Emily Windsor-Cragg: My Claim to the UK Crown & Throne

It has taken me a very long time to set up Emily Windsor-Cragg’s statement here on my blog, but as I worked my way through it, I came to realize it offers us much information that we may have been missing regarding our true history. I hope you will all make the effort to fill yourself in on any knowledge missing from your background .  . . My thanks to Emily and her efforts on behalf of humanity. ~J


MY CLAIM TO THE UK CROWN & THRONE [for the reason] :

Indictment of HRM Queen Elizabeth II for Treason





  1. June 2, 1953, Coronation Vows:  “REIGN” VS. “RULE”
  2. Defaults in ROYAL COVENANT OBLIGATIONS as if nonexistent.
  3. Adding Efforts to Confuse the Public, a political strategy for world dominance
  4. Looking Away, “NOT-SEE”ing EU-HEGEMONY as Predation on Peoples.

–Pedophilia, Human-trafficking & Serial Wars, ALL in fact “just bidness,” no one accountable for harm.
–Debt & Class Bankruptcies, Bank Usury and investment fraud are running rampant, uncorrected.
–Wars for profits & prophets occur for PC-population reduction en masse, genocide & omnicide at work.             .
–Radiological Contamination. The Crown is a primary purveyor, processor & marketing agency for reactive and depleted uranium used in fission reactors and armaments in the world.

  1. LAWS of Marriage and Bloodline.
  2. Tavistock Institute’s Goal to OVERRULE Morality & Civil Ethics.
  3. UNESCO’s Common Core Sex Ed Curricula
  4. Parties of the First Part, in the Royal Succession.
  5. 9.    Looking to a Future to Live In.

June 2, 1953, Queen’s Coronation Vows:  “REIGN” VS. “RULE”

Transcript of the original Coronation video, herein is the dialogue between the Queen and officials of the Church of England at Her Majesty’s Coronation.

. . .  dedicating herself before God, to the service of her subjects.”

“Madam, is Your Majesty willing to take the Oath?”

[HRM states] : “I am willing.”

“Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and northern Ireland–Canada, Australia, New Zealand, . . . according to their respective laws and customs?”

[HRM states] : “I solemnly promise so to do.”

“Will you to your power, cause Law and Justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgments?”

[HRM states] : “I will.”

“Will you, to the utmost of your power, maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the gospel?  “Will you to the utmost of your power, maintain in the United Kingdom, the Protestant Reformed religion established by law? “Will you maintain and preserve invoil­able, the settlement of the Church of England–and the doctrine, worship, discipline and government thereof, as by Law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and of the churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?”

[HRM states] : “All this I promise to do.”

. . . [HRM states] : “The things which I have herebefore promised, I will perform and keep, so help me God.”


In a Constitutional Monarchy, it is Members of Parliament who Rule by Law (legislation of Law and Statute Codes) while the Sovereign reigns. The Monarch serves a function similar to checks-and-balances in the United States Constitu­tion. So Parliament is charged with crafting statutes, once the founda­tional Laws for the country are in place. It is fitting under such a Constitutional Monarchy for the King or Queen to operate by powers listed below.

Executive Power of the Queen or King of Britain:

  • The power to choose and dismiss a prime minister.
  • The power to dismiss ministers and the government, dissolve parliament and call for new elections.
  • The power to enact laws and/or veto legislation passed by Parliament.
  • The power to issue proclamations with Parliament’s consent.
  • The power to “exercise Crown prerogatives,” including declaration of war and emergency.
  • The right to read confidential government documents and intell reports, to advise and to warn.
  • The power to elevate or exile individuals; pardon convicted felons, grant and bestow titles and honors, where she herself is immune from accusations of conflict of interest. This is a debatable issue due to the fact the Royal Family retenue reflect back on the Monarch’s character; and there have been many unscrupulous, perfidious, deceitful Monarchs in our history to date.


As articulated in Annual Financial Reports of Buckingham Palace, there is no correspondence or similarity between “Her Majesty’s Powers” and the actual carrying out of functions she routinely performs. The Queen serves as corporatist mascot of State and only includes ceremonial aspects of leadership–no judgments or problem-solving or decision-making is included, as recorded in the following activities in the 2011 Annual Report:

  • Undertaking constitutional duties, for example the State Opening of Parliament, regular audiences with the Prime Minister, meetings of the Privy Council, giving Royal Assent to legislation and approving many appointments;
  • Fulfilling constitutional responsibilities in relation to the Scottish Parliament and, where appropriate, the Welsh and Northern Ireland Assemblies;
  • Carrying out State and Royal Visits overseas and receiving State and Official visitors to the United Kingdom;
  • Receiving credentials from foreign Heads of Mission; and presenting honours at Investitures. In addition, the role of The Queen, supported by members of the Royal Family, extends more widely than these formal duties and includes:
    • Providing a focus for national identity, unity and pride (for example on Remembrance Sunday and at times of national celebration or tragedy);
    • Providing a sense of stability and continuity (for example by participating in traditional ceremonies such as Trooping the Colour);
    • Recognising success, achievement and excellence (for example through visits, receptions and awards); and
    • Contributing through public service and the voluntary sector to the life of the nation;
    • In this area The Queen is particularly supported by the work of other members of the Royal Family (e.g. The Prince’s Trust and The Duke of Edinburgh’s Award Scheme).

