UPDATED: ~Jean’s response to Emily Twomey’s very long post. I’ve stayed up very late in order to get this most unpleasant task out of the way. . . September 11, 2014

UPDATED: I will not be accepting any comments on this post! After three hours of sleep, I awoke to the angry realization that Emily Twomey has totally lost her compass and has no morality or integrity as a researcher — or as a person. Zero!!! Because I’d been traumatized by Neil Keenan in the past and realized it was happening again, until I could find a place of safe-keeping for these records (now accomplished) and before they might disappear somehow from the internet, I sent her the records I had for safe keeping. Instead, she chose to make them public on the internet. These were personal expressions that never should have seen the light of day, not only from Michael Calhoun but from me, if only for our personal safety. Neil has been threatening to kill me in a very public manner!!! So much for Emily Twomey!!!

I worked laboriously for several hours, near sick to my stomach at what I had to deal with, only to awaken with the realization that I need not have said any more than this!

*  *  *  *  *  *  * 

I have taken Emily’s post just exactly as she put it out there, and I have tried to answer it point by point to the best of my ability. (Yes, I feel like I’m in a court of law.) Emily’s research was impeccable, but she apparently did not like it when I agreed with her that we should no longer work together. It had gotten to the point where I felt I couldn’t breathe without Emily’s saying it was okay, and I didn’t like that feeling. When she started editing my comments, telling me to change them, I began to feel very uncomfortable. I am not a perfectionist, and she evidently is in an excrutiatingly painful way. Perfect or not, they have always been and will continue to be my comments. I prefer to make my own decisions, right or wrong. 

Apparently she has decided to take great offense at my decision not to work with her anymore, even though I thanked her for her efforts – she did work I could never have done, had no desire to do. She seems to have decided to become the one person who is arbiter of the ‘truth’. I  think it is a mistake for anyone to think it is their job in life to do that.

Comments by Emily that I have chosen to address — there were so very many that I could not address them all, I have put in boldface. My responses to them are in my usual style.

Her problems with me seem to hinge around three areas: 1) the Bitcoin Accounts and my handling of them. 2) Michael Calhoun being criminally involved with Neil Keenan. Please be sure to scroll down to the bottom of this long, long detailed comment to the items in red, where I seriously questions Emily’s motivations for doing this. 3) My inability to believe Neil was deeply implicated in all of this is, of course, why this went on so long, until she proved it to me beyond a doubt with the fact that Count Albert is involved in the same sort of schemes that Silva/Aidun are.

Please note, however, that I am still reading more ugly untruths about me, ~Jean, now being added to by Emily with her comments under the following articles — at AmericanNationalMilitia,com – A comment from a follower : Let Down & Fed Up;

— http://our-manmade-disasters.blogspot.ca/2014/09/when-caught-lying-keenan-always-claim.html,

— and people are now telling me she is even leaving them on Neil’s site. . . Yet, Neil Keenan has not once addressed the legal questions that were asked of him. Please note, however, that we are no longer hearing anything more about Silva/Aidun/the no-fly zone.

What kind of ethics are being displayed here by Emily Twomey? She, who was so upset that I dared to post (as comments only) articles from this site: http://our-manmade-disasters.blogspot.ca because on a second or third level she found that they may well be connected with OITC!  My blog is not about perfection. It is about getting info out there, and the info they are publishing about Neil Keenan and the Keenan Team seems accurate enough. Whether or not you agree with me, the fact that they are investigating is quite enough. I have absolutely no desire to do so and want only to move on.

What kind of ethics is Emily Twomey displaying when she freely posts personal information about Micheal Calhoun that clearly was never meant to see the light of day? I have referenced this is red. She decides without any ‘real’ proof that he is aligned with the criminal elements working with Neil. While these red items appear throughout the entire post, after a very, very long scroll down almost at the end of her diatribe, those that I consider to be totally immoral are posted. I didn’t choose to put them out there. Instead, I actually chose not to, but I will defend myself against such ugliness, for whatever reason. 

Emily is also now stating that she did the research. I was, however, never, ever against publishing her name, except that I thought it might come back to haunt her, especially when Neil began threatening my life to the effect that: “I could make one call and have her rubbed out.” Not very nice.

Posted by Emily A. Twomey at 04:17

Wednesday, 10 September 2014

Jean Haines and the fraudulent Global Accounts BITCOIN Affair – How Haines assisted Michael Calhoun in transferring over $5,000 to Neil Keenan.

How Haines assisted Michael Calhoun in transferring over $5,000 to Neil Keenan.

In this post you will find:

  1. A reply posted by Haines’ in response to my attempt to post a comment refuting her allegations on the post she published about me
  2. My reply to Haines’ comment
  3. The entire email conversation between Haines and me regarding the above mentioned Bitcoin transaction.
  1.  A reply posted by Haines’ in response to my attempt to post a comment refuting her allegations
  1. Jean says:

September 6, 2014 at 4:55 pm

Well, here is the guilty party! Leaving a comment! I will not comment on Emily’s words, because there is very likely to be legal redress required, and at that time I will not speak.

By legal redress I meant that I am, very likely to have to go to court to get my savings back from Neil Keenan.

What I will say is that Emily sought to control everything I did and said, and when I said NO, she turned on me. . . I may have made mistakes, but I also have records of every single word that has passed between everyone concerned, so let it all come out, but in the proper place. . . Emily, why don’t you tell your group of people in Cork, the Peace Activist group, how you have harassed me. . . ? ? ? If they come to me, I will be happy to share the facts with them. . .

Your perception of the video supplied to you by XXXX at first stunned me. That you could consider the behaviour of the man in the house in that video to be an example of how you believe is the way forward for the future is indeed of great concern.  That you think this is acceptable behaviour shows me a side of your character that I had previously not seen as I had being viewing you as a victim in the whole Neil Keenan affair.  Those policemen had just been told by a woman that she had been seriously beaten up by a felon and they had been told that this felon had run into the house on which door they were then knocking on.  The man, before he answered the door, knew why the police were there as he told the police he had seen the whole incident of the woman being beaten up, yet he pretended as if the police were knocking on his door for no reason.  That is not normal behaviour, if someone called to my door under such circumstances, I would feel it was my civic duty to assist the police on behalf of the poor woman that has been beaten up, particularly if, as the man clearly said he had, I had seen the whole incident. [Obviously, Emily appears to be completely unaware of how United States citizens are being treated by the police, which have become quite militarized, and that it is no longer in our interests to open the door to them without a warrant. The exit and entry to the home could easily have been controlled by the police, while a warrant was obtained.

This same video was later to appear on RT: RT: VIDEO: Man refuses to let cops search house without warrant, records everything despite police protests, and you will notice my comment there on the post: 

To those who know something about common law, I think I am stating clearly what I see happened here. Because this man refused to show his license, he did not buy into the legal system and become the strawman, and these policemen did not dare force entry. As far as I can see, there was no reason for them not to guard that home, while they got a warrant. I invite comments on this . . . 🙂 Hugs, ~Jean

Am I not entitled to say this? Are my readers wrong if they agree with me?]

If you had been the woman that was beaten up would you not have liked the man to be more helpful to the police and perhaps to have assisted them in finding this convicted felo who had just beaten you up.   The man was aggressive from the minute he opened the door.  I don’t know if you ever had an LED light shone in your face but it is not a pleasant experience, the man shone such a light in to policemen’s eyes as soon as he opened the door and blinded them and of course they reacted the way the did.. They were following information from a woman who had just been beaten up by a convicted felon and she had told them he had gone into that house.  This man was rude, ignorant, unhelpful to the police who in this particular instance were trying to help a woman who had been harmed.  At the very least his behaviour wasted their the policemen’s time and at the very worst he even could possibly have been the felon himself but even he wasn’t the felon, his ignorant behaviour certainly allowed the felon more time to get away.  For all you know the next time that felon could come back and kill that woman he had just beaten up.  It made me realise very clearly that you do not understand the real meaning of sovereignty reclaimation and that you do not understand how this concept is being misused to aid and abet criminals in their criminal activiites.  There are people who I work with who are indeed experts in this field and that is why that is one of the reasons the whole incidence of this sovereignty scam has been so abhorrent to me.  These sovereignty scams are seriously underming the efforts of real sovereignty campaigners in their attempt to change the way our legal system is run.  True campaigners know that the only way to really change the system for betterment of humanity is to use clear, accountable, and peaceful methods to achieve a system which truly benefits all humankind and not just a select few.

Your lack of common sense and emotional intelligence in reading this video for what it actually is gave me quite a jolt.  It made me realise that I indeed may have been very wrong in my perception of you.  [In the next sentence, Emily correctly states the name of the organization which I cited incorrectly. Not a big issue to me. ~J] In light of the seriousness of this I raised this issue last night at a meeting of the peace commission here in Cork of which I am a long time member.   As the commission committee has in its regular fold several well known Irish peace activist lawyers and psychiatrists I thought it was an ideal opportunity to get a handle on what has actually been going on here. At the meeting I filled them in on all that has been happening as I now realise that I may I have been very wrong to support you in the way I did.   My colleagues rightly pointed out that I have no idea of your true nature and that perhaps you are far from being an innocent victim in all this   The fact that you and those members of your web community that have commented on the video demonstrate no empathy or concern for the plight of the woman who was beaten up in this video raised serious red flags among committee members and raises serious questions about your true nature.  My colleagues considered that even if you may not have been aware that the Global Accounts is a scam that is being perpetrated on an innocent public, your blind allegiance and blatant promotion of a ’cause’ that you had not indeed researched raises serious ethical and legal questions in relation to your negligence and lack of due diligence.  Your website promoted and assisted criminals in exhorting money from well meaning people and even after you knew that these people were indeed criminals, rather than insisting that the money was returned to the people who had given the money in good faith and who trusted your judgement on the matter, you actively (against my advice) participated in the transfer of the money to these criminals.   The point was also raised that over a period of two years, you actively assisted this criminal organisation in promoting and pursuing their criminal activities even to the point of assisting them in procuring the release from jail of one their rightly convicted colleagues.  [I do not know the veracity of this statement, or how Emily can put this out there as being a true statement. Where has she gotten her information? We have been told that Nelu came out of this with a heart condition, having left his family – a young son,  for two years. I tend to think Nelu was used and was simply collateral damage, but I do not know it for a fact. I think very few people actually know the truth in all of this. Neil never actually got Nelu out; his prison time was up, and he was released. I leave you to decide if  this is good research?]   This behaviour viewed in the cold light of day appears to be far from the innocent activities of a duped old lady particularly when you are now appearing to be so keen to promote the activities of a known fruadulent organisation, the OITC.

[Emily discovered a possible second or third level link to OITC, through the postings at this blog: ttp://our-manmade-disasters.blogspot.com/2014/09/indonesian-dr-seno-edy-soekantos-cease.html. Even though I never picked up their stories and published them as articles, she became adamant that I remove all their comments, which at first I did. By then, however, I was getting tired of this control of my blog’s activities by Emily, and so I reposted them. My reasoning was that if what they were posting was true, that did not necessarily mean that if they were OITC, I was supporting them. At the very least, they seemed to be getting the ‘real’ story of Neil’s activities out. Emily seems to have forgotten that this IS my blog, and I am responsible for what I publish.

Emily continues . . . and Your initial reluctance to allow me to investigate the possible criminal activities of Neil Keenan until you had become aware that he had cut you completely from the fold is also questionable. [Again, this statement is made without proof — cut me completely out of the fold? ? ? Why, would I ever want to be in that particular ‘fold’? Instead, I simply could not believe that Neil is what he now appears to be. ~J] The commission is currently deciding whether this whole affair warrants further investigation.

I, personally, am very disappointed in you and in your lack of decency and accountability in this whole matter.  At this crisis point in world history, it is truly sad that there are people out there that are indeed more interested in promoting their own interests and egos under the guise of aiding humanity and its awakening.  I did not think you were one of them, but your childish reactions to the truth, your unwillingness to face reality in the face of all common sense and valid proof and your track record of blind allegiance to corrupt causes has unfortunately made me suspect that this indeed may be the case.

Emily fails to say that these that follow are my own statements:

To the people on my blog, I apologize that it has come to this, but I will not step back from such sickness . . . How would you be feeling if you’d just lost your [life] savings? I do not believe – and still don’t believe – that the person who made the decisions on those BITCOIN funds was dishonest. I have that Skype conversation, unedited, that Neil’s RESEARCHER tried to publish as edited. I think he may well have lost as much or more than I. I also know that at that point in time, he hadn’t begun to figure it out. Now, he just may be part of these very dark people, but I think not . . only time will tell on that one. The fact is, though, that Emily seems to have decided  . . . all without proof!

Emily started in on me when I published the RT video about the man who would not let the cops in his door, telling me I was a threat to the sovereign movement, didn’t know what I was talking about, etc., etc., etc. I began to realize then that something was going seriously wrong with her ability to think clearly – if, indeed, she is as sophisticated about these things as she says she is. At any rate, my mistakes will forever remain my mistakes, and I was happy to let Emily go as soon as I realized she might do darned good research, but she is deeply into lack of trust and desire to Control others. . .

Hugs,

~Jean

Reply

  1. 2.  My reply to Haines’ comment

“I will not comment on Emily’s words, because there is very likely to be legal redress required, and at that time I will not speak.”  –

[I’ve already address this statement above but obviously Emily fails to recognize a typo. Very professional of her. ~J]

Bear with me while I try to get my head around that sentence.. It is a tad convoluted. Firstly, Haines decides she is not going to comment on my words and then she rants on for another while about what I said.  Secondly, when there is a legal redress, she isn’t going to speak.. strange woman indeed.. still if it stops her whinging for a bit, bring it on. [Why this cruelty? Again, is this professional? Or just plain mean-spirited ?~J]

I would be delighted if Haines would please post all the emails so everyone can see that I never treated her with anything other than kindness and respect (and believe me that was no easy task considering some of her condescending emails that I used to get in return).

ps. Jean, could you do me a favour and print them all.  I deleted one or two by accident and I would love to see them again.. cheers. 

[No, Emily, I will not print them all. There were probably 100+ a day 🙂 ~J]

As for the ‘Peace Activist’ group, there is no such entity (not known by that name anyway) – again, Haines is unable to get her facts right.

I see Haines is also accusing me of ‘sickness’. Now, if I was really ‘sick’ that wouldn’t be a very kind and humane way to treat me would it?

About the Bitcoin account: I advised Haines many times to cease contact with all the Keenan Team, prior to the date she assisted her Bitcoin business partner, Michael Calhoun of the Neil Keenan Team in transferring over $5,000 of fraudulently obtained funds from the global accounts Bitcoin account to Neil Keenan.  Prior to that date Haines had published three articles I had written on her blog which clearly pointed out that members of the Keenan Team had been engaged in fraudulent activities. Despite my warnings, Haines continually persisted in contacting various members of the Keenan Team including Count Albert, Michael Calhoun – her global accounts Bitcoin business partner and others. [This is blatantly untrue. Emily needs to provide proof. I notified Count Albert as part of the KeenanTeam when I was done with them. Period. Michael and I have never spoken since we transferred the accounts.

