Germany Still Wants Gold Back – Repatriation Campaign Continues . . . a correction it seems to an earlier story today . . . ~J

Source: ZeroHedge
June 24, 2014
Thanks to K.

More than 18 months ago, on January 16, 2013 Germany’s central bank, the Bundesbank, announced that it will repatriate to Germany all 374 tonnes it had stored with the Banque de France in Paris, as well as 300 tonnes held in Manhattan by the New York Federal Reserve, by 2020.

Despite a lag of 18 months, the Bundesbank, as the Federal Bank of Germany is often called, has only managed to bring home a tiny 37 tonnes of gold.

A paltry 5 tonnes of that came from the U.S., the rest from Paris. The US Fed holds 45% or roughly $635 billion of the total 3,396 tonnes of gold Germany have in reserve, the world’s second largest gold reserves.

This has prompted, not surprisingly, renewed questions whether Germany’s gold still exists in those Manhattan vaults or if it has been melted down, leased or even sold.

With doubts about the whereabouts of Germany’s gold still prevalent, it appears that either Chancellor Angela Merkel’s ruling coalition or the ECB, has decided to attempt to put the matter to rest.

Bloomberg reported yesterday that the German campaign to repatriate German gold from the U.S. has ended. The Bloomberg story was headlined ‘German Gold Stays in New York in Rebuff to Euro Doubters’ and the first sentence was ‘Germany has decided its gold is safe in American hands’.

However, the leader of the German gold repatriation movement, “Repatriate our Gold,” Peter Boehringer immediately refuted the Bloomberg article and posted in the comment section at the bottom of the Bloomberg article:

Just to set the record straight re this article in which my name is mentioned and in which I am quoted out of context:
a) Bloomberg uncritically cites statements of politicians and BuBa-bankers who have or give no proof whatsoever re the untouched whereabouts of the german Gold.

b) Re our campaign “Repatriate our Gold” “On hold” does of course NOT mean that we are in any way satisfied with the current status of BuBa´s ongoing repatriation (far too slow and too little – only 5 tons came from NY in 2013! Not exactly a proof for the untouched existence of 1500 tons in a NY vault unaudited since 1950…). Our public campaign will therefore have to continue.

c) Almost no info in the article can be considered in any way “news”. Simply because there has not been any material news in this context since early 2013.

d) Especially the headline is plainly false, because there has not been any change in BuBa´s (too slow) repatriation plans: at least 300+ tonnes will come from NY by end 2020. It is not much – but contrary to the headline, BuBa has NOT stopped the ongoing partial repatriation – enforced solely by public pressure!

e) The political party “Alternative for Germany” has never been part of our campaign – they can therefore not have been “rebuffed” as the article suggests.

f) The political party “FDP” has (with the exception of one (1) MP ) never demanded a repatriation – yet another false info in the article.

g) Some politicians cited in the article cannot in any way claim to be “in charge” of the german gold hoard (abroad or not). This holds true for both Mr Barthle and for Mr Hardt: BuBa alone is in charge – and officially, BuBa is independent from political influence…

Summary: a “non-news” article with a wrong headline, strange interviewees, old news, and with a clearly apologetic ideological approach: the main purpose seems to be NOT to give space to the myriad of unanswered and extremely relevant questions BuBa and the Fed have been refusing to answer for decades. Please read more at “Repatriate our Gold.”

See article and comments here: ‘German Gold Stays in New York in Rebuff to Euro Doubters’

The Bundesbank’s move to repatriate 674 tonnes of the German gold reserves from Paris and New York to Frankfurt in January 2013 was a victory for openness, transparency and for those who have campaigned for transparency in the gold market for years.

The move by the Bundesbank to be more transparent about the location of gold reserves was welcomed by many market participants as most believe that central banks should have to disclose simple facts about their gold reserves – such as their quantity, where they are held, whether they have been lent or swapped, and so forth.

The fact that the Bundesbank had been nudged into new-found transparency was a victory for the groups of investors – most prominent among them, the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee or GATA – that have for years been asking central banks to reveal their holdings and activities in the gold market.

Those who have dismissed the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee or GATA as “conspiracy theorists” have yet to acknowledge or refute the voluminous documentation and evidence that GATA have amassed over the years.

GATA have long made a strong case that certain banks may have been manipulating gold and silver prices lower. In the same way that banks have been proven to conspire in rigging LIBOR, interest rates and foreign exchange markets.

The campaign to achieve a free market in gold and silver prices will continue

This entry was posted in Financial/economic information, Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption, Political and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Germany Still Wants Gold Back – Repatriation Campaign Continues . . . a correction it seems to an earlier story today . . . ~J

  1. Ruby says:

    I think I am going to start digging a bunker in my backyard as an anti-confiscation measure!

  2. Ilex says:

    Jean, I had no idea it was this big either; it’s amazing what you find when you go looking! Add Finland and Venezuela to the repatriation list!!

    http://wealthcycles.com/blog/2013/09/23/finland-latest-to-push-for-vote-on-gold-repatriation

  3. DET says:

    To readers:
    all above are MSM news;
    Buba is not independent; CEO of Buba, Jens Waidmann, was introduced
    by chancellor Merkel.
    Really Germany is still listed as enemy-state at UN; therefor all gold of Germany
    is confiscated due to Military Law SHAEF 52. This is in fact our and your
    problem; as long SHAEF-law is in effect, as long your gov rules under condition
    of war, because WWII has not been finished.
    What author mean is the federal Germany; it is a corporation like your gov.
    but not Germany!!! Sorry, but It is always and always and always the same mistake!

    Greetings from old Germany

  4. Trex says:

    Have you ever “lent” a “friend” money or items that never get returned? I think we have all had this experience at some time in life, from small to large scale. Of course, this ends the “friendship”, or even large international agreements, replaced by – what else – animosity. 20/20 hindsight right? The old rule still applies now as it ever has: possession is 99% of ownership. If you don’t put a date and time on getting things returned in short order, your “friends” simply have the mindset that you forever gave them these things – twisting reality in their favor. Seen entirely from the creditor being loaned, its never in their favor to dishonor their agreement as the long term favors end. So, their whole gains can be seen as short term and in full realization that this will end their trusting relationship. Who loses in the end? Of course both, but even greater so – the dishonest creditor. The lender has resources that they will never put towards the mistrusted creditor again. After “waking up” and realizing dishonest intentions, they’re also free to invest when and where they want, including in the creditor’s competition. Ouch! Here again the dishonest creditor loses big time. Bottom line: dishonesty is only good for a finite time period. When the lender wakes up, the game is over and the dishonest creditor loses everything they had – plus future potential. What goes around, comes around.

  5. Ilex says:

    More repatriation – Texas….
    http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/03/22/texas-moves-to-repatriate-its-gold-from-the-federal-reserve/
    Everybody wants their gold back and it’s just not there……….hmmmmmm

  6. Ilex says:

    Apparently Australia want to repatriate their gold as well. Seems to be a common theme.
    http://www.returnaussiegold.net.au/#!facts/coh8

    The kicker:
    “Could the Australian Government confiscate private gold holdings to rebuild gold reserves

    YES

    A little known Act of Parliament has been in place since 1959 to allow the Government to do this…”
    They don’t miss a beat do they?

  7. Ilex says:

    Here is more on the gold. See the comments? Oh my!!!!!
    http://www.ingoldwetrust.ch/bundesbank-changes-gold-repatriation-schedule

    • Jean says:

      Thanks for your several responses on this. I had no idea others were also asking for the return of their gold. . . The pressure is increasing . . . :) Hugs, ~JEan

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s