CITATION: 2011 Annual Financial Report of Buckingham Palace, page Conflicting Obligations Renders the Monarch a puppet by choice



Today the Monarch serves as a consumer and not as “Mediator” in conflicts of interest and disputes between Common and Statute Laws. She presides in name only, distancing herself from making checks-and-balances that moral leadership demands, that the word “REIGN” implies. She doesn’t even speak up about or speak TO conditions of slavery, war and want. But she’s the head of the Church, so that its Bishops don’t speak up either; Bishops of the Church of England are also silenced, especially with Tavistock across the street from the Archbishop of Canterbury’s office.

Whereas she vowed to protect and support the Church of England, She sits quietly and allows Tavistock, which her Grandfather King George V (along with Kaiser Wilhelm) helped establish, to degrade, discount, demean and dishonor Britain’s COVENANT epito­mized by the Stone of Scone under St. Edward the Confessor’s Chair; but also British culture and Law, in direct violation of her Coronation Vows.

 Queen Elizabeth signed SIX Lisbon Treaties that gave away her sovereign pre­roga­tives–practically behind closed doors and without the consent of the British peoples–to EU management by distant, impersonal entities, unelected and unrepre­sentative of Britain. She has reduced herself to the status of CEO of the United Kingdom Corporation.


Technically, there is nothing “Royal” about Royals who join the EU, because the EU rules, but no Monarch has the authority to combat conflicts of interest caused by EU legislation.  And so, the Royal Monarchs all sit together as peers who all still pretend to be sovereigns having dominion even over themselves, while they are all yet subject to EU top-down legislation.

Britain’s Queen serves as hostess and greeter, or she may send in a look-alike [doppel­ganger] lady-in-waiting. Effectively, she is in the Hospitality Business, she entertains for the State and she reads “My Government’s Goals” without challenge or question.

CITY OF LONDON; INNS OF COURT; THE BAR.–She stands silent and servile before the Inns of Court that run dual and twisted legalist systems combining common law and Maritime statutes without regard to effects on working classes.



Her Majesty’s relationship to the Vatican, despite cautions embedded in the 1689 Bill of Rights that imbue a “separate but equal” status upon Her Majesty and the Pope,  ignores the reality of infiltrating practices of Jesuit and Occult chivalric Orders into UK society; namely, Order of the Garter, of the Thistle, of the Bath and of St. John the Divine; Knights of Malta, and the Committee of 300, among others. Even if the present Pope is an honorable man, the next one could be another problem-identity because Papism falls into factions—Christian, Satanic and Luciferian.  And everybody knows : Religion is a problem requiring clarity, facilitation skills and wisdom coming from Leadership for Peace to obtain.


Immigration. – Her Majesty and the entire Royal family distances themselves from effects of Treaties she has signed that abrogate and annul sovereign human rights and economic parity of British citizenry in favor of an EU invasion of foreign minorities that literally threaten to take over the UK, namely, the same Quranic imams and scholars that historically by dogma and doctrine have always sought to conquer Western society.

And again, due to confusion over the trafficking of “persons” between UN, EU, Quranic, Talmudic limits [against women, children and dissidents] and [faith and thinking] boundaries–which Her Majesty left in place and never speaks to–her children are found to be in just one scandal after another for vicarious profits.  Mainstream media endlessly discuss and gossip about prurient escapades. The fact is, Prince Andrew is single, he can “date” whoever he wants post-puberty, and “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned;” so even when no crime has technically been committed, there is staged uproar in the media.


Added Effort to Confuse:  the Political Strategy of Dominance


Lie Number One is that the United Kingdom has only been in existence since 1603, that it has no basis in religion at all, nor does the Anglican Communion have coherent history, back to Scotland, back to Irish Kings before the Roman invasion. This is not true, but the history is hidden.

Lie Number Two 
is that Roman-Maritime-Laws of the Sea and Laws of the Admiralty including the UCCode are just as legal and reasonable in utility for humane relations In Trust situations as they are for people in relations where there is no Trust at work in relationship. This is false.  Common Laws are for people who know each other.

Lie Number Three 
is that it’s reasonable to set the two sets of Law against each other in the Bar Associations, without every having articulated them as discrete sets or pay any attention to the Chaos that is created in relationships by Maritime Law.

Lie Number Four 
is that citizens of a nation can be treated as cattle who are not privvy to two distinct sets of Law and their contents as to who has dominion or sovereign status.

Lie Number Five 
is that Law ought to be so voluminous and complicated a nation best not try to teach its stipulations to citizens directly; but rather require a profession of legal experts who profiteer on legal predicaments they can create by virtue of their special knowledge.  This is outrageous upon the working people.