Also, Emily’s basis for saying that Michael is criminally involved with the Keenan Team apparently is based on this statement alone at the end of the email that Michael:[6:43:12 AM] Michael Calhoun: She pretty much says she doesn’t know what the fuck..]

I know Michael, or at least I thought I knew him. We worked together well and many times, although we had problems now and then. He was delighted to be helping Neil, or so he said. – see below ~J]

Haines was hoping she could persuade them to get Keenan to see sense and to come back [This is blatantly untrue. Emily needs to provide such proof. She makes some very serous assumptions. ~J] to her and to apologise, and all could go back to the way it was, playing pretend global accounts games and pretending to the world that she was a sophisticated business woman who was acclaimed for her special inside knowledge of the (fake) global accounts.

The emails below tell the story of how the $5000 was transferred from the fraudulent global accounts Bitcoin account to Neil Keenan’s account.  While at first it may look as if Haines was clueless in all this, it is important to remember that I had warned her many times not to trust Calhoun. [Not so. Many times? I think that is a stretch. She needs to prove this fact.  I’m not going to try to count, because no matter what Emily might try to say, we are not in Court here. What was the proof, however, other than that which she states, and I also told her rather strongly that I didn’t agree with her ~J]  Haines couldn’t wait to get rid of the responsibility of the funds and to pass it on to someone else.  She never once contemplated returning it to the rightful owners ie. the donors. When she received an email from a donor requesting a refund on his donation, instead of being open and honest about it all and asking for advice from an official source about the Bitcoin account, Haines chose to sign it away as quickly as possible to Keenan to avoid any repercussions on herself. [Well, Emily, it seems I certainly failed in that effort, wouldn’t you say? Although, I do not yet know whether or not Michael Calhoun is an honest man. Do you? People may yet see their money returned. ~J] Haines did not give a thought to the people who had donated the money to the global accounts ’cause’ in good faith, She did not care one iota about them or consider that they were entitled to get their money back and she is still of the same mind on that subject it would seem. In fact, in all of the very substantial number of email conversations between us, Haines never once mentions the people who donated money or how they must be feeling or how she could make it right for them. She never mentions her blog readers, or seem to care whether this would disappoint them or not.  In fact, when I said to her at one stage that she was giving out very confusing messages to her readers in her replies to her comments as one minute she was telling them all to back off Keenan and the next minute she hated him and then the next minute she was making excuses for him again, she replied that this wasn’t about her readers, this was about her.

It was always all about Haines, how she was feeling, what she needed, how she had to get Keenan to see sense and come back to her, how she had to be the one to win. Her selfish and thoughtless actions enabled Keenan and Calhoun to steal money (‘theft by deception’ is the legal term for it just like what the fake ‘king’ Silva of the Keenan Team was previously convicted for) which belonged to well-meaning people and as Haines was the one who had lobbied her blog readers and the public to donate this money iin the first place, and because she had the power to hold the funds in the account until clarity could be gained on the situation, she shares responsibility for this theft.  Haines has studiously avoided addressing this issue to date. [I’m sorry, but I can’t begin to address this twisted statement. It is so much like what is on Drake’s AmericannationalMilitia site. I can’t straighten out this devious mindset . Forgive me. I give up on it. ~J]

In her comment above, Haines asks me how would I feel if I had just lost my savings. Haines did not lose her savings, she herself signed them over to Calhoun and Keenan along with all the savings of the donors who she had cajoled over the years into handing over money to a fraudulent enterprise so that she could impress Keenan and show him how valuable she could be to him.  [Emily’s research is very poor here. Neil promised to return my savings – plus more, and I have this in writing. I never signed them over to Calhoun. She is once again making assumptions. As a researcher, she needs to give proof of her statements. I am not on the defensive here. ~J] Again, it is all about Haines losing her savings, she does not even mention, never mind show any empathy or feeling for, the other donors whose money she carelessly tossed away in her effort to avoid responsibilty and to pass to buck the Keenan. Instead of taking responsibility for her actions, Haines, again, plays the helpless victim. Her helpless facade crumbles, however, with her pronouncement “I will not step back from such sickness”. There is nothing helpless about the viciousness she is displaying towards me in her ruthless and unjustified attempt to quiet my voice.  However, unfortunately for Haines, the transcripts below tell the real story. That Haines still believes that Michael Calhoun is well-intentioned after what is detailed in the scripts below is well beyond belief. [I address this elsewhere in red. ~J]

As to the RT youtube – I have already discussed that in my reply to Jean Haines – and I state clearly here again, Haines has no knowledge, idea or clue about Common Law, other than what she has picked up from comments people send into her pages.  She has never researched the subject, or  studied it, other than to read a few scraps of unvalidated articles and watched a few suspect youtubes.

My thanks to Haines for stating that I do some ‘darned good research’.  That is a big step up from what she said about my research just after she published the first three articles, which I researched and wrote, under her own name – As the second last email printed on this post shows, she only considered it ‘basic’ research then. [Emily clearly has ego issues; to get all hyper about something like this is beyond the pale and very unprofessional. I also thanked her for her help, and said I agree we should not work together anymore, and look what has happened. What in the world is going on here? ~J] Odd really, considering at the time she was calling my research ‘basic’ she was simultaneously responding graciously on her comments pages and elsewhere to all the accolades she was were receiving for having ‘researched’ and ‘written’ such articles.[Not surprisingly, Emily neglects to state that we had several conversations about my putting her name out publicly , and we agreed not to do so.  ~J]

As for the Control comment – Now that’s just funny!  Which I think will be obvious to anyone who reads the email conversations below.

  1.  The entire email conversation between Haines and me regarding the above mentioned Bitcoin transaction

THE BITCOIN AFFAIR AND THE GLOBAL ACCOUNTS FRAUD

Below see the sequence of email correspondence between Haines and me relating to the fraudulent transfer of over $5,000 dollars from the Bitcoin account of Jean Haines and Michael Calhoun to Neil Keenan.

[I think you can basically skip this first skype exchange although it is there for the historical record. It is part of the comment on my site that I chose not to publish, because it clearly came from someone on Neil’s team, who claimed she had ‘researched’ it.  This was a lie; she had to get it directly from Neil. It was then apparent to me he had no concern at all over the privacy of Michael Calhoun. He threw him out . . . coldly and harshly.

The second exchange  is not edited, and it is this one on which I choose now to comment.

Both exchanges are between Michael and me,  but the first one was edited by Michael and sent to Neil.

~J]

Beginning with an email sent to me from Haines about a comment she wanted help with moderating on the Busted King Silva and the Neil Keenan Team post – Note: Haines started this conversation during the night. I woke up to a string of emails and a very panicked sounding Haines.. It took me a while to register what she had done during the night. The emails were sent in quick succession and sometimes two conversations overlap.

Emily tells us she knows nothing about Bitcoin, and then, however,  she jumps once again to making assumptions about what actually happened in the Bitcoin Account. It doesn’t take much more than someone who can read a checkbook to understand it. It seemed pretty clear to me what had just happened — and from there her mind travels mysteriously to the fact that I am erratic and unpredictable. ? ? ? J]

As I am not familiar with how Bitcoin works, I didn’t catch until later that the transaction that was carried out was the transfer of the $5,000 from Haines and Calhoun’s Bitcoin Account to Keenan. Note also that I clearly asked Haines to tell me what she had actually done and what transaction had just taken place but she didn’t answer me on that one. It was only later when I had a chance to look back through the conversations that I realised what had happened. I think it is clear from these conversations why I state in my reply to Jean Haines “At that stage, I was glad to walk away as Haine’s behaviour was appearing to be erratic and unpredictable.”  Note, also, that at this time I was operating under the illusion that Haines was a sweet elderly lady that had been conned by some nasty men. After the last email in the sequence, I had decided that enough was enough as I explain in my reply to Jean Haines, but subsequently, Keenan published a nasty video about Haines and I contacted her because I knew she would be upset. See rest of that story in my reply to Jean Haines.

Beginning with an email sent to me from Haines about a comment she wanted help with moderating on the Busted ‘king; Silva and the Neil Keenan Team post ..

———————————————————————————————-

Okay, it looks like Neil is throwing Michael to the dogs, as well. . . dirty, dirty, dirty . . . It’s been selectively edited . . . and I can post more of it than is there. . .‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 4:02:51 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)
Hugs? No, Not from you Jean.My comment to your “Busted” post was not meant to present evidence to refute what you wrote. Not at all. I do not need to come up with any new documentation for you to contest. The character and past history of Edmund K. Silva, Jr., as well as the Kingdom of Hawai’i restoration plans, are in plain view on this website: I have read everything on that website.To assume that I have not done any research is a grave error on your part. That is what I do, and have done for every book that I’ve ever written. Yes, I am an author, Jean. I am also a college graduate – Magna Cum Laude – from Texas A & M University. I do know how to do research, and I am not naive in my thinking whatsoever.

Now your assumption that I haven’t questioned Mr. Silva’s conviction is also erroneous. Yes, I have. As a researcher, and because of being a Hawaiian resident for 10 years, I have been able to “talk story” with (interview) many people who sincerely believe in, and respect Edmund K. Silva, Jr., for who he is.

So, the question begs to be asked … how do we know he wasn’t exonerated? How do we know that there were not extraneous circumstances that led to his conviction? These are possibilities that a professional researcher or journalist should answer before they go to print with a blog post such as yours.

I do not believe that Hawai’i is your business (nor is it mine). The people of Hawai’i have struggled long and hard for a chance to regain their sovereignty. Do you really know about the plight of the Hawaiian people – today? Do you know what it would be like to hold a dream for over 100 years to see their Kingdom restored? I certainly cannot fathom this; yet I believe, as thousands do, that the chance for the Hawaiian Kingdom to be restored rests in Edmund K. Silva, Jr.

I believe the right thing to do, Jean, is to remove all of the posts about the Kingdom of Hawai’i and King Edmund K. Silva, Jr. from your blog, and allow the Hawaiian people to follow their own conscience. They do not need your help.

Jean, you equate the light with truth. I agree.

Yet, you’ve taken it upon yourself to judge someone whom you do not know, as though you know the truth about him.

It is my opinion that you are the hypocrite, liar and fraud, Jean. [Please note, these are pretty strong, ugly statements from a mere ‘researcher, although, granted a magna cum laude from Texas A & M. The question is, Why? ~J]

As a researcher, and as someone who has developed many contacts in the alternative news community over the last several years, I have uncovered a transcript that shines a light on your character. Look it over, and see what is revealed. This Bitcoin situation with Neil is certainly a big deal, and there are many people who would question your integrity once they read this.

[8/24/2014 3:36:37 PM] Michael Calhoun: Thanks. I went through the Skype records of jean. She has always had sole control of the Bitcoin account. There was one transfer to Jo to the bank of china. Jo has access to the numbers for that transfer. That was, of course completed by jean because she has exclusive control over the Bitcoin account which we set up on her PC. I haven’t received a balance statement in months
[3:44:02 AM] Neil Keenan: Call to Michael Calhoun, no answer.
[3:44:24 AM] Neil Keenan: The [xxxxxxx] used your name
[3:44:49 AM] Neil Keenan: says you are the administrator not her
[3:45:00 AM] Neil Keenan: son of a bitch this ass has to be stopped now
[3:45:04 AM] *** Call ended ***
[5:03:51 AM] Michael Calhoun:? Is she saying I have the Bitcoins? Do you want me to call her?
[5:51:13 AM] Michael Calhoun: I think she is just confused. Her posting the account pictures shows her access to the account. She is the only one with access. It’s on her desktop alone. I don’t have access.
[5:51:23 AM] Michael Calhoun: I want to call her
[6:00:52 AM] Michael Calhoun: I called her. She didn’t pick up. I texted her. I told her she’s confused . She’s the only one with access to the Bitcoin account. It’s on her desktop. I never had the access numbers and never wanted them for this very reason
[6:42:34 AM] Michael Calhoun: ok, buddy. This is my conversation with [xxxxx]:
[6:42:36 AM] Michael Calhoun: [10:54:57 PM] Michael Calhoun: Hi jean. I tried to call u. Please leave my name out of your blog. You’re misinformed about my access to the Bitcoin account. I have none. The account is on your desktop. That’s how you can access and post pictures of it. I cannot access it and never have. I walked you through the transfer to Jo which you did from your desktop. I cannot be the administrator. You’re the only one with access.
[10:57:52 PM] Michael Calhoun: Please do not mention my name on your blog again. I thought u promised not to make my name public. That’s why I have not been public. I’m not and never have sought publicity. And I’m not working with Neil at this time for my financial requirements.
[11:00:23 PM | Edited 11:02:23 PM] Jean Haines: Yes, you walked me through everything. I never knew how to do it. Neil takes no prisoners and now he’s decided he’s going to destroy me, and you took great delight in trying to roll me just like Neil . . . remembers? Maybe you should have thought of this before you, too, tried to screw me. The decisions were yours. I was the techie . . .
[11:02:36 PM] Jean Haines: I have nothing more to say . . .
[11:02:37 PM] Michael Calhoun: I don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. You are the ONLY one with access to that Bitcoin account. I never had access. Never wanted access.
[11:03:00 PM] Michael Calhoun: Keep my name out of your blog
[11:05:07 PM] Michael Calhoun: It’s on your desktop. That’s why u can open the account and post pictures. That’s why you shared balances. I don’t and never had access,
[11:05:46 PM] Michael Calhoun: Understand?
[11:07:01 PM] Jean Haines: Yes, and I couldn’t make a payment if I tried. Remember how you walked me through everything? Michael, please don’t skype me anymore. I’ve had it with the whole bunch of you people . . . I gave it my best . . .
[11:07:07 PM] Michael Calhoun: Go back and look at our Skype about it. You’re wrong. I don’t administer it. You have exclusive access. Stop posting your shit with my name
[11:07:46 PM | Edited 11:09:42 PM] Jean Haines: Sorry, Michael, you made the decisions. You told me what to do and how to do it . . . I was the techie. .
[11:09:58 PM] Michael Calhoun: You’re not a techie. You are the sole account holder. That is a fact. Don’t posts that I’m the administrator of an account I never have access to. You have sole access. That’s not a character attack. It is the historical fact
[11:11:16 PM] Michael Calhoun: If you’re confused. Ok but you are telling lies about me intentionally or not. Take my name off. Pull your head out. Ask someone who can tell you that you’re the only one with access.
[11:12:34 PM] Michael Calhoun: Read our skypes. That’s the way we set it up. I did not want responsibility of the funds. Take my name down immediately. And do a retraction without my name.
[11:13:08 PM] Michael Calhoun: Your posting account pictures proves you have the access
[11:13:38 PM] Michael Calhoun: You used to post them to me because I don’t have access!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[11:14:32 PM] Jean Haines: Tell your boss, Neil, to stop telling lies about me. I do have access, but I can prove you walked me through everything. I don’t have a clue how to do it. I have everything on record! Tapes, emails, messages . . . so get off my back, Michael, and talk to your boss.
[11:15:34 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m not working with Neil. You’ve lied about me, unintentionally, I believe that. Take my name down.
[11:16:07 PM] Jean Haines: No, I’m not taking it down. Tell Neil to back off!!!
[11:16:31 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m sure you’re clueless. You’re also the sole account holder. I think you see that now.
[11:17:48 PM] Michael Calhoun: You said that I’m the administrator of the account. But now you see that you are the only account holder and have sole access. That’s becoming intentional slander
[11:18:15 PM] Jean Haines: I have proof of what I say . . . have you read what he had to say about me? Did you listen to the Drake show? I’m on my own, Michael, and I’m not going down. . . I will present everything; make everything public . . . everything . . . so get used to the idea. . .
Neil was your boss at the time, and you were delighted to strong arm me. I’m taking care of myself, Michael. Where were you back then when a little decency was required?
[11:21:10 PM] Michael Calhoun: I don’t follow drakes show. I’m working in dc full time. You need to retract what you now know is untrue. I’m not the administrator of that Bitcoin account. You have exclusive access. So take down that misinformed untruth and leave me off your blog. I haven’t done a damn thing to you.
[11:21:32 PM] Jean Haines: Oh, no?
[11:21:48 PM] Michael Calhoun: Don’t be a liar. Take it off
[11:24:13 PM] Jean Haines: Michael, I suggest you acquaint yourself with what is going on with Neil . . . before you speak with me again. . . I will simply block you . . . I”m in no mind to put up with this. Yes, I did what you told me to do . . . is that the ‘real’ administrator? I don’t think so . . . You made the decision, what to do, when to do it, how to do it . . . and I did it for you as a favor . . .
Now, I’m being treated like dirt by the whole bunch of them . . . and I’m not going to take responsibility, because I can’t really explain anything about it, or how it was done . . .
[11:26:47 PM] Michael Calhoun: You have until tomorrow morning to take your lies down or face the consequences of libel. I cannot be an administrator of a Bitcoin account I never had access to and you have exclusive access to. You are committing knowing slander on your “truth” site. Take you lies down. That’s your last warning
[11:27:03 PM] Jean Haines: Speak to Neil!
[11:27:20 PM] Michael Calhoun: No
[11:27:27 PM] Jean Haines: Ge the ‘real’ picture . . .
[11:27:45 PM] Michael Calhoun: You’re going to get a real lawsuit
[11:28:13 PM] Jean Haines: Okay, go right ahead . . . along with Neil’s I’ll be in real trouble. .
[11:28:48 PM] Michael Calhoun: You’re being a fraud
[11:29:11 PM] Michael Calhoun: See u in court. I’m taking off my Skype contacts
[11:29:14 PM] Jean Haines: I suggest you take the time to inform yourself of what is really going on . .
[11:29:22 PM] Michael Calhoun: [xxxxx]
[11:29:31 PM] Michael Calhoun: Liar
[11:29:36 PM] Jean Haines: Great, Michael, just great!
[11:30:46 PM] Jean Haines: let me say what is going on with Neil is pretty darned big, and you’d better start to pay attention. . .
[6:43:12 AM] Michael Calhoun: She pretty much says she doesn’t know what the fuck..

