Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings

With the removal of the video from Dutchsinse’s site showing that websites were set up well in advance of these so-called killings, I think it is important to keep this story alive. ~J


By Nick Kollerstrom (with Jim Fetzer)
Source: Veterans Today

“No-one has been able to get into the Sandy Hook elementary school to verify if there are any bullet-marks, bloodstains etc, then on January 2nd, the children were transferred to another school some miles away: we assume the old Sandy Hook Elementary School will remain sealed off, and will be demolished. Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion.”–Nicholas Kollerstrom

Nicholas Kollerstrom is an historian of science who has taken great risks and suffered real harms by his willingness to conduct scientific research on the Holocaust. He has also done brilliant work on 9/11. The points that he makes here are rather chilling, including that the Batman film ‘Dark Knight Rises’ alluded to Sandy Hook region of Gotham City, as a portion of the city of Gotham during a setup of one of the bad guy’s dirty deeds in that movie.  Earlier promotions of the film the year before did not (Alex Jones discovered) have that Sandy Hook reference.  The 2000 film ‘The Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre’ has the killer strike in the aftermath of a hurricane.’ And the ritual sacrifice of 22 children is portrayed in ‘The Hunger Games’ by Suzanne Collins: she lives in Sandy Hook. As he observes, “Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion.”

Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings

by Nicholas Kollerstrom

The Predator has struck, one more time. We seek for its identity, what is it? I here compare two different events, perpetrated by the Enemies of Mankind, seven years apart.  Maybe first read my earlier post. 

1.   Scene of crime remains concealed: no media access

No-one has been able to get into the Sandy Hook elementary school to verify if there are any bullet-marks, bloodstains etc, then on January 2nd  the children were transferred to another school some miles away: we assume the old Sandy Hook Elementary School will remain sealed off, and will be demolished. Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion. Kids heard bangs, that’s all we can say.  The new school will be patrolled by security guards permanently: presumably to maintain the kids in a state of sufficient trauma to prevent them talking, or remembering the wrong sort of thing.

No bodies, only some duffle bags (Daily Mail)

The Mail Online 6 January shows this image, subtitled: ‘Chaotic scenes at the school as police work to secure the area and bodies are carried out of the school.’ But look carefully, no bodies are here, only some duffle bags – and some are doubting whether this is the school car-park.

In the London Bombings, the three train carriages were kept absolutely out or bounds then destroyed one year later: the blown-up bus was taken up to Sevenoaks Military establishment, i.e only the military can see it.

2.   CCTV switched off

The Sandy Hook Elementary School was in an up-market area of Connecticut, shown by the large majority of its children being from Jewish families. It would have had high-security equipment including CCTV cameras. We have as yet not been shown images from the time of the crime (curiously vague, but said to have been three minutes around 9.45 on 14th December). There are no images of a ‘crime scene’ eg bullet-marks in walls or through windows. No wounded persons being interviewed.

During the London Bombings, as also for 9/11, the CCTV was switched off: no pictures, from the most heavily CCTV’d city in the world (until 3 years later when some rather dodgy ones were released).

3.    The patsy perpetrator(s), clueless and unmotivated, are themselves killed so they cannot defend themselves. Dead, then can be given all the blame.

There is no reason to suppose that the 20-year old autistic Adam Lanza had any expertise or practice inusing guns, still less that his Mother went herself to a firing range or belonged to a rifle club and brought her son along. The car allegedly driven by him to the school turned out to belong to a shady felon, with FBI ties. Would or could any young man shoot his mother, take her car, drive it to a school to which he does not belong, be dressed in black, shoot his way into the school with several guns and kill virtually every target he aims at? How could anyone believe such a story? Then he kills himself – and then, goes over to his car and puts the rifle he has used back in the book. There is no conceivable motive for this physically quite impossible sequence of events.

The four alleged London bombers knew nothing about chemistry, never had any interest in it, and had no bomb-making skills that anyone ever heard about. Once dead they had no-one to defend their name against the official fictions. Not one of them had an animus against British society, to motivate any antisocial act.

