I live in NYC. Was there on 9/11. I’ll go with Duff and VT Staff assessments.
Maybe some of the details are off, but the overall premise that Bush WH, Silverstein and Mossad – and NO Iraqis – DID IT still stands. Every Architect I know says the buildings had to have been bombed, nothing to do with the alleged airlines. If it was thermite nukes, star wars weaponry, missles, or all those together is not the real issue. The real issue is that the criminals are still running free.
Guiliani and Bloomberg, by lack of action to investigate furhther, are also complicit. Guilliani was doing “special drills” in an adjacent building that morning. When all the gold bullion was recovered, he immediately called off the search for survivors – firemen refused and rioted, Guilliani called in the cops to remove them. Bloomberg’s stint as mayor has removed all traces and tributes of the 9/11 attack.
Everything about the Bush alleged investigation (pages omitted) and theri explanations stinks.
Now Silverstein charges $24/person to visit his “Memorial.”
Victims families and most NYers are pissed.
I’d bet this attack article is some Israeli/Jewish shill, an epedemic on-line these days.
Btw: In a seminar, Ramtha once stated that due to 9/11 “…everyone (in NYC area) was contaminated…” He never explained with what. Duff and Company seems to fill in this info.
* * * * *
This question must be asked:
Why Mr. Gage, who boasts of having thousands of architects and engineers behind him and has a large advertising budget behind his operation, is so concerned about one person (i.e. Dr. Wood) who he purports has no value?
Also, why does Gage continue to misrepresent the information presented in Dr. Wood’s book?
* * * * *
Of all the hatchet jobs I have ever read this one has to be the most professional and egregious!
I purchased Dr. Judy Wood’s book back when it first came out and I read and reread it over and over. I am a mechanical engineer so I am somewhat familiar with what Dr. Wood was confronted with in her examination of the physical evidence both during the dustification of the New York Trade Center buildings and the debris pile remaining after the initial destruction had been accomplished.
In my reading of Dr. Wood’s book, I took particular note of her mention of engines being missing from vehicles while the hoods remained closed. And the missing door handles, and the damage to the front of the building across the street, which, when repaired, had to later be demolished because the original structure to which the repair materials had been attached continued to deteriorate – dustify.
The fact that Dr. Wood had no explanation for the missing engines, parts or door handles does not diminish her evaluation or expunge the evidence. She has made it quite clear in her book and during her interviews, that she refused to speculate as to the cause or the means by which these pieces of evidence came to be. All Dr. Wood did was state the facts, that these items were missing, gone, vanished. Dr. Wood acknowledged that she was not familiar with any technology capable of causing steel, other metals, and concrete to turn into dust. All she did was present the facts that all these various materials were missing (More on missing items below).
This hatchet job dismisses Dr. Wood mention of damaged vehicle roofs by asserting that the damage was caused by tiny particles of molten iron, from the cutting of the steel beams by explosives. Dr. Wood did not claim that there were no explosives used to cut the steel beams. She acknowledged that she had no way to know what means might have been employed to cause the destruction and dustification. However, the possibility that the tops of vehicles were damaged by particles of molten iron flying out of the Towers could not be more ridiculous. The particles described in this hatchet job were so tiny that if they were by some means spewed from wherever they were cut from by steel melting explosives, such particles would have solidified and cooled while they were flying through the air all the way to where ever the vehicles were parked. Cooled to the extent that they would only fall onto those cars as dust. That would not explain the actual damage.
Then there is the mention in this hatchet job of the stream of molten steel flowing from the building. Dr. Wood addressed this, explaining that as there was no source of heat sufficient to cause what appeared to be a flow of molten metal, it must not have been such a flow. Dr. Wood explained that we humans quite naturally describe what we see based on what we are familiar with, So if we see what looks like a flow of molten metal, that is how we will describe it, however, our presumption and description does not cause what we saw to be what we presumed it was.
Most people are not familiar with molecular dissociation. I am. I have personally caused molecular dissociation to create engine fuel, hydrogen gas, from H2O – water. Anybody can do this, it is actually quite simple. I assembled the necessary apparatus, connected it to a 12 volt DC car battery, inserted the apparatus in a plastic five gallon bucket containing common tap water, and watched “what appeared to be air bubbles rise to the surface, however, the bubbles were not air, they were hydrogen, When I held a flame to the surface of the water the bubbles popped, like pop-corn, as they reached the surface and exploded in the flame I held there. This is a form of molecular dissociation. The hydrogen molecules were disassociated from the oxygen molecules. Is it not amazing? Hydrogen is a burnable fuel; oxygen is required for fuel to burn. We know the pyramid, heat, fuel, oxygen. So when he heat water it should cause fire – right? Why does it not? We humans have no answer to that question, but when we separate the hydrogen from the oxygen, then we can use the oxygen to cause the hydrogen to burn hotter.
The point here is we need to understand that we do not know as much as we presume we do, about anything!
During one of her TV interviews Dr. Wood demonstrated an example of molecular disassociation enabled by a man who had been studying MD as a hobby. Dr. Wood placed a piece of iron 2″ square and 7″tall on a wood table top and had the MD beam directed at the iron block. The iron block just wilted down and bent over on the table and there was no heat generated.