* I replaced some some of the unsavory comments with [xxxxxx].

——————————————————————-

Note from emily – btw the woman who wrote this silly comment is obviously very silly herself because  she made a very big mistake for which I am very grateful – she messed up on the cut and paste and included the last line by accident which has been very telling as you will read later on – [6:43:12 AM] Michael Calhoun: She pretty much says she doesn’t know what the fuck..
[Emily apparently uses the above statement to condemn Michael. How dare she!!! One statement, and he is in her eyes publicly condemned.]

Haines’ next email shows us what was edited out of the email above. [Emily refers to the email that Michael sent to Neil. He edited it. I did not.  The next skype exchange was the actual exchange between Michael and me. ~J]

ps. We know the fake king wasn’t exonerated because I checked it out. You should check out KPs site – Apparently there is a documentary on RT “Hawai’i: The Stolen Paradise” which is ‘very unveiling about many things Hawai’i’ and it unveils the fact that the people of Hawaii don’t actually want a ‘fake’ king, perhaps try Brigadoon – I hear there’s a vacancy for one there.

———————————————————————————————————-

My entire conversation concerning the bit coin account with Michael . . . The other skyped ‘comment came from Neil . . . and it showed no regard, either for Micahael’s privacy. What a shit he is!‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

[I’ve highlighted the statements that show 1) at the time, Michael apparently knew nothing of what was going on with Neil/Drake, Aidun and company, because 2) he was now working a full time job in D.C. to provide for his family. I happen to believe this was true, but now I realize there was a lot I did not know, so maybe he wasn’t telling me the truth.

The fact is, though, that Emily used the one statement above to publicly convict Michael of working with criminals. I think this was very, very wrong! Is this the mark of a good researcher, or of one who researched to fit a preconceived agenda? ~J]

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) .
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 4:20:10 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com

[8/24/14, 7:55:42 PM] Michael Calhoun: Hi jean. I tried to call u. Please leave my name out of your blog. You’re misinformed about my access to the Bitcoin account. I have none. The account is on your desktop. That’s how you can access and post pictures of it. I cannot access it and never have. I walked you through the transfer to Jo which you did from your desktop. I cannot bethe administrator. You’re the only one with access.

[8/24/14, 7:58:37 PM] Michael Calhoun: Please do not mention my name on your blog again. I thought u promised not to make my name public. That’s why I have not been public. I’m not and never have sought publicity. And I’m not working with Neil at this time for my financial requirements.

[8/24/14, 8:01:07 PM] Jean Haines: Yes, you walked me through everything. I never knew how to do it. Neil takes no prisoners and now he’s decided he’s going to destroy me, and you took great delight in trying to roll me just like Neil . . . remember? maybe you should have thought of this before you, too, tried to screw me. The decisions were yours. I was the techie . . .

[8/24/14, 8:03:21 PM] Jean Haines: I have nothing more to say . . .

[8/24/14, 8:03:22 PM] Michael Calhoun: I don’t know what the fuck your talking about. You are the ONLY one with access to that Bitcoin account. I never had access. Never wanted access.

[8/24/14, 8:03:44 PM] Michael Calhoun: Keep my name out of your blog

[8/24/14, 8:05:52 PM] Michael Calhoun: It’s on your desktop. That’s why u can open the account and post pictures. That’s why you shared balances. I don’t and never had access,

[8/24/14, 8:06:31 PM] Michael Calhoun: Understand?

[8/24/14, 8:07:45 PM] Jean Haines: Yes, and I couldn’t make a payment if I tried. Remember how you walked me thorugh everything?

Michael, please don’t skype me anymore. I’ve had it with the whole bunch of you people . . . I gave it my best . . .

[8/24/14, 8:07:51 PM] Michael Calhoun: Go back and look at our Skype about it. You’re wrong. I don’t administer it. You have exclusive access. Stop posting your shit with my name

[8/24/14, 8:08:31 PM] Jean Haines: Sorry, Michael, you made the decisions. You told me what to do and how to do it . . . I was the techie . .

[8/24/14, 8:08:37 PM] Michael Calhoun: Call started

[8/24/14, 8:08:37 PM] Jean Haines: Call ended – busy

[8/24/14, 8:10:42 PM] Michael Calhoun: Your not a techie. You are the sole account holder. That is a fact. Don’t post that I’m the administrator of an account I never had access to. You have sole access. That’s not a charachter attack. It is the historical fact

[8/24/14, 8:12:01 PM] Michael Calhoun: If you’re confused. Ok but you are telling lies about me intentionally or not. Take my name off. Pull your head out. Ask someone who can tell you that your the only one with access.

[8/24/14, 8:13:19 PM] Michael Calhoun: Read our skypes. That’s the way we set it up. I did not want responsibility of the funds. Take my name down immediately. And do a retraction without my name.

[8/24/14, 8:13:53 PM] Michael Calhoun: Your posting account pictures proves you have the access

[8/24/14, 8:14:23 PM] Michael Calhoun: You used to post them to me because I don’t have access!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[8/24/14, 8:15:17 PM] Jean Haines: Tell your boss, Neil, to stop telling lies about me. I do have access, but I can prove you walked me through everything. I don’t have a clue how to do it. I have everything on record! Tapes, emails, messages . . . so get off my back, Michael, and talk to your boss.

[8/24/14, 8:16:18 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m not working with Neil. You’ve lied about me, unintentionally, I believe that. Take my name down.

[8/24/14, 8:16:51 PM] Jean Haines: No, I’m not taking it down. Tell Neil to back off!!!

[8/24/14, 8:17:15 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m sure your clueless. Your also the sole account holder. I think you see that now.

[8/24/14, 8:18:33 PM] Michael Calhoun: You said that I’m the administrator of the account. But now you see that you are the only account holder and have sole access. That’s becoming intentional slander

[8/24/14, 8:19:00 PM] Jean Haines: I have proof of what I say . . . have you read what he had to say about me? Did you listen to the Drake show? I’m on my own, Michael, and I’m not going down. . . I will present everything, make everythign public . . . everything . . . so get used to the idea. . .

Neil was your boss at the time, and you were delighted to strong arm me. I’m taking care of myself, Michael. Where were you back then when a little decency was required?

[8/24/14, 8:21:55 PM] Michael Calhoun: I don’t follow drakes show. I’m working in dc full time. You need to retract what you now know is untrue. I’m not the administrator of that Bitcoin account. You have exclusive access. So take down that misinformed untruth and leave me off your blog. I haven’t done a damn thing to you.

[8/24/14, 8:22:17 PM] Jean Haines: Oh, no?

[8/24/14, 8:22:32 PM] Michael Calhoun: Don’t be a liar. Take it off

[8/24/14, 8:24:58 PM] Jean Haines: Michael, I suggest you acquaint yourself with what is going on with Neil . . . before you speak with me again. . . I will simply block you . . . I”m in no mind to put up with this. Yes, I did what you told me to do. . . is that the ‘real’ administrator? I don’t think so . . . You made the decision, what to do, when to do it, how to do it . . . and I did it for you as a favor . . .

Now, I’m being treated like dirt by the whole bunch of them . . . and I’m not going to take responsibility, because I can’t really explain anything about it, or how it was done . . .

[8/24/14, 8:27:32 PM] Michael Calhoun: You have until tomorrow morning to take your lies down or face the consequences of libel. I cannot be an administrator of a Bitcoin account I never had access to and you have exclusive access to. You are committing knowing slander on your “truth” site. Take you lies down. That’s your last warning

[8/24/14, 8:27:48 PM] Jean Haines: Speak to Neil!

[8/24/14, 8:28:05 PM] Michael Calhoun: No

[8/24/14, 8:28:12 PM] Jean Haines: Ge the ‘real’ picture . . .

[8/24/14, 8:28:29 PM] Michael Calhoun: Your going to get a real lawsuit

[8/24/14, 8:28:58 PM] Jean Haines: Okay, go right ahead . . . along with Neil’s I’ll be in real trouble . .

[8/24/14, 8:29:33 PM] Michael Calhoun: You’re being a fraud

[8/24/14, 8:29:56 PM] Michael Calhoun: See u in court. I’m taking off my Skype contacts

[8/24/14, 8:29:59 PM] Jean Haines: I suggest you take the time to inform yourself of what is really going on . . .

[8/24/14, 8:30:07 PM] Michael Calhoun: Fuck off

[8/24/14, 8:30:16 PM] Michael Calhoun: Liar

[8/24/14, 8:30:21 PM] Jean Haines: Great, Michael, just great!

[8/24/14, 8:31:31 PM] Jean Haines: let me say what is going on with Neil is pretty darned big, and you’d better start to pay attention. . .

[8/24/14, 9:51:12 PM] Michael Calhoun: I did not mean to block you. I’m on my iPhone and I was trying to call u

[8/24/14, 9:52:47 PM] Michael Calhoun: Look, jean. I have never done anything to hurt you. I don’t know what u think I’ve done to you. You can’t pin everything Neil does on me.

[8/24/14, 9:54:14 PM] Michael Calhoun: I promised my wife that I would stay behind the scenes with this. U know that. I’m not in this for publicity. I just wanted to do something positive to make a difference

[8/24/14, 9:54:44 PM] Michael Calhoun: I stayed clear of the melo drama between you and neil

[8/24/14, 9:56:41 PM] Michael Calhoun: Of course I stay in touch and support Neil’s efforts, but I’m working full time in DC and haven’t been working in Neil’s stuff for months. My wife list her job and I’ve been scrambling for months to keep afliat

[8/24/14, 9:57:25 PM] Michael Calhoun: Afloat. I don’t want u to be mad at me. I thought we left things on a good note

[8/24/14, 9:57:43 PM] Michael Calhoun: I want to keep it there

[8/24/14, 9:58:16 PM] Michael Calhoun: U there?

[8/24/14, 10:00:33 PM] Michael Calhoun: Please consider removing my name from your blog. I don’t want that kind of exposure. U know that about me. You put my name out there to fight with Neil. That’s not fair to me or my family

[8/24/14, 10:01:22 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m not suing over this horseshit. Just do the right thing and keep me out of it.

[8/24/14, 10:05:12 PM] Jean Haines: I’m in bed. This has been terrible for me, michzel. He’s spparently involved himself with some con artists. I gave him a heads up, and he got ugly ugly. He is now on the defensive, because I took the time to do some tough research. You really need to listen to drakes last show. It was terrible, and no one believes him but the rabble. Then look at his last posts, all attacking me. then look at my most recent post about him . . . Terrible, terrible. . .

Just now, some one emailed me that they want their $100 back. I don’t have a clue how to do it – and I’m the administrator? That’s nuts!

[8/24/14, 10:24:25 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m sorry. I don’t want the bad blood

[8/24/14, 10:26:15 PM] Michael Calhoun: I just got off Skype with Neil. He wants to transfer the Bitcoin to so I will administer it from my desktop. You can send inquiries about it to me and I’ll handle them

[8/24/14, 10:27:00 PM] Jean Haines: Let me say I think I know why he did what he did, but I told him back on July 29 that the perfect situation would fall in place at just the right time. He would never listen to me, ever, but guess what – nit 48 hours later it fell in place. Do you think I’m going to even try to tell him? Can I trust him with other peoples lives? If it suits him, he lies. He isn’t honest.

[At this point in time, I still did not realize that Neil himself was implicated in the Aidun/Silva scheme. I was thinking he was trying to establish an International Court to try the criminals, something I thought the military had told him was a prerequisite to opening the Accounts. ~J]

He lied about the conversation he swore he didn’t have with Gregory about a new blog, when all. He had to do was say he made a mistake! People make mistakes all the time! He lied about the white hat in d.c. Wanting Neil’s post moved up the. Way Roberts was. It was Neil who wanted that done, and ge was being little-boy jealous. I can’t work with someone like that! I need to be able to trust him, and I just can’t. He let all those lies about me stand publicly! He is the leader, and he sets the tone. What kind of a leader is he then.

Michael, I’m not sure Neil will open those accounts, and it breaks my heart, he’s going to do it his way, and nobody is going to stand in his way.

I told him about drake , but he wouldn’t listen. I’m demonized by him – for having the guts to stand up to him and tell him the truth!!!

[8/24/14, 10:27:09 PM] Michael Calhoun: The $750 we transferred to joe is still sitting in their bank of china account

[8/24/14, 10:29:15 PM] Jean Haines: Let me try to get some sleep. That was up to Neil, and he did nothing about it. You see? He’s a mess. . .