4.   An ever-changing story

If a story is being made up, then different agencies will be spinning it, so it will never be very coherent. The Sandy Hook story became incoherent at the moment when CNN News announced that four pistols had been found in the school: presumably because the official coroner had averred that each of the 28 bodies had an average of seven bullet-holes in them, so they needed four pistols to credibly sound as if two hundred bullets had been fired. One young lad is not going tobreak into the school with four guns – after shooting his own Mother. .

The story of the rifle used – the Coroner averred that all injuries had been made with the rifle, then it was found to have been placed in the back of a car outside the school – can never make any sense.

First we were told she was a teacher at the school, and Adam went to that school, then later it emerged: A former school board official in Newtown called into question earlier reports that Nancy Lanza had been connected to Sandy Hook Elementary School, possibly as part of the teaching staff. “No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”

The 7/7 London bombings was truly an ever-changing story, with a narrative that relied heavily upon journalistic amnesia and credulity over the latest bit of unattributed gossip. Notably over what explosive had been used, which kept changing. The State lies to its own people. The State participates in killing its own people.

5. Terror-Drills being run

On 17th September 2010, HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program had a drill with FEMA at the Sandy Hook Fire Department, which is near to the Elementary School. On the day of the event, starting at 9.00 am, a FEMA exercise ‘Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters’ took place in Connecticut not far from Sandy Hook. Some conjecture that this got moved and happened at the school, which would account for the presence of Federal troops there seemingly much too early. There is probably a lot more of this to come out. There is a picture on the Web of children of Sandy Hook forming a chain and being told to close their eyes – that is what a kiddie terror-drill looks like – from a couple of months earlier.

“Sandy Hook has a recent history of federally staged Terror Drills. A mock school shooting drill was being conducted in Putman County only miles away on the very same day as the Sandy Hook events on December 14.”

Click Here to continue reading and to watch the video.

Related articles

Enhanced by Zemanta
This entry was posted in Financial/economic information, Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption, Political and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings

  1. Larry Cox says:

    Here again we have a close observer calling foul.
    One incorrect fact (Rodia) makes very little difference. All the other points seem to be valid, as far as we are able to assess the situation.
    If this conjecture is correct, this is truly pathetic.
    Yet perhaps we can learn from this. Perception plays such a massive role in the assumptions we make about “reality.” But if we are aware of the ways perception can be manipulated, we can check for these points as we observe our environment.

    If I were “them,” one of my interests would be to get the doubters to give up. And one way to accomplish this would be to present them with a totally fictitious incident (remember the movies that were made on this basis?) and sell it as totally real. Then when the doubters point to the various cracks in the story, you say, “prove we’re lying!” And the doubters can’t. All avenues of proof that would be acceptable to an honest person are blocked. Every single one. Can they really do this? If I were them, I’d certainly be interested in trying. If the attempt fails, you can always blame it on some “research project” or something.

    But OUR rule should be: Never give up. There is always a way to distinguish truth from fabrication. We will devote ourselves to becoming experts at doing this. The first step to this involves an infamous drill practiced by my church called “Observing the Obvious.” You are presented with a scene and asked to describe it. You are flunked for every detail you mention that is not totally obvious from observation alone. No “deductive reasoning” (ala Sherlock Holmes) is allowed. Just straight observation of what’s there.

    We can’t even do this yet with the Sandy Hook incident. We don’t even have photographs of any of the substantive elements of the incident. Not a single one!

  2. oldenwise says:

    I have been following this here for the last week on CNN facebook…

    • DrinkDeep says:

      does that go beyond 12/31? I don’t facebook, so maybe I’m not seeing it all – but doesn’t seem they’ve figured out Rodia wasn’t at the school

      on a similar topic, there was interesting news in the Holmes trial today – four gas masks??
      “The court also heard Wednesday about items found at the shooting scene.

      When officers searched Holmes’ car in the parking lot, they found “road stars” — the spikes thrown on the ground to stop vehicles. They also found a used tear gas can, a Glock with a holster, 2 cases for long guns, an iPhone and a carryall bag.

      Fyles testified that police they found four gas masks, although only two belonged to Holmes.”

      huh?? why would one person need two gas masks? and we’re supposed to think he found the used teargas canister in a dark theater, picked it up and put it in the car?