As for Dr. Wood’s purported failure to explain how the MD caused the dustification or how much power it might take to effect such, she freely acknowledges she does not know, but her lack of knowledge does not alter the facts of the evidence.
It was not all that long ago that humans insisted the earth was flat and the sun moved around the earth, rising in the east and setting in the west. Today we laugh at the silliness of such beliefs. We need to understand that there are many things that we do not understand, that what we do not understand far exceeds what we do.
At the time the Trade Center buildings were being destroyed, several firemen then present spontaneously remarked that the building was turning into dust. There observation and conclusion seemed so totally preposterous that they were ridiculed by their team members.
And neither did the writer of this hatchet job mention the fact that during the purported removal of 220 stories of debris of two Towers, there were no dead bodies recovered – what happened to the 3,000 odd people were killed in those Towers? Were their bodies not dustified?
The hatchet job mentioned that there were many more steel beams than Dr. Wood mentioned in her book. What about the hundreds – thousands – of filing cabinets that were in those 220 stories of office space? Where did they go if they not dustified?
It was observed at the time, that there were literally millions of pieces of paper on the streets around the Twin Towers. Is it not reasonable that this paper had been contained in those thousands of missing filing cabinets? Where did the filing cabinets go – while leaving all the paper behind?
There had to be at least two rest rooms on every floor. With an estimate of two commodes each, that would be 4 x 220 = 880 commodes. Urinals, at 2 per floor would equal 440 urinals. Wash basins, at 4 per floor would be 880. What about the sheet metal of the commode stalls? Where were all the office desks? And chairs? Why was none, or very little of such debris included in the debris pile? Could it have been because it was all dustified? Why did this hatchet job not explain any of this?
Why did this hatchet job fail to explain why none of these items were in the debris pile? What about clothing, coats, umbrellas and such, that regular employees would have in their individual private lockers? What about the lockers? Would it not be expected that there would have been enough lockers in those towers so that every employee could have their own individual locker? How many thousands of lockers were not included in the debris pile? Could it be because they were all dustified?
As to how the dustification “beam” caused the damage to vehicles parked several blocks from the towers? How can any observer possibly know? Failure to explain this does not change the fact that it happened. However, using information that we are familiar with, such as spraying a high pressure stream of water at a pile of small pebbles, we know that those pebbles will fly every which way. If those pebbles were tiny magnets, such magnets flying through the air would be attracted to steel but not to plastic or aluminum. If the MD “beam” was not affected by aluminum but would molecularly dissociate steel, it might flow through an aluminum vehicle hood and dustify the steel engine. I am not asserting that this is what happened, only offering it as a possibility, applying knowledge that most of us are familiar with.
The burning question that comes to my mind, is why did this writer take such pains to discredit Dr. Wood? The reasonable explanation is that our wonderful government does not want us to know that it has such capability. How can it be reasonably possible that all the damage occurring at the Trade Center was not a False Flag operation of our government? Where was any airplane wreckage on the ground? It is totally impossible that the majority of the parts of such airplanes would not have fallen to the ground, together with most if not all of the passengers bodies. There is ZERO possibility that those purported airplanes penetrated those concrete and steel buildings to the extent that very little, if any wreckage fell to the ground – except of course, the passport or driver license of one of the rag-heads purporting to have flown the plane into the tower.
What we need to do here, instead of castigating Dr. Wood, is come to an awareness that our government is totally out of control, that voting is totally rigged, that if we do not come to understand that 911 events are intended to justify further control of the government over our lives, how much longer will men like me be able to write responses such as this?
* * * * *
E also says:
Thank you for posting my previous comment and for your supporting remark.
In my anxious desire not only to defend Dr. Judy Wood, but to expose the hatchet job attack on the reality of the molecular dissociation dustification of the buildings at the new York World Trade Center, I omitted “just a few things” that were missing from the piles of debris from that False Flag Attack on our Freedom, that were not addressed or accounted for or explained away by this hatchet job crew, which further serve to establish their hatchet job as a shill hoax.
I contend that the failure of these hatchet wielders to account for what I presented in my previous comment and additionally here in this addendum, exposes their fraudulent intent to eliminate any consideration of dustification (molecular disassociation), as having any possible application to the destruction of the World Trade Center. When an honest evaluation of the observable facts clearly indicates some manner of molecular disassociation was employed, how can their repeated denials be for any other purpose than to effect a coverup? Their repeated conclusive dismissals of DE-MD as having any possible application to the destruction of the WTC, serves to reveal themselves as shills, employed for the purpose of covering up the Truth. “Thou protesteth too much!”
I notice that this hatchet job was concocted by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, yes, as they wish it to be construed, being anything that points the guilt away from the government that issues them their licenses!