[8/24/14, 10:29:17 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m beat, jean. I just heard about u dropping my name on your blog tonight. I’m going to bed. We’ll talk tomorrow.

[8/24/14, 10:30:17 PM] Michael Calhoun: Will I please think about taking my name down? I promised my wife my name wouldn’t be out there with all the foul play surrounding neil

[8/24/14, 10:30:52 PM] Michael Calhoun: It’s not right to do that to me and my family. I have two small boys, rember

[8/24/14, 10:31:33 PM] Jean Haines: Yes,

[8/24/14, 10:31:59 PM] Jean Haines: I’m delighted to be out of the whole thing.

[8/24/14, 10:32:26 PM] Jean Haines: Take it over. I haven’t a clue what to do

[8/24/14, 10:32:45 PM] Jean Haines: Tomorrow.

[8/24/14, 10:34:36 PM] Jean Haines: I feel sick to my stomach at what I had to do. It wasn’t easy fir me. I gave him my best, and he threw me away. I kept wondering what I was doing that was so wrong.

[8/24/14, 10:36:50 PM] Jean Haines: I think I just honestly wanted to help, butvthatcwasnt what he wanted. He wanted yes-men, and thats what he’s got.

[8/25/14, 3:19:10 AM] Jean Haines: It’s the middle of the night for me, but I got up and removed your name. I will send you the email . . .

[8/25/14, 6:32:16 AM] Michael Calhoun: my email address is . . . .

[8/25/14, 6:32:23 AM] Michael Calhoun: the kolab email is not working.

[8/25/14, 6:32:46 AM] Michael Calhoun: I want to send a small test amount

[8/25/14, 6:33:25 AM] Michael Calhoun: lets do .0001 bitcoin which is about five cents

[8/25/14, 6:33:39 AM] Michael Calhoun: I’ve set up this bitcoin account number:

[8/25/14, 6:33:42 AM] Michael Calhoun: XXXXXXXXXXX

[8/25/14, 6:34:24 AM] Michael Calhoun: thanks for removing my name.

[8/25/14, 6:34:27 AM] Michael Calhoun: from the blog

[8/25/14, 6:34:34 AM] Jean Haines: Michael, I’m sorry, but I’m not even dressed and my dogs need walking. I also need food. I have forwarded you the email under the proper address . . . 🙂

[8/25/14, 6:34:45 AM] Jean Haines: Later 🙂

[8/25/14, 6:34:58 AM] Michael Calhoun: ok. but I don’t have that old email address. ttyl

[8/25/14, 6:49:57 AM] Michael Calhoun: please just sent a test .0001 bitcoin transfer to this address:

[8/25/14, 6:50:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: On 8/25/14, at 6:32 AM, Michael Calhoun wrote:

XXXXXXXXXX

[8/25/14, 6:50:23 AM] Michael Calhoun: when i confirm that it went through ok, we can transfer the balance. Thanks.

[8/25/14, 6:52:34 AM] Jean Haines: I sent you the email to the address you gave me this morning. . .

I don’t know how to do this. We are going to have to talk – but later – so you can talk me through how to do it . . .

[8/25/14, 6:52:53 AM] Jean Haines: Now, I’ve got to get off here for the moment. . .

[8/25/14, 7:06:09 AM] Michael Calhoun: ok

[8/25/14, 8:02:52 AM] Michael Calhoun: Let me know when it is a good time for u.

[8/25/14, 8:16:46 AM] Jean Haines: Michael, I’m just back and have fed my dogs. Now comes me. I will get back to you ASAP. I promise.

[8/25/14, 9:04:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: K

[8/25/14, 10:14:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: R we close?

[8/25/14, 10:24:47 AM] Jean Haines: Yes, let’s do it now. . . I’m just back from an errand I had to do . . .

[8/25/14, 10:24:55 AM] Jean Haines: call me . . .

[8/25/14, 10:26:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: I have to go down the hall. Give me 5 min. Peter skyped me that article and I too could not get to it. It was a blank white page

[8/25/14, 10:26:19 AM] Jean Haines: It’s now on my blog 😉

[8/25/14, 10:29:35 AM] Michael Calhoun: Call started

[8/25/14, 10:31:10 AM] Michael Calhoun: XXXXXXXXXX

[8/25/14, 10:31:16 AM] Michael Calhoun: .0001

[8/25/14, 10:38:30 AM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 10.37.38 AM.png

[8/25/14, 10:40:41 AM] Jean Haines: Call ended 11 minutes 6 seconds

[8/25/14, 11:10:32 AM] Michael Calhoun: do you have a confirmation? I don’t

[8/25/14, 11:12:09 AM] Jean Haines: Nope. I just closed out – in case – and reopened . . . and nothing has changed. . .

[8/25/14, 11:12:37 AM] Jean Haines: oops. just now I got the picture of a clock in the status window . . .

[8/25/14, 11:12:37 AM] Michael Calhoun: The account number is cutt off. can you open the transaction window and send me that?

[8/25/14, 11:13:02 AM] Michael Calhoun: well, that’s progress. I don’t remember it taking time. Oh well.

[8/25/14, 11:13:24 AM] Michael Calhoun: Let’s just wait for the status to finish up.

[8/25/14, 11:13:45 AM] Jean Haines: Yes, I think so . . . it is what it is . . .

[8/25/14, 11:54:31 AM] Michael Calhoun: It went through. Send the spendable balance to the exact same address. The balance after that we can send over once its available

[8/25/14, 11:54:47 AM] Michael Calhoun: Do you want me to go online with you?

[8/25/14, 12:20:33 PM] Michael Calhoun: you there?

[8/25/14, 12:26:37 PM] Jean Haines: Okay, I will try . . . and if I get in trouble, I will have to call you . . .

[8/25/14, 12:26:50 PM] Michael Calhoun: thanks.

[8/25/14, 12:27:01 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’ll be here.

[8/25/14, 12:27:50 PM] Jean Haines: Okay, I’m not getting a spendable balance ? ? ?

[8/25/14, 12:28:14 PM] Jean Haines: That showed up when I sent the initial sum this morning . . . I think . . .

[8/25/14, 12:29:19 PM] Jean Haines: Shall I try to send the entire balance and hope it will key me into what is possible?

[8/25/14, 12:29:25 PM] Jean Haines: That is easily done. . .

[8/25/14, 12:30:35 PM] Michael Calhoun: yes

[8/25/14, 12:31:18 PM] Michael Calhoun: would you please skype me another screen shot when completed so I can confirm the numbers while its processing. Thanks, Jean.

[8/25/14, 12:32:08 PM] Jean Haines: Sure, if it works 🙂

[8/25/14, 12:34:22 PM] Jean Haines: It didn’t work. This is the message . . .

[8/25/14, 12:34:31 PM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 12.33.54 PM.png

[8/25/14, 12:35:08 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’ll take a look.

[8/25/14, 12:38:54 PM] Jean Haines: I don’t have time to do the possible additon to figure it out . . . sorry . . . could you use my photos? That’s why I put them out there . . . so everybody could see . . .

[8/25/14, 12:39:21 PM] Michael Calhoun: try sending 8.9. I think we need to leave enough to pay for the transaction

[8/25/14, 12:40:51 PM] Jean Haines: I just thought how to do it . . . the first screen shot shows the ‘spendable amount. . . I will input that and try it . . . I couldn’t think how to access it 🙂 but we’ll see. I think it likely will work . . .

[8/25/14, 12:41:23 PM] Michael Calhoun: I think we just did not allow for transaction fees

[8/25/14, 12:41:55 PM] Jean Haines: I don’t know, but I will try the ‘spendable amount’ and let you know . . .

[8/25/14, 12:42:00 PM] Michael Calhoun: ok

[8/25/14, 12:43:29 PM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 12.42.42 PM.png

[8/25/14, 12:43:34 PM] Jean Haines: it went

[8/25/14, 12:44:04 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’ll figure out the fees for the final send.

[8/25/14, 12:44:31 PM] Michael Calhoun: apparently you can’t send everything, there is no funds for transaction fees, which are tiny

[8/25/14, 12:45:04 PM] Jean Haines: I”m not sure what you are saying . . . it went, didn’t it?

[8/25/14, 12:45:53 PM] Michael Calhoun: yes. it did not go through the first time becuase we sent everything, and there was not a small amount to pay for the transaction. it’s like a fraction of a cent, but it is something.

[8/25/14, 12:46:10 PM] Jean Haines: Here is the photo of the transaction. . .

[8/25/14, 12:46:17 PM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 12.45.39 PM.png

[8/25/14, 12:46:43 PM] Michael Calhoun: we have to do this one more time for the balance.

[8/25/14, 12:46:48 PM] Michael Calhoun: less transfer fee.

[8/25/14, 12:49:10 PM] Michael Calhoun: the transaction fee is apparently .0001

[8/25/14, 12:49:24 PM] Jean Haines: Check the photo. It only says balance . . . nothing about ‘spendable.’ I think you likely have to open another account . . .and I need to close this one. . .

[8/25/14, 12:49:28 PM] Michael Calhoun: you can probably send 1.569 now.

[8/25/14, 12:49:37 PM] Michael Calhoun: that leaves .0001 for the fee

[8/25/14, 12:49:44 PM] Jean Haines: No, I don’t think so, but I will try . . .

[8/25/14, 12:51:40 PM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 12.50.59 PM.png

[8/25/14, 12:51:45 PM] Jean Haines: You were right . . . It’s all yours 🙂

[8/25/14, 12:51:55 PM] Michael Calhoun: thanks, jean.

[8/25/14, 12:52:00 PM] Jean Haines: Welcome 🙂

[8/25/14, 12:52:15 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m going to read Peter’s piece finally, now.

[8/25/14, 12:52:50 PM] Jean Haines: I haven’t even had a chance to breathe, let alone bathe . . . what can I say 🙂

[8/25/14, 12:52:57 PM] Jean Haines: Enjoy it 🙂

[8/25/14, 12:59:38 PM] Jean Haines: Michael I will automatically further any future requests to you . . . . 🙂

[8/25/14, 12:59:53 PM] Michael Calhoun: thanks

[8/25/14, 1:00:10 PM] Michael Calhoun: please don’t share that email. I’ll set up another non-business email for this.

[8/25/14, 1:00:13 PM] Michael Calhoun: and get it to you.

[8/25/14, 1:07:31 PM] Jean Haines: I wouldn’t share anything with anyone. . . I forwarded it to you . . . is that what you mean by ‘sharing’?

[8/25/14, 1:07:48 PM] Jean Haines: This is business, Michael, and should remain totally private . . .

[8/25/14, 1:08:24 PM] Michael Calhoun: I meant my . . . . . eamil. I’ll get another one. the kolab turned into requiring paypal. and i wasn’t interested in that. ill get a gmail for these sorts of things. take care, jean.

[8/25/14, 1:08:38 PM] Michael Calhoun: we’re good, right?

[8/25/14, 1:08:45 PM] Jean Haines: Michael, there isn’t anyone with whom I would share it . . .

[8/25/14, 1:09:11 PM] Jean Haines: As long as you play fair with me, we’re good . . .

[8/25/14, 1:09:37 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m not playing at all. I’m working full time and just trying to keep food on the table and a roof over our heads.

[8/25/14, 1:09:59 PM] Michael Calhoun: and try to support those who are fighting the good fight.

[8/25/14, 1:10:01 PM] Jean Haines: I don’t share business. . . not a good idea . . .that is this woman’s personal business, too — remember that

[8/25/14, 1:10:11 PM] Michael Calhoun: ok. caio for now.

[8/25/14, 1:10:20 PM] Jean Haines: Yes, I understand . . . it’s the same for me, you know . . .

[8/25/14, 1:10:23 PM] Jean Haines: ciao

[8/25/14, 1:10:49 PM] Jean Haines: Believe it or not, I suspect the Universe knows exactly what it is doing and that this will turn out just fine . . . 🙂

[8/25/14, 1:11:16 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m down with that.

[8/25/14, 1:11:22 PM] Michael Calhoun: 😉

[8/25/14, 1:12:10 PM] Jean Haines: It’s what helps me. . . I’ve learned to trust that as long as I do what I feel called to do, as long as I stay in a positive flow and stay centered and calm . . . everything is going according to a plan . . . and only now am I beginning to see the end plan . . .

Still, a lot is required of us. . .

[8/25/14, 1:12:27 PM] Jean Haines: . . . and believe me, it hasn’t been easy . . .

[8/25/14, 1:13:01 PM] Jean Haines: I should have said the endgame . . . 🙂

Okay, it’s 1:12 here, and I’m finally going to try to get a bath 🙂

[8/25/14, 1:13:11 PM] Jean Haines: Bye for now 😉

[8/25/14, 1:13:12 PM] Michael Calhoun: have a good one.

[8/25/14, 1:13:25 PM] Jean Haines: It helps me to relax . .

[8/26/14, 6:11:23 AM] Michael Calhoun: Nelu is free and with Neil !

[8/26/14, 6:14:55 AM] Jean Haines: Yes, thank you, I read this. I remember two years ago when he was arrested. How different things are now. How sad! I wish him the best.

The comment on my blog. . .‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

 

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 4:22:56 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

. . . I’ve blocked this person from my blog, who obviously works for Neil or Naidu . . .

Neil seems to have no regard for Michael’s privacy . . . I cannot find this anywhere on Neil’s blog . . . so Neil had to give it to this person, who calls herself a ‘researcher’. . . not much research required I should think. . .

I’ve also shared it with Michael, and asked him if he is aware of what Neil has done . . .

I’d like to post the ‘real’ conversation to Neil’s blog . . . and of course they wouldn’t post it . . .

Neil is nuts, and he’s going down . . .

Michael’s comment . . . and a couple thoughts from me . . .‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

 

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 4:43:28 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

Michael’s comment tonight about this: I got authority to accept the coins from Niel and copied him on my conversation for that expressed purpose. U think he shared that with a 3rd party?

I mean Emily, what do you think? Michael was speaking with Neil . . . who else had that info . . .

Michael has to go to work tomorrow and it is after midnight there. He asked if he could call me tomorrow . . .

I think I need to let this go out, say it hasn’t appeared anywhere else on the web that I know of, that Neil had to be at the bottom of this . . . and that the article was edited . . .

It was that stupid woman whose post you also thought was ridiculous . . . why does Neil have such idiots working for him?

So much darkness right now . . . that must mean Neil is in big trouble . . .

I’m off to bed . . .

Hugs,

!Jena

 

He has a video up‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

 

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:59:50 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

… Of Nelu. Notice who. Nelu fails to thank in the video. Aidun and me.

Neil is obsessed with this. It’s terribly sick, and so is he.

I think we get an article out ASAP and let the chips fall where they may.

He’s counting in mr not doing it, but I sure don’t want him opening those accounts. I’m feeling horrible, sick, and probably won’t sleep. [I’d now pretty much decided that Neil is deeply involved in the scam. ~J]

It makes me feel like when my husband threatened me during our divorce and I had to get a restrung order. I stopped it dead in its tracks before it could escalate.

~J

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

 

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:06:15 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

My heart won’t stop pounding. I feel like I could be sick. Please, help me get this done 🙂

I want it over. . .

