but more or less the general concept.

    Sounds very much like what the group “we the people” were advising people to do about their taxes. In that case scores of those people who followed their advice are now serving time in Federal prisons. Not some government simply a violation of laws that have been in place for nearly fifty years. One has to be careful when dealing with the government any act designed to prevent the collection of money due any agency is an act to defraud the government.

    Attempting to defraud or obstructing the collection of money due any government agency carries a maximum sentence of 20 years. That extends to obstructing the collection of government guaranteed home loans and student loans. To advocate or assist another person to do such an act will get you the same sentence under conspiracy to commit.

    When playing in this ballpark, I suggest you use a lot of caution until the teeth has been pulled from the monster.

  8. Apparently, many are perfectly conditioned for similarly situated social engineering via fraud and misrepresentation, from which they scurry back & forth from allegedly. And furthermore, proceed to re-establish the same fruits of their oppressors, as if such behavior now stands justified. For example: “This statement clearly establishes that by signing this CN and using it, not only has the power of another entity over yourself and your assets been removed, but you have accepted that your personal corporate powers including any legitimate contract you hold, have been removed and you are now under the control of the OPPT.”

    Is this statement no different than the alleged XIV Amendment, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution?

    Does any reasonable individual bankrupt themselves for the sake of safety or security by agreeing to support a political system in, which they may not openly question the public dept? Or rather, does any individual honestly desire to be compelled under the control of another, in whom no meeting of the minds, has arisen honorably? Heaven forbid….!!!!

    Most graciously ‘In Honor We Trust.’

  9. Doug Behrends says:

    The OPPT is dissolved. Has been. Along with all the others. Homework!!!

  10. Carol K says:

    This is highly enlightening after reading Peter Eyre’s 10 part series…………My head is reeling from the disclosure of things about the law that were not known before. But this OPPT is an eye-opener after that. You can see that you are willingly enslaving yourself to this group with your own pen. Now I wonder how or why we would need to do this if as Peter says, we are already there? Does having a birth certificate make us slaves owned by “them”……? We are to agree to give up our rights to our own DNA? Do we even know if we have already been harvested at an ordinary Dr. office without our knowledge? If the planet already belongs to the Papacy and Jesuits, is there any hope left to untie the knots of ownership? WHAT A TOXIC MESS we are in?

  11. Doug Behrends says:

    I’m just waiting for the words in italics. So far the ‘all caps’ must be code or something.

  12. Pingback: OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1 | Americannationalmilitia.com

  13. Pingback: DARK CABAL INCITES INDONESIAN TURMOIL TO HIJACK GLOBAL SETTLEMENTS | Towards Healthcare Emancipation

  14. Nick says:

    The OPPT promotes the use of a Courtesy Notice (CN) amongst its followers. The stated purpose of the CN is “To politely and powerfully notify all alleged “corporate agents “who seek to interact with us, of the foreclosure of the world’s corporations, including all “banks” and corporate “governments” and the subsequent capacity in which recipients act upon receipt of this notice, namely as individuals with full liability for their actions”.

    For those considering the use of the CN and are looking for a second opinion we have conducted an unbiased, unemotional and objective analysis of the CN in several parts. All the information presented is transparent and you are free to check the legal definitions yourself. The article is presented for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Please always seek your own legal advice in regards legal documents that you are considering signing.

    Further, this review should not be construed as an attack on the document. It is simply an unbiased and unemotional analysis of the material to enable you to make up your own mind.

    The first and foremost thing to understand about the CN is that it is a legal document that defines rights, duties, entitlements and liabilities, no differently to any other contract, will, deed, promissory note or share certificate. This should be no secret as OPPT also tell you this in their Courtesy Notice guideline document.

    COMMON LAW dictates that ” one should do no harm”.. Are we there yet?

  15. Nick says:

    This would be considered if one agrees
    that the OPPT is “a corporation”,,,but the filings they undertook dissolved “ALL” corporations, governmental, judicial and financial,,””ALL”” corporations ,,,so how does he get to the point of declaring OPPT that which they have foreclosed on? Just askin?””

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s