In my prior comment I neglected to mention the missing doors, there had to be hundreds and hundreds of doors installed in those 220 stories of office suites. “Where did all those doors go?” And carpeting, why was there no carpeting in the debris piles? What about microwave oven? And small office refrigerators? There had to be small kitchenettes in many of those offices, for the preparation of coffee and snacks. Where were the hundreds of coffee makers and thousands of coffee cups? Where were the small sinks that would have been in those office kitchenettes? Where were the thousands of feet of fresh water plumbing and sewer drain piping? And hot water heaters? And thousands of feet of electrical wiring? And thousands of electric light wall switches and electric wall outlets and their mounting boxes, and electrical fuse or circuit breaker boxes? Where were the thousands of telephones, computers, printers, fax machines and miscellaneous office supplies? Where were the elevators and related equipment?
There had to be at least one cafeteria in each Tower; where was any cafeteria equipment, stoves, ovens, more micro-wave ovens, refrigerators, freezers, cafeteria style eating tables or booths? Food supplies? Plates, cups, glasses, knives, forks, spoons, pots, pans? Where was all the ceiling tiles and sheet metal framing thereof? How about lighting, where were the thousands of overhead lighting fixtures? What better explains all of these missing items from the debris pile than molecular disassociation?
What about fire hose racks? Did not New York City Codes require fire hose racks throughout such buildings? What about the materials that would have comprised the emergency escape stair wells? These materials would have been severely damaged but would still be identifiable as to their purpose in the Towers. What better explanation for their absence can there be other than DE-MD?
If all of the filing cabinets I mention in my previous article had been removed from the building before the phony concocted airplane crashes, would it be reasonable that whomever removed them would dump out all of the millions of pieces of paper that everyone saw on the ground around the zapped buildings, before they removed the filing cabinets from the buildings? How could destruction limited to thermite explosives, possibly cause all those millions of pieces of paper to be discharged from those thousands of filing cabinets? However, if the filing cabinets were dustified, through some manner of molecular disassociation, that did not molecularly affect paper, would DE-MD not explain why all that paper was on the ground in that area and not still in the filing cabinets that would have been in the debris piles if those filing cabinets had not been molecularly dissociated? Does not the presence of all that paper on the ground stand as evidence that the filing cabinets were in the Towers before the False Flag Attack was initiated? Why did these hatchet job perpetrators not explain any of this?
How could very little of what I mention here fail to be in the debris piles? It is not at all reasonable that any significant quantity of any of these items would have been pulverized to the extent that they could not be recognized for what they had been, if such damaged items had been in the debris piles. What could be a reasonable explanation for the absence of all these items in the debris piles other than all of these items had been dustified through some means of molecular disassociation?
As an engineer, as a plausible explanation to why there were steel beams in the debris pile but none or very few of the items I list. The reason might well be because the thermite cutting explosives cut those particular beams out of the range of the DE-MD “stream” before the DE-MD “stream” had reached those beams. The steel beams were so heavy that they were able to crash themselves through to the ground, out of range of the DE-MD before the DE-MD was focused in the area where those beams had been installed. And, possibly, the reason why all of the items I mentioned were dustified was because they were of much lesser material volume, mostly comprised of thin material, possibly much more readily molecularly disassociated than the heavy steel beams.
Additionally, as this may very well have been the first time the DE-MD apparatus employed had been used in this manner, those deploying it were not sure as to how well it could be directed or focused, which applies to the missing vehicle engines and other damage outside the target area.
Additionally, I do not recall that Dr. Wood referred to whatever means had been used to dustify the Trade Center as being any manner of weapon. As I recall, in watching her interviews on TV or the internet, when ever a show host mentioned that the means of dustification was some manner of “weapon”, Dr, Wood, objected, stating that she was not making any such assertion, because she did not have information sufficient to determine what means had been used to dustify everything that had been dustified. All she was doing, Dr. Wood insisted, was presenting the evidence, which indicated that some means had been utilized to cause everything that was missing to have been dustified.
It is obvious that the dustification was effected by molecular disassociation that was by some means, directed at the WTC. “Directed Energy”, Yes! “Directed Energy Weapon”? Why?
For this hatchet job crew to repeatedly refer to the DE-MD means as a “Directed Energy Weapon” (DEW), indicates their purpose is to deny that which was not accused; thereby admitting it was. Why would a device utilized to efficiently remove unwanted buildings be characterized as a weapon? Why not simply as a device to more efficiently remove buildings that were known to include known carcinogens such as asbestos? Of course the answer to that is that DE-MD used as it was to bring down the twin Towers, would be expected to cause the human suffering that it did, therefore would never be approved. The means by which it was employed and the manner in which “our” government has used it to implement legislation such as the “Patriot Act”, does more to convince many of us that such was its intent, as an experiment enabling the government to determine how far it could go in its overt implementation of its police state control of the population of this country. With Obama now claiming he has authority to determine, on his own authority, to have any citizen of this country killed, for writing such as I am here in this comment.
As a final point, the “Powers That Be” want us to believe that the Towers were destroyed by fire. What does fire burn first? PAPER!
Because I am somewhat familiar with molecular disassociation, I have taken the liberty of referring to the dustification at the Trade as being molecular dissociation. That is my characterization, not Dr. Wood’s,