[Yes, I surely did want it over, and I do want it over, but not until it’s thoroughly over! 

Yesterday, Drake published more ugly words about me on his AmericanNationalMilitia.com site, and they are all twisted truths and lies. Now, Emily is posting there, as well, and on http://our-manmade-disasters.blogspot.com/2014/09/when-caught-lying-keenan-always-claim, and I understand now even on Neil’s site. ~J ]

——————————————————————-

Stopping Neil dead in his tracks. . .‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:08:10 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

Sent from my iPad

>

> Emily, Neil is going to escalate this gradually and just torture me.

>

> I think I need to stop it now. What I’m thinking is to write something and get it ready to publish, revealing the pornography. Then we send it to the Dragon Family, expressing our concern for the accounts, but saying that unless this stops we will publish it.

>

> Or…

>

> We can simply up lish it and let the chips fall where they may. I realize there was another comment left yesterday that came from Neil. I will get it from the trash tomorrow and send it to you.

>

> If you don’t nip this in the bud, it is guaranteed to get very ugly,

>

> Hugs, ~Jean

>

> Sent from my iPad

jean… i was asleep… i am awake now and i will look into it‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: Jean Haines

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 7:53:53 AM
To: Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

stay calm.. i will look into it…

—————

Stay very calm.. it is very important … now.. to think carefully and not to react emotionally‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: jhaines6@me.com

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 8:14:35 AM
To: jhaines6@me.com (jhaines6@me.com)

do not write anything relating to neil and the nelu situation for the moment.. until i check everything out.. do not answer neils video and his omission of your name in helping nelu… if i am right in what i think about neil that this was a con since 2011/2012  then nelu could also be involved .. his omission of your name in this instance is then a good thing.. i am not saying right now that nelu is guilty but there is a chance he could be.. [Emily certainly has changed her tune on this one. ~J] you could have been conned into helping him.. remember how they made a hero out of silva because they said he had been jailed because he was the true king.. well this could be a very similar situation..

fact:  nelu didn’t get out because of neil.. he got up because his parole came up.. as far as i can ascertain.. i must check it out more…

for now … do not write anything in response to neil… or anyone relating to this  matter.. answer the non-aggressive and supportive comments but do so very vaguely… either just publish them.. or do the mother theresa thing.. smiles, hugs, etc. but nothing about neil for now… dont publish or try to answer any aggressive or attacking comments just now send them to me…

if you dont put anything out there.. they can’t get at you.

[This sort of help was great – up to a point. As you can see, I did not understand it was not without strings . . . ~J]

 

———————————————————————–

My entire conversation concerning the bit coin account with Michael . . . The other skyped ‘comment came from Neil . . . and it showed no regard, either for Micahael’s privacy. What a shit he is!‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

 

To: Jean Haines

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:15:36 AM
To: Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

okay jean, now i have seen the rest of the skype I am totally confused.. if  Michael was being so aggressive to you at the beginning and you said you were going to bar him from your skype.. why did this following conversation then take place 

[Yes, Emily, why did it take place? Could it be that Michael is truly innocent?

Please scroll a good distance down, friends, and make sure you read the last skype exchange that is in red between Michael and me, which demonstrates clearly to me that Michael still did not understand what was going on. I’d just recently been through this stage, and I feel I understood what was going on, but maybe I am wrong, because we have never heard from Michael, himself.

Also, Emily feels no professional compunction as a researcher at revealing all this private information between Michael and me, which I think is totally immoral. If she wants to investigate Neil Keenan, let her do it – and God help him, because she won’t let go. But why does she freely release information about Michael and his personal family situation? 

The question I’m also asking now is why is Emily Twomey trying to run me into the ground?  What is going on in her mind? I’m sorry, but I must leave it up to you to decide if this is normal behavior. If I was wrong/am wrong, isn’t that my concern? I thanked Emily for her work, and I thought we agreed we’d done our job and that it was time to move on. Emily doesn’t seem to agree, even when there are far more fertile grounds for research out there.  ~J]

[8/25/14, 3:19:10 AM] Jean Haines: It’s the middle of the night for me, but I got up and removed your name. I will send you the email . . .

> [8/25/14, 6:32:16 AM] Michael Calhoun: my email address is . . . .

> [8/25/14, 6:32:23 AM] Michael Calhoun: the kolab email is not working.

> [8/25/14, 6:32:46 AM] Michael Calhoun: I want to send a small test amount

> [8/25/14, 6:33:25 AM] Michael Calhoun: lets do .0001 bitcoin which is about five cents

> [8/25/14, 6:33:39 AM] Michael Calhoun: I’ve set up this bitcoin account number:

> [8/25/14, 6:33:42 AM] Michael Calhoun: XXXXXXXXXXX

> [8/25/14, 6:34:24 AM] Michael Calhoun: thanks for removing my name.

> [8/25/14, 6:34:27 AM] Michael Calhoun: from the blog

> [8/25/14, 6:34:34 AM] Jean Haines: Michael, I’m sorry, but I’m not even dressed and my dogs need walking. I also need food. I have forwarded you the email under the proper address . . . 🙂

> [8/25/14, 6:34:45 AM] Jean Haines: Later 🙂

> [8/25/14, 6:34:58 AM] Michael Calhoun: ok. but I don’t have that old email address. ttyl

> [8/25/14, 6:49:57 AM] Michael Calhoun: please just sent a test .0001 bitcoin transfer to this address:

> [8/25/14, 6:50:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: On 8/25/14, at 6:32 AM, Michael Calhoun wrote:

> XXXXXXXXXX

> [8/25/14, 6:50:23 AM] Michael Calhoun: when i confirm that it went through ok, we can transfer the balance. Thanks.

> [8/25/14, 6:52:34 AM] Jean Haines: I sent you the email to the address you gave me this morning. . .

>

> I don’t know how to do this. We are going to have to talk – but later – so you can talk me through how to do it . . .

> [8/25/14, 6:52:53 AM] Jean Haines: Now, I’ve got to get off here for the moment. . .

> [8/25/14, 7:06:09 AM] Michael Calhoun: ok

> [8/25/14, 8:02:52 AM] Michael Calhoun: Let me know when it is a good time for u.

> [8/25/14, 8:16:46 AM] Jean Haines: Michael, I’m just back and have fed my dogs. Now comes me. I will get back to you ASAP. I promise.

> [8/25/14, 9:04:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: K

> [8/25/14, 10:14:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: R we close?

> [8/25/14, 10:24:47 AM] Jean Haines: Yes, let’s do it now. . . I’m just back from an errand I had to do . . .

> [8/25/14, 10:24:55 AM] Jean Haines: call me . . .

> [8/25/14, 10:26:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: I have to go down the hall. Give me 5 min. Peter skyped me that article and I too could not get to it. It was a blank white page

> [8/25/14, 10:26:19 AM] Jean Haines: It’s now on my blog 😉

> [8/25/14, 10:29:35 AM] Michael Calhoun: Call started

> [8/25/14, 10:31:10 AM] Michael Calhoun: XXXXXXXXXX

> [8/25/14, 10:31:16 AM] Michael Calhoun: .0001

> [8/25/14, 10:38:30 AM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

> Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 10.37.38 AM.png

> [8/25/14, 10:40:41 AM] Jean Haines: Call ended 11 minutes 6 seconds

> [8/25/14, 11:10:32 AM] Michael Calhoun: do you have a confirmation? I don’t

> [8/25/14, 11:12:09 AM] Jean Haines: Nope. I just closed out – in case – and reopened . . . and nothing has changed. . .

> [8/25/14, 11:12:37 AM] Jean Haines: oops. just now I got the picture of a clock in the status window . . .

> [8/25/14, 11:12:37 AM] Michael Calhoun: The account number is cutt off. can you open the transaction window and send me that?

> [8/25/14, 11:13:02 AM] Michael Calhoun: well, that’s progress. I don’t remember it taking time. Oh well.

> [8/25/14, 11:13:24 AM] Michael Calhoun: Let’s just wait for the status to finish up.

> [8/25/14, 11:13:45 AM] Jean Haines: Yes, I think so . . . it is what it is . . .

> [8/25/14, 11:54:31 AM] Michael Calhoun: It went through. Send the spendable balance to the exact same address. The balance after that we can send over once its available

> [8/25/14, 11:54:47 AM] Michael Calhoun: Do you want me to go online with you?

> [8/25/14, 12:20:33 PM] Michael Calhoun: you there?

> [8/25/14, 12:26:37 PM] Jean Haines: Okay, I will try . . . and if I get in trouble, I will have to call you . . .

> [8/25/14, 12:26:50 PM] Michael Calhoun: thanks.

> [8/25/14, 12:27:01 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’ll be here.

> [8/25/14, 12:27:50 PM] Jean Haines: Okay, I’m not getting a spendable balance ? ? ?

> [8/25/14, 12:28:14 PM] Jean Haines: That showed up when I sent the initial sum this morning . . . I think . . .

> [8/25/14, 12:29:19 PM] Jean Haines: Shall I try to send the entire balance and hope it will key me into what is possible?

> [8/25/14, 12:29:25 PM] Jean Haines: That is easily done. . .

> [8/25/14, 12:30:35 PM] Michael Calhoun: yes

> [8/25/14, 12:31:18 PM] Michael Calhoun: would you please skype me another screen shot when completed so I can confirm the numbers while its processing. Thanks, Jean.

> [8/25/14, 12:32:08 PM] Jean Haines: Sure, if it works 🙂

> [8/25/14, 12:34:22 PM] Jean Haines: It didn’t work. This is the message . . .

> [8/25/14, 12:34:31 PM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

> Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 12.33.54 PM.png

> [8/25/14, 12:35:08 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’ll take a look.

> [8/25/14, 12:38:54 PM] Jean Haines: I don’t have time to do the possible additon to figure it out . . . sorry . . . could you use my photos? That’s why I put them out there . . . so everybody could see . . .

> [8/25/14, 12:39:21 PM] Michael Calhoun: try sending 8.9. I think we need to leave enough to pay for the transaction

> [8/25/14, 12:40:51 PM] Jean Haines: I just thought how to do it . . . the first screen shot shows the ‘spendable amount. . . I will input that and try it . . . I couldn’t think how to access it 🙂 but we’ll see. I think it likely will work . . .

> [8/25/14, 12:41:23 PM] Michael Calhoun: I think we just did not allow for transaction fees

> [8/25/14, 12:41:55 PM] Jean Haines: I don’t know, but I will try the ‘spendable amount’ and let you know . . .

> [8/25/14, 12:42:00 PM] Michael Calhoun: ok

> [8/25/14, 12:43:29 PM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

> Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 12.42.42 PM.png

> [8/25/14, 12:43:34 PM] Jean Haines: it went

> [8/25/14, 12:44:04 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’ll figure out the fees for the final send.

> [8/25/14, 12:44:31 PM] Michael Calhoun: apparently you can’t send everything, there is no funds for transaction fees, which are tiny

> [8/25/14, 12:45:04 PM] Jean Haines: I”m not sure what you are saying . . . it went, didn’t it?

> [8/25/14, 12:45:53 PM] Michael Calhoun: yes. it did not go through the first time becuase we sent everything, and there was not a small amount to pay for the transaction. it’s like a fraction of a cent, but it is something.

> [8/25/14, 12:46:10 PM] Jean Haines: Here is the photo of the transaction. . .

> [8/25/14, 12:46:17 PM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

> Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 12.45.39 PM.png

> [8/25/14, 12:46:43 PM] Michael Calhoun: we have to do this one more time for the balance.

> [8/25/14, 12:46:48 PM] Michael Calhoun: less transfer fee.

> [8/25/14, 12:49:10 PM] Michael Calhoun: the transaction fee is apparently .0001

> [8/25/14, 12:49:24 PM] Jean Haines: Check the photo. It only says balance . . . nothing about ‘spendable.’ I think you likely have to open another account . . .and I need to close this one. . .

> [8/25/14, 12:49:28 PM] Michael Calhoun: you can probably send 1.569 now.

> [8/25/14, 12:49:37 PM] Michael Calhoun: that leaves .0001 for the fee

> [8/25/14, 12:49:44 PM] Jean Haines: No, I don’t think so, but I will try . . .

> [8/25/14, 12:51:40 PM] Jean Haines sent a file to this group:

> Screen Shot 2014-08-25 at 12.50.59 PM.png

> [8/25/14, 12:51:45 PM] Jean Haines: You were right . . . It’s all yours 🙂

> [8/25/14, 12:51:55 PM] Michael Calhoun: thanks, jean.

> [8/25/14, 12:52:00 PM] Jean Haines: Welcome 🙂

> [8/25/14, 12:52:15 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m going to read Peter’s piece finally, now.

> [8/25/14, 12:52:50 PM] Jean Haines: I haven’t even had a chance to breathe, let alone bathe . . . what can I say 🙂

> [8/25/14, 12:52:57 PM] Jean Haines: Enjoy it 🙂

> [8/25/14, 12:59:38 PM] Jean Haines: Michael I will automatically further any future requests to you . . . . 🙂

> [8/25/14, 12:59:53 PM] Michael Calhoun: thanks

> [8/25/14, 1:00:10 PM] Michael Calhoun: please don’t share that email. I’ll set up another non-business email for this.

> [8/25/14, 1:00:13 PM] Michael Calhoun: and get it to you.

> [8/25/14, 1:07:31 PM] Jean Haines: I wouldn’t share anything with anyone. . . I forwarded it to you . . . is that what you mean by ‘sharing’?

> [8/25/14, 1:07:48 PM] Jean Haines: This is business, Michael, and should remain totally private . . .

> [8/25/14, 1:08:24 PM] Michael Calhoun: I meant my . . . . . eamil. I’ll get another one. the kolab turned into requiring paypal. and i wasn’t interested in that. ill get a gmail for these sorts of things. take care, jean.

> [8/25/14, 1:08:38 PM] Michael Calhoun: we’re good, right?

> [8/25/14, 1:08:45 PM] Jean Haines: Michael, there isn’t anyone with whom I would share it . . .

> [8/25/14, 1:09:11 PM] Jean Haines: As long as you play fair with me, we’re good . . .

> [8/25/14, 1:09:37 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m not playing at all. I’m working full time and just trying to keep food on the table and a roof over our heads.

> [8/25/14, 1:09:59 PM] Michael Calhoun: and try to support those who are fighting the good fight.

> [8/25/14, 1:10:01 PM] Jean Haines: I don’t share business. . . not a good idea . . .that is this woman’s personal business, too — remember that

> [8/25/14, 1:10:11 PM] Michael Calhoun: ok. caio for now.

> [8/25/14, 1:10:20 PM] Jean Haines: Yes, I understand . . . it’s the same for me, you know . . .

> [8/25/14, 1:10:23 PM] Jean Haines: ciao

> [8/25/14, 1:10:49 PM] Jean Haines: Believe it or not, I suspect the Universe knows exactly what it is doing and that this will turn out just fine . . . 🙂

> [8/25/14, 1:11:16 PM] Michael Calhoun: I’m down with that.

