Alfred Webre: Transhumanist Agenda War Crimes Tribunal “DECONSTRUCTING THE TRANSHUMANIST AGENDA”

Citizen’s War Crimes Tribunal to prosecute Transhumanist Agenda

Transhumanist Agenda War Crimes Tribunal

Public Announcement

Thursday Nov. 27, 2014

The Transhumanist Agenda War Crimes Tribunal is pleased to announce it is in formation and will be launching in Spring 2015.

Citizen’s War Crimes Tribunal to prosecute Transhumanist Agenda

Kevin Annett announced on Nov. 25, 2014 that he would be joining a Transhumanist Agenda War Crimes Tribunal announced on Nov. 20, 2014 at the Covert Harassment Conference in Brussels. The mission of the Citizen’s Tribunal is to prosecute, try, adjudicate, sentence, and enforce against perpetrators at all levels in the Transhumanist Agenda including the use of new physics torture and mind control/robotization weapons; the use of mind-control technologies in any and all human settings; and the robotization of humans.

Kevin Annett will be a Judge on the War Crimes Tribunal, along with Alfred Lambremont Webre, former Judge on the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal.

Former Belgian Parliament MP Laurent Louis has agreed to serve as Prosecutor for the Tribunal.


Here are some background documents on the Transhumanist Agenda addressed by the Tribunal:

  1. Geoengineering, Fukushima radiation, & the Transhumanist Agenda

by Alfred Lambremont Webre

Covert Harassment Conference 2014 with NSA Whistleblower William Binney


​2. ​Alfred Webre: Citizen’s war crimes Tribunal, International Statute, Comprehensive enforcement to end Transhumanist Agenda  



​3.  Global Communique from The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS): November 15, 2014 – The Evidence that forced Pope Benedict to Resign is Now Available

​4.  Global Communique from The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS): November 15, 2014 – The Evidence that forced Pope Benedict to Resign is Now Available

Global Communique from The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS): November 15, 2014 – The Evidence that forced Pope Benedict to Resign is Now Available

Documentation of Genocide and Child Murder in Canada – Issued from the court record of The International Common Law Court of Justice, Brussels
(Case Docket No. 02252013, The People v. Joseph Ratzinger, Elizabeth Windsor et al)


The ITCCS has just released the complete set of testimonies and documents that convicted the government and churches of Canada, the Vatican and the Crown of England, and their officers, of planning, committing and concealing crimes against humanity.

These 150 exhibits formed the basis of the verdict of February 25, 2013 that sentenced Pope Benedict, Queen Elizabeth, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and others to twenty-five years in prison without parole, and stripped them of their office and authority.

This historic verdict lawfully disestablishes the Crown of England and the Vatican as legitimate bodies, and authorizes the seizure of all church and crown property, lands and assets under the authority of the common law and new constitutional Republics.

Please post and share these historic records, and help our common law sheriffs enforce these verdicts against these criminal individuals and institutions.

Issued 15 November, 2014 by ITCCS Central Office, Brussels – Common Law Court Proceedings – Genocide in Canada (Part One) – 1 hr. 46 mins. – Common Law Court Proceedings – Genocide in Canada (Part Two) – 1 hr. 47 mins. – Final Court Verdict and Sentencing – 8 mins. 30 secs. – Authorizations and Endorsements of ITCCS/Kevin Annett by indigenous eyewitnesses – 10 mins. – Irene Favel, Eyewitness to the incineration of a newborn baby by a priest at Muscowegan Catholic Indian school, Saskatchewan, 1944 – Other key testimonies from our Court case against genocide in Canada

  1. The Common Law Manual​

The mills of Citizen Tribunal justice grind slowly and they grind exceedingly fine.

Transhumanist Agenda War Crimes Tribunal



  1. sooooooooooooo cooooooooooooool. u must come investigate also in Israel, much shit goes on here, and they r responsible for stuff all over the planet. great Reptile centre, u see. good luck , help humanity survive. x

This entry was posted in Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Alfred Webre: Transhumanist Agenda War Crimes Tribunal “DECONSTRUCTING THE TRANSHUMANIST AGENDA”

  1. I can add some evidence to your cache, assuming I can post a link on here that is … ?

    Being one, as in a ‘person’, that is and therefore has been ‘Robotised’ I’ve been rather preoccupied for many years in collating it you see. This is Torture and this is Murder, there should be no debate given the evidence available to prove matters – there should be immediate arrests and imprisonment for those perpetrating these crimes. Wake up, such matters are nowhere near as obscure as you imagine – oppose this tyranny, it’s afoot.

  2. lecox says:

    I was introduced to the concept of “transhumanism” through comments I read referring to Ray Kurzweil’s references to the idea. But I read that the word was actually coined by Julian Huxley in 1957 (within my lifetime!). I visited only one website on the subject – – which is apparently maintained by a group of Russian academics. I sent them a comment stating my views on their ideas, and they responded with an email asking me to “never contact us again.”