  3. susan says:

    Hi Jean, don’t know if this was posted yet or not….. Idahopicker of youtube has been pulling the pieces together as well:

  4. DrinkDeep says:

    I have a post stuck in ‘moderation’ over on the dutchsinse post, but this is a good source of info:
    The video linked to above in item 3 has been ‘removed by user’ (re: “The car allegedly driven by him to the school turned out to belong to a shady felon, with FBI ties”) – this explanation likely shows why – the person who posted the transcript was listening to more than one feed:

    Below is an email sent to Radioman911 from the operations commander of the Greenwich PD in which he claims that Radioman911 has included their 800 MHz signal along with the CT state signal and Newtown’s. He claims to recognize the officer’s voice on the recording as well as the dispatcher who replies to his inquiry. I post the email from Capt. Mark Kordick Ct. PD in it’s entirety as published with permission by Radioman911.

    Dear Sir:

    Your upload to YouTube relative to the Newtown CT Shooting radio traffic has caused quite a stir as it relates to a Mr. Christopher Rodia. I’m not sure where you sourced your feed, but the traffic related to Mr. Rodia is from a 800 MHz six-channel trunked LMR system in use in Greenwich, CT. Greenwich is approximately 45 miles away from Newtown. The Greenwich system carries only municipal Greenwich traffic (public safety and non-public safety) and is in no way connected to the state’s 800 MHz trunked system or Newtown’s.

    I am certain of this because after the matter (and all of the Internet Conspiracy Theory buzz – just google “Christopher Rodia”) was brought to our attention, we went back and checked our recordings for December 14. In addition to just recognizing the voices involved as Greenwich Police Officers and Dispatchers, we have all of the audio from our recording system that matches all of the “Rodia” traffic (and some of the other unrelated-to-Newtown casualty call traffic that occurs at the same time.)

    In any event, I’m sure you’ll want to help clarify this matter. The “Rodia” traffic is definitely contemporaneous – but from miles away. This has unfortunately additionally clouded an already confusing and emotional issue. Worse, it has brought considerable (and wholly undeserved) angst to Mr. Rodia. Anything you can do to help clear this up would certainly be appreciated.

    Feel free to message me back with any questions. I can also be contacted at

    Yours Truly,

    Capt. Mark Kordick
    Commander – Operations Division
    Greenwich Police Dept

    Furthermore with regard to the recordings themselves. A reader here linked me to a GLP article which erroneously states that Radioman911 was monitoring several feeds from towns including Greenwich (Radioman911 sourced audio feeds ONLY from State Police and Newtown) but that article does give a breakdown of what appears to be additional mentions of what appears to be a traffic stop prior to the 30:11 mark in the video which mentions Rodia. I decided to take the time to either confirm or reject these listed references in conjunction with the original posting of the recording at the 30:11 mark:

    “A man with the same voice who calls out the Rodia info says at 10:00:33 a.m. (25:02 in Youtube video) “33 to Headquarters, motor vehicle stop.”” CONFIRMED

    “He comes back on the radio at 10:01:12 a.m. (25:42 in Youtube video), in between shooting-related calls about getting “buses” aka ambulances, he (33) says “722-ZHA, radar,” meaning that the MV stop was by radar of a car with that plate.” CONFIRMED same voice

    At the 30:11 mark of the video in question, you can hear someone reading the license plate of the suspect’s vehicle: “872 YEO possible suspect vehicle“. CONFIRMED different voice

    At 10:06:13 a.m. (30:43) he’s back, “33 to headquarters. Run the operator. R..O..D..I..A , Christopher A. (scrambled) 26th, 69” CONFIRMED same voice

    It is understandable that given the information from the original source, Radioman911, many came to the conclusion that the plate that was read over the air as the suspect vehicle tracked back to Rodia. Radioman failed to inform viewers of his video that the recording included an area 50 miles from the scene which would not have been responding to the scene at Sandy Hook. That’s a key part of all of this.

    So it would appear that Rodia’s name was mistakenly identified with the license plate of the suspect vehicle. Again, this is based entirely on this recording which we already know is flawed as per the “official position”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s