> [8/25/14, 1:11:22 PM] Michael Calhoun: 😉

> [8/25/14, 1:12:10 PM] Jean Haines: It’s what helps me. . . I’ve learned to trust that as long as I do what I feel called to do, as long as I stay in a positive flow and stay centered and calm . . . everything is going according to a plan . . . and only now am I beginning to see the end plan . . .

>

> Still, a lot is required of us. . .

> [8/25/14, 1:12:27 PM] Jean Haines: . . . and believe me, it hasn’t been easy . . .

> [8/25/14, 1:13:01 PM] Jean Haines: I should have said the endgame . . . 🙂

>

> Okay, it’s 1:12 here, and I’m finally going to try to get a bath 🙂

> [8/25/14, 1:13:11 PM] Jean Haines: Bye for now 😉

> [8/25/14, 1:13:12 PM] Michael Calhoun: have a good one.

> [8/25/14, 1:13:25 PM] Jean Haines: It helps me to relax . .

> [8/26/14, 6:11:23 AM] Michael Calhoun: Nelu is free and with Neil !

> [8/26/14, 6:14:55 AM] Jean Haines: Yes, thank you, I read this. I remember two years ago when he was arrested. How different things are now. How sad! I wish him the best.

jean, you are mentioning endplan and endgame – it sounds terrible.. like you are in on the con.. why did you deal with him after he was being so aggressive.. jean.. you have to get wise.. they are setting you up for something.. now the next thing is important  – i think michael was setting you up here so that you would make some administrative decisions and practical applications on the bitcoin..  i don’t understand any of this, Jean.. but i told you not to trust him or anyone else.. i understand you too are tired and confused but you must stop talking and dealing with them.. they are dangerous men some of whom are convicted criminals.. just tell me what michael and you did there to the bitcoin account in plain english.. it is very hard to get the picture though …

[I can tell you that I don’t agree with Emily on this, and I never did. By then I was getting pretty tired of this deep, dark ‘stuff’ all the time from Emily. Mistake or not, I was beginning to want out. Frankly, at that point in time, I don’t think they were setting anyone up. I don’t think they are that quick. If Neil gets in trouble, he just lies. . . not very sophisticated, I think. And I still don’t like how Emily has convicted Michael publicly. I really, really don’t! ~J]

  Neil added your name to the thank you and peter eyre‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

 

To: jhaines6@me.com

This makes me think even more that you and peter are being set up .. they want you included in this because they don’t want you to expose it..

Re: Neil added your name to the thank you and peter eyre‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

 

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:49:26 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

Emily, if you continue to think  Neil is a part of a scam, you will be no help to me at all. This is absolutely not so, and it is confusing your thinking.

You have the comment – that had to come from Neil. Michael told me he sent to Neil, and probably he cleaned it up.

I sent you the original, u edited version – plus the work Michael and I did together to transfer the Bitcoin account to him the next day. This proves that while I had access, Michael always walked me through the process. I also have an audio of our working together to transfer the account, which I can’t send you.

Last night I copied the comment to Michael on skype and told him Neil was really concerned about your privacy?

He was shocked and said something about Neil releasing it to a third party… The person who made the comment.

Peter is not being set up. Neil wouldn’t dare go after Peter – with his investigative abilities? Are you kidding?

Neil is simply out to destroy mr. Period.

Get the idea of scam total,y out if your head, or I I’ll have to stand alone, and I don’t think I can do that.

All I knowia that when someone like Neil obsesses about something like this, he won’t stop unless he is hit very, very hard. He is sick, Emily, very sick now.

Sent from my iPad

RE: Neil added your name to the thank you and peter eyre‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: Jean Haines

jean, you are wrong, i am sorry but there is no other way to say this.. why are you reluctant to let me investigate it in the exact way i investigated silva.. you know i have integrity and will not try to distort the findings?  if i find neil had nothing to do with it then that will be a good thing.. i am not going to set out to find him guilty.. i am going to investigate it and send you the facts.. why are you afraid of this ?

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:58:02 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

Michaels early Skype to me was all bravado. You can see in my copy how he changed his tune. He tried to scare me, and I didn’t but into it.

Neil is being stupid, stupid, stupid, and we can’t say a word until we can knock him out of the box,

Michael isn’t angry with me, not really. He doesn’t want to fight.

I’ll bet he was the one who cleaned upmost of the conversation to protect himself. I dont know what he removed – my statements, or only his that show his change of heart.

Neil is totally screwed if we handle this properly, and I think in order to stop his forward momentum we have to mention the porn.

RE: . .‏

Emily Twomey

 

8/27/2014

To: Jean Haines

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:00:30 AM
To: Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

now you are being naive jean, michael didn’t change his tune.. he changed his tack.. he knew he wasn’t getting anywhere with you so he changed to being nice.. he needed you to do whatever it was he got you to do on the bitcoin account for some reason.. and that was why he changed his tack and you did it for him

[I find the above statement deeply offensive. How could Emily ever make that determination without proof?  ~J]

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com

8/27/2014

 

To: Emily Twomey

Michael did not set me up in that Skype conversation! [I do not now know if he did or didn’t, but Emily does —even though she can’t prove it! ~J]

Neil is not involved in a scam!!! [Until Emily proved it – and that came with the recognition that Count Albert is involved in the same sort of scam that Silva/Aidun are involved in, I simply couldn’t believe it. I”m sorry, but that is the truth. When Emily gave me irrefutable proof, when then of course I had to believe. Like I said, I was well and truly scammed . . . and I sense, although cannot prove that Michael was also . . . he told me he had $1000s of his own money in this, too. And I said, something like well, then, you’d better start to read and do your homework, working a full time job or no. . .~J]

You must stop thinking this way. I can prove it to you so easily, but it is very complex and we canons speak. Dr. Vandermeer….the history of how Neil got involved. The fact that after his friend tried to physically get to Neil to tell him he’d talked to ban Kim moon – and they murdered his friend before he could speak to Neil. There is so much you don’t know . . . And you are jumping to conclusions.

Please, please don’t do this!

You are right though, that as long as I say nothing, I’m okay. But Neil will only escalate. . .that is the way his sort works. He wants to break me completely.

His sickness has now come front and center because he sees himself losing the global accounts, as well he should, and he is desperate.

Sent from my iPad

Re: . .‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

 

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:21:19 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

You are wrong, Emily., wrong!

jean‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: jhaines6@me.com

“Dr. Vandermeer….the history of how Neil got involved. The fact that after his friend tried to physically get to Neil to tell him he’d talked to ban Kim moon – and they murdered his friend before he could speak to Neil. There is so much you don’t know . . . And you are jumping to conclusions”.

Everything you are telling me are ‘facts’ you heard from Neil. Do you actually have proof of Vandermeer – another doctor, how convenient – do you have proof they murdered his friend.. do you have proof that neil was not just using another typical con scam when he said he was poisoned.. could it not just have been a bug and he used it to confuse you.. the secret phonecall from the hospital  – are you sure about all that.  I am sorry jean, but you are shooting the messenger here.

Jean, i don’t want to argue with you about this and cause you more distress. When I research something whether it is about ancient Rome 2000 years ago or about anything in the present day.  I go on the facts.  I don’t deal with the emotive side of things.  Facts speak clearly and emotions cloud the facts.  It is not my fault that the facts I am seeing in black and white like the court documents Neil filed in 2012  (and colour i.e the photos neil held in his hand) speak very loudly about the chance that Neil may be guilty of a terrible con upon all the people who have trusted him.  You have a huge responsibility in this.  You encouraged people to support him and you presented him to people for years as somebody they could trust.

It would be much easier for me to walk away from this right now as my own family here are suffering from the amount of time I have been spending on this.  My kids are very good and patient but I should probably be spending more time with them than stuck here doing this.  However, I don’t think it is right what has been going on and I know I have the ability to help to rectify the situation.  I do not have the inclination to argue with you.  I cannot doctor my research findings to protect Neil if he is guilty, that is not a truthful way to go about it.  You can show the porn stuff if you like but you are getting into very sleazy waters and attacking him ad hominem.  You should yourself revisit all the stuff that I am able to find on the Internet with open eyes and not let past personal relationships interfere with your research.

————————————————————————————————————

Re: . .‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

I worked for months with Michael. I know him.

Neil is now willing to use Michael, without regard to the fact Michael wants privacy. [I said this because while I posted Michael’s name once, I was told Neil mentioned it numerous times on his blog . . . in a video, I’m guessing. I just can’t watch the stuff he is putting out there, so I am not sure. If Michael were such an important part of the scam, why is Neil now doing this to him? Could it be that Michael read up as I suggested and began to ask some tough questions? I do not know, and – guess what – neither does Emily Twomey!!! ~J]

You haven’t read my Skype word for word, and you really need to

Sent from my iPad

Re: jean‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

 

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

Emily, I k ow what  know, and this all took place in a very different time and place.

I can’t fight with you and have everyone else at me, too.

I’ll be okay.

I’ll manage,

Re: jean‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

 

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

Shall I send you the months and months if emails that passed between us?

Neil knows I have themm and they are My protection? They were all lies? Are you kidding?

Sent from my iPad

Re: jean‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

 

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:33:42 AM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

A statement I made to Emily: I think it is best we stop here. Your family is important, and I will be fine. I simply. Can’t fight you, Emily, when you have made up your mind that something is so that clearly is not so.

It’s oaky.

I’m grateful for all you have done. It was unbelievable, and I think it was clearly enough.

RE: jean‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: Jean Haines

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:34:39 AM
To: Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

maybe you should read them yourself with fresh eyes.. and depersonalise them and read between the lines.. [I would think reading between the lines is not acceptable to a top drawer researcher, but that is what Emily seems to have been doing in large part here – making pubic statements that are in fact only assumptions and offering them as facts, with no proof to back them up . . . ~J

RE: jean‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: Jean Haines

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:41:03 AM
To: Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

I haven’t made up my mind on anything Jean, I am saying that there are facts there that warrant the past two years of Neil’s involvement with the global accounts being investigated.  I do not understand why you are so reluctant to have it investigated if you are so sure that it is not true.  I do not manipulate research to further an end. That is not my way.

You have clearly spoken that you do not want this investigated. So I will get back to my life.  If you are in need, you know where I am.

Re: jean‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

 

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

Bo, Emily, I know what I know, but with little knowledge I’m afraid you have decided differently. That means you can be of little help to me.

It’s okay.

You didn’t sign on for this, and I realize this.

Now, i need to get some sleep in the time that is left to me.

I’m confident I will be okay. I have the universe in my side 🙂 I may stumble, but I will make it.

I know in my gut what I know, and you, looking on from the outside cannot convince me otherwise. You are trying to tell me what I know is a lie, anfpd that simply is not so . . .itt was something very special that went badly sour . . .

Nite for now. . .

Sent from my iPad

Re: jean‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

Emily, such an investigation would require months of your time, and neither you nor I have that kind of time. I am telling you at the very beginning that it will be a dead end, this makes no sense to me.

RE: jean‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

 

To: Jean Haines

it wouldn’t take me months, it would take me a couple of days.. i am really good at what I do.. and the universe is in on this.. i am finding cached documents that have been hidden deliberately with very little ease

it is not up to me though, to convince you.  that is up to your own conscience.  while it may be very hurtful to consider that you may have been majorly duped.. you must consider it ..

JEAN – I ADVISE YOU TO READ THIS ABOUT VAN DE MEER‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: jhaines6@me.com

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 12:20:16 PM
To: jhaines6@me.com (jhaines6@me.com

JEAN: READ FULFORDS ARTICLE – IT IS RUBBISH – READ THE HISTORY ORG REPORT ON VAN DE MEER ALSO KNOWN AS DR. MICHAEL MEIRING –

NOTE ONE:  Look at two paragraphs here in this 2012 Benjamin Fulford article printed below about Van de Meer AKA Dr. Michael Meiring, that are false

“Of course Dr. Van de Meer admits he was no angel and he had one huge regret in his life. When he was a young medical doctor in the 1950’s he was sent to Africa to work with Dr. Jonas Salk, a man known to us as the developer of the Polio vaccine. According to Dr. Van de Meer, who then went by the name of Dr. Michael Meiring, Salk and his team killed over 200,000 African green monkeys and sent their blood to the US (Nazi) biological weapons facility at Ft. Detrick.

He found out the blood was being used to develop a disease aimed at depopulating Africa. It is now known as HIV or AIDS.”

Jean, we know that aids was not developed from African green monkeys – but this knowledge wasn’t widely available in 2012 – how can van de meer’s statement be true  – from Rense: http://www.rense.com/general61/outof.htm

There are no scientific papers which uphold the green monkey theory. The monkey out of Africa theory lasted until the late 1990s when another group of American scientists claimed the virus definitely originated in a specific species of chimpanzee found in Africa.

The green monkey theory was scientifically doomed from the very start, although that apparently did not phase the scientists who undoubtedly wanted to place the blame on the dark continent — and take the origin of HIV out of Manhattan, where the first cases were discovered in 1979, and push the origin to the other side of the world.

“NOTE 2 “Dr. Van de Meer used to go by the name Dr. Michael Meiring until he had both his legs blown off by a bomb he said was set by people working for his arch-enemy George Bush Senior, the head of the Nazi Odessa group.”…

“Less than an hour later, I was stepping out of my room when I heard the explosion. I ran down the hall, turning two corners, and arriving at Dr. Michael’s room within seconds.  Heavy black smoke and extreme heat were pouring out of his door.  Two streams of blood led me away from his door and down the stairway.  Several flights down I saw two men dragging the corners of a bed sheet in which the body was wrapped. On the street a red pickup truck was waiting, into which the body was dumped.  As the body fell out of the sheet, the Dr. Michael I saw looked absolutely like a well-burned road kill, with limbs twisted at impossible angles.  The pickup truck sped off through the heavy traffic, and out of sight.

A few hours later, after initial surgery, the attending plastic surgeon met me in the hall at Doctor’s Hospital, Davao’s finest.  The surgeon informed me that the patient had sustained third-degree burns, much of it full-thickness, over forty-eight percent of his body, had severe burns of his mouth and throat, had inhaled and ingested flame-retarding chemicals,  had lost the lower portion of both legs,  and would probably lose his left arm.  The damage was far beyond the threshold for human survival.  That the patient still lived was miraculous, he said, but the attending physicians had no expectation that he would survive much longer.

When Dr. Michael was returned to his room, he was wrapped in gauze from top to bottom, with only a space for pulmonary and stomach tubes, and just his right ear, arm and hand free (Think “The Invisible Man”!).  He immediately signaled with his free hand that he wished to write.  I put a pen in his hand and held a legal pad on which he scribbled, “Better to be a live dog than a dead lion!”  Over those difficult days, by writing humor and showing a personal interest in each person attending him, he kept everyone in his environment in a positive attitude. Dr. Michael wrote instructions to his attending physicians, many quite unconventional, but all exhibiting a deep knowledge of trauma medicine. He did not lose consciousness, always refused anesthesia, and never appeared to sleep.  He insisted upon inserting his own breathing and feeding tubes, and dictated his own healing diet.  On the third day, one doctor told me, “We don’t know who he is, but we are learning much from this man.” Although he credited me with saving his life, ultimately it was Dr. Michael himself who was responsible for his survival.”