    Transhumanism is wrong-headed because it ignores the data and research that points to the fact that the human, as a being, is already immortal, has a very long experiential track, and has used many different types of bodies besides biological ones, including “robot” bodies, “doll” bodies, and “light” bodies. The problem with re-creating a human-like robot body that could last for a very long time is that we might not be very good at controlling what being ends up running such a body.

    If a better sense of continuum is what is sought after, then a much better target would be the various mechanisms of forgetting, including those that have been forced on us from time to time by societies (mostly biological ones) that were afraid of what long-term memory would do to them, as they have been so fond of pulling dirty tricks on populations.

    But I think the driving force behind the idea is really anti-human.

    I personally would not support or participate in a tribunal, as I think that’s the wrong way to handle this problem. Yes, we do need deeper investigation into the people pushing this subject. But what we need more is to arm individuals who still prefer to be honest and believe in themselves with better tools and higher abilities so they can form their own groups and organizations that can essentially take over from the materialists and begin to carry this planet into a different type of future rather than some recycled version of the past.

  3. WJ says:

    With respect to all, a court or tribunal is a venue that must have a neutral appearance at all times. It cannot afford a perception of bias or prejudice. It is therefore inconceivable that a victim or prosecutor would be allowed to sit in judgment. You cannot sit in your own cause. It has nothing to do with the integrity of the person but all to do with the integrity of the tribunal. The tribunal could allow however Mr Annett to act as prosecutor, but not as a judge. To appoint him as a judge would destroy the integrity of the court. The verdict of the court would be held prejudiced and the outcome would be of no effect by operation of law.

    In regards to a jury trial, it goes without saying that jurors are in fact the judges since they adjudge the evidence presented against the defendant. Of course a proper hearing requires an arbitrator/president/judge to ensure that the hearing progresses in an orderly manner. Also to ensure that plaintiff and defendent are afforded equal opportunity to present their case. Justice should not be subject to any budgets. Personally I believe that jurors would happily provide their time freely today and bring the criminals to justice. So many crimes against humanity have been exposed of late and so much proof is now readily available. It is now time to bring all perpetrators to justice. Bbut let us do it right and according to our common law for otherwise we only feed social media and go nowhere in a hurry.

  4. Ian MacLeod says:

    If people want to investigate something, why not THIS? :
    Deaths connected to the Obama White House

    • Jean says:

      I think I’ve published this in the past – horrendous – and there are probably many people who haven’t seen it, so I thank you 😉 Hugs, ~Jean

  5. WJ says:

    I believe it to be gross error of judgment to appoint Kevin Annett as a judge to the bench of the War Crime Tribunal. It would totally destroy the image and respect for the Tribunal. It surely could not be argued that Kevin Annett would not be prejudiced following his public statements. His appointment would make a mockery of any judicial decision of the court. A court must at all times have the public appearance of an independent tribunal. Personally I believe that trial ought to be by jury randomly picked to avoid potential bias.

    It surprises me that the court is not planning to obtain a jury verdict in line with our inviolable birthright codified under Magna Carta. I had envisaged that any ‘common’ law court would at all times uphold the Magna Carta. Is the Magna Carta not truly our common law? Even international law, the UN Charter, was based on the Magna Carta. Only a jury trial, in my opinion, would afford credibility to any verdict of the War Crime Tribunal.

    • Jean says:

      Alfred Webre responds:

      Hi! Thank you for your comments

      1. Citizen Tribunal of Conscience- In Citizen Tribunals, the trier of fact and of law is often the panel of Citizen Judges, who also serve as jurors as there are no state budgets supporting Citizen Tribunals as the Tribunal of state.

      2. The defendants in the case of this Tribunal are likely to be, by the evidence so far, institutions such as the NSA that are in fact supporting a genocidal Transhumanist Agenda to robotize humans. To the contrary, it is courageous servants of the public interest like former MP Laurent Louis, Kevin Annett (himself victimized by the Transhumanist Agenda for 20 years) that are the ideal Citizens for such a Tribunal as they understand the perpetrators’ depravities deeply

      Alfred 😉

      • Ian MacLeod says:

        From all I’ve heard from and about Kevin, he’d bend over backwards to make CERTAIN he’s fair and as objective as possible for ANYONE. He knows too well that an obvious bias against a suspect being tried could only benefit by his or anyone else’s obvious prejudice against the person on trial. For whatever it’s worth, I’d certainly trust him to make SURE of any evidence involved in the trials! There’s no suc thing as a totally unbiased juror, because the charges alone, even if a juror knows nothing about the accused, is bound to cause some reaction and the suspect is the obvious target. Kevin is certainly too intelligent to become a rabid maniac slavering for a conviction and a death sentence! Even if he felt that way, I’m certain he’d hold himself to reason and balance in his actions.


        • Jean says:

          I’m in agreement with you on this, Ian. I can’t imagine someone who would be more fair than Kevin. All his work and his efforts would be quickly lost if he weren’t . . . Hugs, ~Jean

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s