Jean, now read the version of these events from HIstoryCommons.Org –

Profile: Michael Meiring

Michael Meiring was a participant or observer in the following events:

Early 1990s and After: Mysterious Links Seen between Right Wing Westerners and Philippine Muslim Militants

Profile: Michael Meiring

Michael Meiring was a participant or observer in the following events:

1992-1993: Suspected CIA Operative Has Ties to Philippine Militant Leaders

Michael Meiring, a suspected CIA operative connected to Philippine militant groups (see May 16, 2002), first comes to the Philippines and lives there for a year. According to a later report by the Manila Times, Meiring lives in the capital of Manila and is frequently seen with two agents of the Philippine National Bureau of Investigation (NBI). Yet at the same time he is believed to have ties with the top leaders of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), which, together with the Abu Sayyaf, are the main Muslim militant groups in the southern Philippines. “Meiring’s connections with rebel leaders made the military wary about him. He was under surveillance by more than one intelligence unit on more than one occasion.” One close US friend later claims that in 1992 Meiring said he had found and sold a box full of US Federal Reserve notes worth more than $500 million. It is believed that he spends millions of dollars while in the Philippines. [MANILA TIMES, 5/29/2002] (There appear to have been frequent scams in the Philippines involving millions and even billions of dollars of fraudulent US Federal Reserve notes.) [TIME, 2/26/2001] Meiring, a former citizen of South Africa, fled to the US when he became the subject of an investigation toward the end of South Africa’s apartheid regime. He then became a US citizen. Meiring is connected to a group of treasure hunters led by James Rowe, an American. Rowe connects with a group of right-wing white supremacists linked to the US neo-Nazi party. In 1993, Meiring and Rowe travel to the Philippines together. [MANILA TIMES, 5/30/2002] Meiring will come and go between the US and the Philippines for the next ten years, claiming to be a treasure hunter. In 2002 he will be severely injured by a bomb he is trying to make and will be whisked out of the Philippines by US officials (see May 16, 2002) andDecember 2, 2004). Philippine officials have observed other right-wing Americans with ties to Muslim militants starting in the early 1990s (see Early 1990s and After). [MANILA TIMES, 5/29/2002]

NOW READ FULFORD’S FULL ARTICLE –

Benjamin Fulford:  08/22/2012  http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/2012/08/obituary-dr-michael-van-de-meer-aka-dr-michael-meiring-aka-the-real-james-bond.html

Obituary: Dr. Michael Van de Meer, AKA Dr. Michael Meiring, AKA??? the real James Bond

The fictional character James Bond does not hold a candle to the real McCoy, the man I knew as Dr. Michael Van de Meer. In one of his rare moments of immodesty, Dr. Van de Meer once told me that “what James Bond does is rather tame compared to what I have done.” This man was unique and will be sorely missed by all who knew him.

When I first met him in person, he showed me an attaché case containing an Uzi and 7 passports, all real and all with his photo on them. The attaché case had a bullet proof lining. While I was visiting him in the Philippines somebody tried to kill him by dumping large amounts of insecticide into the ventilating system of his hotel room. This was apparently not an unusual sort of occurrence for him. In any case, I was privileged to get, through him, a glimpse at the reality of top of world espionage and intrigue. To him CIA stood for Christ In Action.

Dr. Van de Meer used to go by the name Dr. Michael Meiring until he had both his legs blown off by a bomb he said was set by people working for his arch-enemy George Bush Senior, the head of the Nazi Odessa group.

Although Dr. Van de Meer was very reluctant to discuss his past, every once in a while he would release little nuggets of information about his extraordinary life. He said he grew up in a castle near the ancestral home of Sir Francis Drake. He also once let slip that he was a cousin of Queen Elizabeth and Evelyn de Rothschild, who he described as “not very nice people.”

His father, he claims, was a senior official in the British Raj, who worked with Mohandas Gandhi. My own research has led me to believe he at one point held the hereditary title of Lord Mountbatten, something he always denied.

What I learned through him is that when the British overlords left India, they took with them all the historical gold and treasure they could get their hands on. This gold was then allocated to a fund meant to be used for the benefit of the planet earth and its people. Many other nations and groups also allocated their historical treasures to this fund.

When a group of Nazis and fascists murdered President John F. Kennedy and started illegally using this money to finance their project for a fascist “New World Order,” Dr. Van de Meer set out to stop them.

The early James Bond movies are based in part of Van de Meer’s battle against them. The cat-petting villain Ernst Stavro Blofeld, who featured in the original James Bond films written by Ian Fleming, was based on Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, according to MI5 sources. Canaris was not executed during World War 2 for trying to assassinate Hitler and in fact became head of the Nazi Odessa underground after World War 2. It was Van de Meer and his team’s battles against Canaris and his group that formed the basis of the original James Bond novels. Van de Meer himself appears briefly as a young British businessman in the movie Thunderball. Canaris was eventually defeated by Van de Meer only to be replaced by George Bush Senior as the head of Odessa.

Of course Dr. Van de Meer admits he was no angel and he had one huge regret in his life. When he was a young medical doctor in the 1950’s he was sent to Africa to work with Dr. Jonas Salk, a man known to us as the developer of the Polio vaccine. According to Dr. Van de Meer, who then went by the name of Dr. Michael Meiring, Salk and his team killed over 200,000 African green monkeys and sent their blood to the US (Nazi) biological weapons facility at Ft. Detrick.

He found out the blood was being used to develop a disease aimed at depopulating Africa. It is now known as HIV or AIDS.

From that point on his career is something of a mystery. He once told me though of a narrow escape in the Congo where he was forced to confront mass murdering gun-men after crossing a Congo river filled with “hundreds of thousands of bloated dead bodies.”

After his time in Africa, Van de Meer spent 20 years in Asia, mostly the Philippines, researching the mystery of the missing “Yamashita gold” that imperial Japan stashed there during World War 2. He was one of the primary sources for the book “Gold Warriors,” written by Sterling Seagrave.

What Van de Meer learned was that much of the world’s historical gold was being plundered by Nazis. He set out to stop them and that was when Canaris disciple Bush bombed him.

Here is testimony of that event by a good friend of Dr. Michael’s:

The Dr. Michael I met was a neatly-dressed, well-groomed, gentleman, who moved with the power of a body-builder, the grace of a dancer, and the confidence of a man accustomed to command.  Strikingly handsome, with sky-blue eyes that held one’s attention, he spoke with a high British accent.

Dr. Michael was a man on mission.  Once, he opened the Bible that was always near his bed, turning to a passage where God said he would reveal all the hidden wealth in the world, and restore it to the people.  Dr. Michael told me that God had commissioned him to fulfill that promise, to relieve poverty, to renew the land, and to restore Creation to its intended state. In nearly every conversation with me, Dr. Michael found an opportunity to affirm his commitment to returning to the poor and oppressed that which had been taken from them.  He was passionate about building a world network of teaching hospitals and vocational education centers, and engaged in an unrelenting search for the necessary resources. At age sixty-four he would bound up four stories of stairway to his room, with no accelerated breathing.

After breakfast one fateful day, we parted ways.  Dr. Michael, formally attired in a 3-piece suit, went to a meeting, while I took care of business related to the rural youth center I was building.  We agreed to meet again an hour later, to discuss a rural development proposal that had been handed to Dr. Michael.

Less than an hour later, I was stepping out of my room when I heard the explosion. I ran down the hall, turning two corners, and arriving at Dr. Michael’s room within seconds.  Heavy black smoke and extreme heat were pouring out of his door.  Two streams of blood led me away from his door and down the stairway.  Several flights down I saw two men dragging the corners of a bed sheet in which the body was wrapped. On the street a red pickup truck was waiting, into which the body was dumped.  As the body fell out of the sheet, the Dr. Michael I saw looked absolutely like a well-burned road kill, with limbs twisted at impossible angles.  The pickup truck sped off through the heavy traffic, and out of sight.

A few hours later, after initial surgery, the attending plastic surgeon met me in the hall at Doctor’s Hospital, Davao’s finest.  The surgeon informed me that the patient had sustained third-degree burns, much of it full-thickness, over forty-eight percent of his body, had severe burns of his mouth and throat, had inhaled and ingested flame-retarding chemicals,  had lost the lower portion of both legs,  and would probably lose his left arm.  The damage was far beyond the threshold for human survival.  That the patient still lived was miraculous, he said, but the attending physicians had no expectation that he would survive much longer.

When Dr. Michael was returned to his room, he was wrapped in gauze from top to bottom, with only a space for pulmonary and stomach tubes, and just his right ear, arm and hand free (Think “The Invisible Man”!).  He immediately signaled with his free hand that he wished to write.  I put a pen in his hand and held a legal pad on which he scribbled, “Better to be a live dog than a dead lion!”  Over those difficult days, by writing humor and showing a personal interest in each person attending him, he kept everyone in his environment in a positive attitude. Dr. Michael wrote instructions to his attending physicians, many quite unconventional, but all exhibiting a deep knowledge of trauma medicine. He did not lose consciousness, always refused anesthesia, and never appeared to sleep.  He insisted upon inserting his own breathing and feeding tubes, and dictated his own healing diet.  On the third day, one doctor told me, “We don’t know who he is, but we are learning much from this man.” Although he credited me with saving his life, ultimately it was Dr. Michael himself who was responsible for his survival.

My own connection to Dr. Michael began a few years ago after I survived my own murder attempts by the same group of Nazis. He contacted me through Kerry Cassidy after I appeared on an interview on Project Camelot. He saved my life by telling me that Madame Wu was bad mouthing me to the Triads because she was being blackmailed by George Bush Senior about a slush fund she had illegally accumulated overseas. I later heard that Madame Wu was tortured to death after the Chinese found out about her treason.

In any case, Dr. Van de Meer provided me with an education in the secret world at the very top of the financial system. He also pointed me and Neil Keenan towards the Green Hilton Memorial accord as being the reason for the Kennedy assassination and the historical root of the financial crisis we now face.

The members of Asian secret societies who knew him said that despite his tendency to look down on them, they knew he was, in his heart of hearts, a good man who they wanted to work with.

That is why they approached me and asked me to send $750 billion dollars’ worth of gold backed Kennedy bonds to him. I asked for his snail mail address in order to send him the bonds. It was shortly after he sent me his address that he suddenly died “in his sleep” despite being in robust health and full of plans for the future.

His family refuses to talk about his death and no official autopsy has been made public. We are certain he was murdered and know who was responsible. Rest assured Dr. Michael will not have died in vain. He will be avenged and his dreams of “ending poverty and turning the deserts green” will be realized.

Benjamin Fulford

Posted at 13:23 | Permalink

Jean.‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: jhaines6@me.com

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:10:22 PM
To: jhaines6@me.com (jhaines6@me.com)

Jean, you tried to tell Neil Keenan that there was something very suspicious about Naidu and what did he do?  He told you he didn’t want to know.  I am trying to tell you there is something very suspicious about the origin of the global accounts project in 2011/2012 and what are you telling me – you don’t want to know.  In that case, I am going to research this anyway under my own name  because I now know too much about the whole situation.  I will be honest and truthful in my research and I will show the finished product to you before I show it to anyone else.  But if i do find out that the whole thing has been a con from start to finish I will be morally obligated to give my findings to someone who will do the right thing with them.  During my research I am sure I will find out who that person should be….

I will keep an eye on your situation and if I feel you are in dire straits I will step in and help you the best I can if you wish.  If you really need for anything I am only an email away.  I cannot however participate at the level I have been doing if you don’t trust my judgement.  I do not have the time to waste on trying to convince you of anything.  As I told you, I do not know anything concrete yet but the evidence is rapidly mounting that Fulford, Van de Meyer, Poof and others were all in on the global accounts from the beginning and that Neil was used as the front man.  There is a chance Neil may have been duped by them but his appaling behaviour lately and his lack of accountability or concern in clearing his name in answer to your questions, leave me seriously in doubt in this.  I am not one to beat about the bush as you know and this is my assessment of the situation. ….

FYI: My Skype conversation with Michael . . . this morning . . . Michael is innocent and totally naive . . .‏

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

[8/27/14, 5:49:05 AM] Michael Calhoun: I don’t know how that was intercepted, or by whom. As far as I’m concerned it was a private conversation and I didn’t ok it’s public use. We worked it out and that’s left out of the context. But as far as I know it’s not been made public, and may not be unless you are publishing it, which, of course, I would suggest you do not.

[8/27/14, 6:21:35 AM] Jean Haines: Michael, I feel certain after a lot of of thought that Neil himself released this to what I can only call a troll, to someone who works for him. Who else had it? Obviously, your privacy is now of little concern to him. This person did not research this. It appears nowhere else on the Internet. Have you asked Neil about it? I think you should.

[8/27/14, 6:22:06 AM] Michael Calhoun: I will.

[8/27/14, 6:23:43 AM] Jean Haines: Did you edit this. Or did Neil?

[8/27/14, 6:24:10 AM] Michael Calhoun: This is the first I’ve ever seen of it, other than writing you.

[8/27/14, 6:24:57 AM] Jean Haines: No, I’m talking about the Skype conversation. It has been edited. Who did it?

[8/27/14, 6:25:27 AM] Michael Calhoun: As I said, I copied Neil on our conversation in order to get authority to accept the bitcoins. I did not editing or releasing of that skype conversation.

[8/27/14, 6:25:36 AM] Jean Haines: Didn’t you send some version of this to Neil?

[8/27/14, 6:26:15 AM] Michael Calhoun: I copied and pasted our conversation for background on getting authority to release the bitcoin. Instead of paraphrasing our conversation, I gave it to him word for word.

[8/27/14, 6:26:27 AM] Michael Calhoun: I did not editing.

[8/27/14, 6:26:30 AM] Jean Haines: So Neil knows what I said to you – all of it.

[8/27/14, 6:26:43 AM] Michael Calhoun: Just the part about the bitcoin.

[8/27/14, 6:26:45 AM] Michael Calhoun: account

[8/27/14, 6:26:51 AM] Michael Calhoun: not all of it

[8/27/14, 6:27:13 AM] Jean Haines: He did receive all of it then. . .

[8/27/14, 6:27:26 AM] Michael Calhoun: no, just the part about the bitcoin account

[8/27/14, 6:27:31 AM] Jean Haines: But he thinks he did.

[8/27/14, 6:28:07 AM] Michael Calhoun: No. I told him I was carrying on a dialoge with you to conclude the bitcoin matter. He knows I want to maintain a cordial relationship with you.

[8/27/14, 6:29:09 AM] Jean Haines: Okay.

[8/27/14, 6:30:02 AM] Michael Calhoun: I’m not in the burn jean to the ground club, nor the smear Neil club. I don’t go there.

[8/27/14, 6:30:20 AM] Michael Calhoun: I’m in this for other motives.

[8/27/14, 6:30:51 AM] Michael Calhoun: I contacted Neil to see what I can do to make a difference with his work.

[8/27/14, 6:31:20 AM] Michael Calhoun: over a year ago. And I’ve put in thousands of dollars, and untold thousands of hours as a volunteer.

[8/27/14, 6:32:12 AM] Michael Calhoun: My wife lost her job, and we are struggling. I had to take a more than full time job in dc. So I’m sidelined for the time being.

[8/27/14, 6:32:16 AM] Jean Haines: So did I Michael, most of my savings.

[8/27/14, 6:32:25 AM] Michael Calhoun: out of financial necessity.

[8/27/14, 6:32:36 AM] Jean Haines: I have nothing left.

[8/27/14, 6:32:50 AM] Michael Calhoun: Take a break.

[8/27/14, 6:33:42 AM] Jean Haines: So are you aware that Neil is conducting a smear campaign against me that isn’t going very well, at least not among thinking people?

[8/27/14, 6:33:53 AM] Jean Haines: And do what?

[8/27/14, 6:34:10 AM] Michael Calhoun: No. I just don’t have the time or energy to follow it right now.

[8/27/14, 6:34:26 AM] Michael Calhoun: I’m working 60+ hours a week in dc

[8/27/14, 6:34:48 AM] Jean Haines: Well, for your own protection, you really need to.

[8/27/14, 6:35:06 AM] Michael Calhoun: I don’t know what that means.

[8/27/14, 6:35:14 AM] Jean Haines: Watch his videos. He is brutal.

[8/27/14, 6:35:36 AM] Michael Calhoun: What does that have to do with my protection?

[8/27/14, 6:36:01 AM] Jean Haines: He obviously is do bent on destroying me, that he now has no concern for you.

[8/27/14, 6:36:11 AM] Jean Haines: Or your privacy

[8/27/14, 6:36:27 AM] Michael Calhoun: He hasn’t done anything to hurt me or compromise my privacy.

[8/27/14, 6:36:32 AM] Jean Haines: What about your money? I

[8/27/14, 6:36:39 AM] Jean Haines: No?

[8/27/14, 6:37:01 AM] Michael Calhoun: I trust him to take care of that. I’ve seen him in action with others.

[8/27/14, 6:37:06 AM] Michael Calhoun: when he can.

[8/27/14, 6:37:19 AM] Jean Haines: He released that Skype document, and really then there is no reason for me not to publish it.

[8/27/14, 6:37:58 AM] Michael Calhoun: You’re a flame thrower. He did not release it. someone sent it to you.

[8/27/14, 6:38:18 AM] Jean Haines: How did they get it?

[8/27/14, 6:38:31 AM] Michael Calhoun: you’re back threatening my privacy. not niel. Neil has not breached my privacy online at all.

[8/27/14, 6:38:32 AM] Jean Haines: From whom?

[8/27/14, 6:38:52 AM] Jean Haines: It had to be you or Neil.

[8/27/14, 6:39:16 AM] Michael Calhoun: I don’t know. But if you publish it, we are back at square one. And I’m not accepting you’re blackmail to put pressure on neil or you will expose me and my family.

[8/27/14, 6:40:09 AM] Michael Calhoun: If it is all right with you, i will copy this conversation to Neil and ask if he knows how the conversation was intercepted and sent to you, edited.

[8/27/14, 6:40:10 AM] Jean Haines: Michael, if you don’t do your homework and blindly trust Neil, then you will have to accept the consequences.

[8/27/14, 6:40:24 AM] Michael Calhoun: I’m not taking consequences from you.

[8/27/14, 6:40:58 AM] Michael Calhoun: I have to get back to work.

[8/27/14, 6:41:03 AM] Michael Calhoun: ttyl

[8/27/14, 6:41:12 AM] Michael Calhoun: dont post your shit about me on your blog.

[8/27/14, 6:41:52 AM] Michael Calhoun: Neil is not publishing my name on his blog, and sending a comment to you is not a license for you to stab me in the back and expose my family.

[8/27/14, 6:43:27 AM] Jean Haines: Before you do that I suggest you read the recent articles on my blog, Neil refused to do the research, so I did. The last one starts with something in the title about being busted. Neil was into something illegal, and I proved it. If he is innocent, why hadn’t he said. Why hadn’t he answered the legal questions? Why has he resorted to smearing me?

[8/27/14, 6:44:09 AM] Jean Haines: I have my conversations with Neil all documented

[8/27/14, 6:44:39 AM] Michael Calhoun: I have to get back to work.

[8/27/14, 6:44:47 AM] Jean Haines: Okay

[8/27/14, 6:45:00 AM] Jean Haines: I need to walk my dogs.

[8/27/14, 6:46:09 AM] Michael Calhoun: I just skyped niel. He said he has not released it to anyone. So it was intercepted by someone somehow.

[8/27/14, 6:47:53 AM] Jean Haines: Don’t be naive, Michael read those articles

[8/27/14, 6:54:27 AM] Jean Haines: Colorado Supreme Court – PERSONS AND BUSINESSES ORDERED TO STOP ENGAGING IN THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW

[8/27/14, 6:54:40 AM] Jean Haines: What is going on at Cosmic Voice today ? ? ? . . . by ~Jean

More information on Naidu now coming in from other sources . . . ~J

Early on a friend, who shall remain namelss, alerted me to the reality of the good Dr. Aidun . . .

[8/27/14, 6:55:03 AM] Jean Haines: ABA/BNA Lawyers’ Manual on Professional Conduct, Current Reports™

[8/27/14, 6:57:15 AM] Jean Haines: ******* IMPORTANT STATEMENT FROM ~Jean — Addressing Legitimate Concerns re: Judge Navin Naidu (aka Dr. Aidun of the Neil Keenan Team) and the alleged ‘king’ Silva

[8/27/14, 6:57:58 AM] Jean Haines: Kauilapele sends ~Jean an email regarding the so-called King of Hawaii, and ~Jean responds . . . ~J

——————————————————————————————————————–

RE: FYI: My Skype conversation with Michael . . . this morning . . . Michael is innocent and totally naive . . .‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: Jean Haines

Jean, I am not going to continuously do this anymore..it is too exhausting.. You are not interpreting the situation correctly.. and you ignore my advice so really i am defunct in the situation and i would prefer to concentrate on the research i need to do and not keep having to convince you that i think your judgement is flawed in relation to this whole situation.

Michael made a big mistake – look at the last line of the earlier skype post…

‘”she pretty much says she doesn’t know what the fuck”.. he definitely didn’t mean to include that when he copied and pasted the stuff to you.. he said that to Neil… it was a set up.. neil asked michael to skype you to 1. persuade you to backdown 2.  to try to find out how much you know 3. to threaten you by saying they could destroy your reputation

That is his answer to Neil’s probably telling him.. Get on to Jean and find out what she knows.

Jean, I cannot waste my time constantly convincing you about this..  you are in to close to the situation.. it is so obvious for people looking in from a distance to see this.. read the comments from people you know who are smart and if you read them OBJECTIVELY you will see I am right..

I strongly advise you not to trust Michael anymore, other than that, Jean, I am not going to constantly point out things to you.. you have made a mistake getting back even there to michael.. i tried to warn you about it…there isn’t much i can do if you don’t take my advice..

i am just heading out the door now ….  so i wont be near a computer.. for your own sake Jean, you need to start getting wise about this .. and start thinking things through before you trust what someone like michael is saying to you.. for gods sake jean he is accusing you of blackmail.

i will do my research and i will send you the findings.. i will not accept anything except concrete proof before i decide whether someone is involved or not.. jean, i can’t accept your opinion on michael.. it doesn’t read that way.. you are far too close to this to be objective.

i wont be taking into consideration anything you have sent me in relation to my research, your judgement is marred by your close relationship to these people.. i will be conducting an objective research and i will send you my findings when i am done.

all i can say is i have become very fond of you and i really want you to take good care of yourself and think carefully before you say or do anything.

love emily x

jean – naidus latest about you‏

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

 

To: jhaines6@me.com

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 2:32:36 PM
To: jhaines6@me.com (jhaines6@me.com)

http://www.scripturalaw.org/JEAN-HAINES-ESCAPES.pdf

Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

 

8/27/2014

To: Emily Twomey

From:  Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:07:16 PM
To: Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com)

Emily, you are viewing this situation from your own biases. You are interpreting things incorrectly. I have thought long and hard about things ever since I met Neil, and I have learned to know that of which I speak. I know exactly what I am going to do with that comment . . . but I think you are right that it is better that you do not involve yourself with me further. You are ‘the best’ in basic research, but because you do not yet know yourself, you do not know others, and you, therefore, are coming to false conclusions. You cannot make quick decisions based on the motives of other people unless you truly know yourself, and you have not yet reached that place. (I now do not think you are a ONE 🙂

I hope you do not further muddy the waters with incorrect analysis of this situation, taking what I shared with you in privacy as a jumping off point, and then going public with it. I think this would be a huge mistake on your part and will further complicate my own work, but you must make your own choice. At any rate, you are surely being invited to learn lessons, and that is what this is all about.

You have arrived on this scene very lately, have little to no background, and have made a decision based on very little foundation. You cannot trust me, apparently, to know that of which I speak. I can’t work with you for that reason, Emily.

Thank you for all the help you have given me. I think the Universe is inviting me to move on.

Neil is a very sick man, and he needs help. For whatever reason he has spent an entire lifetime alone, and he cannot relate to other people. He always ran small, very successful operations in which he could hire/fire, and push people around at will. This is far too big for that, and he doesn’t know how to deal with it. Hopefully, the Dragon Family will step in when they see it has gone far enough and try to help him – if he will accept that help. It will be his choice . . . he is a good man, but he too had traumas in his life, and he is being invited to deal with them – as are we all . . .

Love and hugs,

~Jean

Emily Twomey

8/27/2014

To: Jean Haines

From:  Emily Twomey (emilyatwomey@hotmail.com) You moved this message to its current location.
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:07:39 PM
To: Jean Haines (jhaines6@me.com)

The dragon family is a con …be careful there too – Jean, with all due respect.. anything I have said to you is based on solid research and i will soon be able to prove it to you.. but i am concerned for you that you will make serious mistakes before then which will hurt you.. but as i said before we all have to have personal responsibility and that too is your choice.. i have no axe to grind here with anyone .. i have been observing this scene for the last three years.. neil and co never reasonated me.. that is why i never bothered to research it before.. you have been heavily duped by these people.. they needed people like you and peter eyre to work on their case to get Nelu out of jail.. in quite the same scenario as Kaluna gave an order to Sinkin to ‘get the king out of jail’.   this is the last i will say on the matter as you are determined not to seek the truth because you know it will hurt you.. and I am certainly not jumping off point.. my advice to you is to really wonder why neil would show fake gold dollars and say that they were 1936 federal reserve bills and then research past cons related to the exact same dated bills and the exact same myths…

for the record, i told you i wasn’t one and i never would be aspire to be a one.  i am what i am – and i am proud of who and what i am and so is everybody who really knows me.

jean, you are a lovely person but you have allowed yourself to become embroiled in something that is so far beneath you.. these people are not nice..

Note from Emily – Since these emails I have a gained a much greater clarity on the whole global accounts fraud and its perpetrators – I hope to share it with you all soon –

This entry was posted in Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to UPDATED: ~Jean’s response to Emily Twomey’s very long post. I’ve stayed up very late in order to get this most unpleasant task out of the way. . . September 11, 2014

  1. pupma says:

    A lovely little anecdote, about one of life’s more interesting characters:When Mahatma Gandhi was studying law at the University College of London, a whiteprofessor, whose last name was Peters, disliked him intensely and alwaysdisplayed prejudice and animosity towards him.Also, because Gandhi never lowered his head when addressing him as heexpected, there were always “arguments” and confrontations.One day, Mr. Peters was having lunch at the dining room of theUniversity, and Gandhi came along with his tray and sat next to the

    professor. The professor said, ”

    Mr Gandhi, you do not understand. A pig and a bird do not sit together to
    eat.”Gandhi looked at him as a parent would a rude child and calmly
    replied, “You do not worry professor. I’ll fly away,” and he went and sat
    at another table.

    Mr. Peters, reddened with rage, decided to take revenge on the next test
    paper, but Gandhi responded brilliantly to all questions.

    Mr. Peters, unhappy and frustrated, asked him the following question. “Mr
    Gandhi, if you were walking down the street and found a package, and
    within was a bag of wisdom and another bag with a lot of money, which one
    would you take?”
    Without hesitating, Gandhi responded, “The one with the money, of course.”

    Mr. Peters,
    smiling sarcastically said, “I, in your place, would have taken the
    wisdom.”
    Gandhi shrugged indifferently and responded, “Each one takes what he
    doesn’t have.”

    Mr. Peters, by this time was fit to be tied. So great was his anger that
    he wrote on Gandhi’s exam sheet the word “idiot” and gave it to Gandhi.

    Gandhi took the exam sheet and sat down at his desk, trying very hard to
    remain calm while he contemplated his next move.A few minutes later,
    Gandhi got up,
    went to the professor and said to him in a dignified but
    sarcastically
    polite tone, “Mr. Peters, you autographed the sheet, but you did not
    give me the grade.”

    Terri ((:

  2. Marilyn says:

    Was your comment aimed at me Jean ? If so, please forgive me. My only intention was to offer support, especially since you wrote in a previous blog of the problem. It’s only natural to “imagine” or “assume” that all of the above has caused you stress and it follows that our pets pick this up.. Yes, my offer was “unsolicited” – how I wish everyone in the world would offer “unsolicited help” to others and that this be accepted or not, but with the same kindness.

    • Jean says:

      Marilyn, I realize you were well intentioned . . . but I will try to address the topic of assumptions one day soon. . . it can be a painful minefield for the recipient, and I hope I might help you – and others – see that fact . . . It is all in how you present your ideas . . . but more on that at another time 😉 Hugs, ~Jean

  3. Marilyn says:

    p.s. Jean, I forgot to add that you must remind yourself that are doing a grand job, “some” may not seem able to appreciate this – but that is “their” problem.

    • Jean says:

      🙂 It has been extremely difficult, but I am determined to see it through . . .thanks and hugs, ~Jean

      • Hi Jean. Please take a rest first of all. My feeling is that it may be time for us light workers to leave this plain now or very soon and continue to work from another dimension in which we can operate a lot better, I know it is difficult and the wanting to commit suicide is coming through more intense from the dark forces. Namaste.. Harry

        • Jean says:

          No, Harry, I don’t think this will happen at all . . . but we are splitting off, I think. . . there will be a gradual split is what I’m thinking . . . and you can’t believe how much better I feel . . . I did rest, and I’m moving on . . . 🙂 Hugs, ~Jean

  4. Jean says:

    May I suggest you are falling into the huge trap of making – perhaps well meaning – assumptions? Why waste your time! You have no idea, not really what is going on, so why don’t you just live your own life and work on your own issues, which may just have something to do with learning not to make assumptions – particularly when they aren’t solicited? Hugs, ~jean

  5. Zooey says:

    Isn’t it ironic that these words, “I could make one call and have her rubbed out,” are the words that are bringing Keenan down?

    As anyone who follows my own work can attest, this is exactly the kind of nonsense that we have outgrown. The world has grown so weary of alpha males / females and their neverending abuse of trust and power that they have become their own worst enemies.

    So, I leave you with the wise words that my mentor, teacher, and witch extraordinaire taught me so many years ago:

    ‘One does not have to strike down an enemy–just show them the way to their own end and they will surely perish.’

  6. Jean says:

    Please note that I have updated this post. Hugs, ~Jean

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s