Lie Number Six 
is the “Bar Association” [Inns of Court] definition of a “person” engaging one of the “experts” is “imbecile,” even though barristers and lawyers themselves cannot command all sets of legalisms.  The costs of Maritime Courts are too burdensome to bear.

Lie Number Seven 
is that a nation can live by Liberty and Dominion, that sets a profession of Barristers, Lawyers and Legislators against its own peoples.

Lie Number Eight 
is that a “reigning” Monarch has no responsibility to notice any of this treachery, who presumes no responsibility for serving as check-and-balance to restore the boundaries between Law of the Land [Trust and in occupancy] versus Law of the Sea.


Common Law Justice was established among the bloodlines of Israel Kings by Moses over Mount Horeb after the Exodus from Egyptian slavery, and the Kingdom’s operations guaranteed that the outcomes of Law would be win/win or pay/win in disputes and con­flicts for and among the peoples themselves; Elitism was not permitted and the King had to abide by the same Laws as everyone else. Common Law, one version of Laws of the Land, have always had the purpose of protecting and restoring balance and justice of citizens and travelers who reside and live and work on the land in relationship in a nation and culture of people, in mutuality. (Eg, the Irish Brehon system is another legal system In Trust.) Common Law is based on truth telling among people who already know each other.

But what about the Covenant for the Kingdom in Britain? How did this Royal Family come about it? Did they keep it, lose it, or throw it away?  “Covenant” is not even mentioned in the entire Buckingham Palace web-site.  What is the truth about the Lia Fail, the Stone of Destiny, the Coronation Stone?

It is here:


Written history going back 2600+ years has been with us all along.  In the Jewish Diaspora, the tribal line of Judah set up residence in Ireland.  Britain’s Monarchy goes back to Tara Ireland beginning in 583BC, to settlements where Tribes of Dan and Judah saw the arrival of the Prophet Jeremiah after Jerusalem’s sacking, with King Zephaniah’s two daughters, Teah Tephi and Sophia, among Celts and Gaels. Holy-Law-abiding culture according to Holy Law and Brehon Law continued until St. Patrick converted Ireland to Christianity, and the Royal bloodline moved to Iona Scotland, where and when King Fergus moved the Monarchy and its Lia Fail, about 500AD. And then, when Edward I conquered Scotland he moved the Lia Fail from Scotland to London in 1296AD. I mean, if the Crown is Monarchy over the entire British Isles, then this is its true history–not the current version which places the beginning of the Monarchy in 1603AD.

[See Hardinge, Leslie, The Celtic Church in Britain, New York, Teach Services Inc., 2005;   Davidy, Yair, THE TRIBES, the Israelite Origins of Western Peoples, 2009(?), Hebron, Israel: Russell-Davis Publishers;  Hisslop, Bishop Alexander, The Two Babylons, Proof that Roman Catholic Beliefs Came from Pagan Babylonian Religion, Ontario, CA:  Chick Publications;  Windsor-Cragg, E. Emily, Come Let Us Make Man In Our Image, Charleston, SC: Amazon.com Publishers, 2014; Windsor-Cragg, Emily E., Restoring the Kingdom of God to Sovereignty, San Bernardino CA: Amazon.com, Aug 2014.]

Six hundred years after the Kingdom of David came to Britain, Jesus Christ established the more Subtle Ethics of the Irish Brehon system of Law–in Judea–when he edited His Father’s Holy Mosaic Law to include personal applications and inten­tions–much as the Irish Brehon System of Law was a personal legal ‘relationships’ system characterized by mutual trust and reliability. Moreover, with the Sacrifice of that innocent dissident Yeshua ben Joseph in 33CE, the point was made that executing the innocent has no reason and no purpose in creating Good and Just outcomes for people. So Jesus in His Teachings omitted capital punishment, just as in Irish Brehon Law there was no capital punishment provision where human relations are in civil conflict.  See Appendix 2, The Beatitudes and Teachings of Yeshua ben Joseph, no cruelty at all.

Jesus had taught, “Give therefore what is Caesar’s to Caesar; but what is God’s to God,” THE OPERATING PRINCIPLE of the Christ–NOT subjection as a vassal-chattel to a ROMAN-STYLED Corporate STATE by impersonal rules, policies, procedures and mechanistic practices as in Maritime Law, which is impersonal and in which there is no mutual expectation of trust.

B-U-T– How did impersonal Maritime Law (favoring Elites) overtake Common Laws OF THE LAND in the British Isles?

Here is a Legalist thumbnail history: HOW Maritime Law WON OVER Common Law in Britain

 In the 16th and 17th century a handful of simultaneous elements changed Law from the customary application of Common Laws of the Land for the peoples of the Land, to Laws of the Sea, of Commerce, of corporate statutes. In the 16th century the Spanish Armada dominated the globe with conquest, and tt the time, Spain was the protector of Rome and Vatican, Spain and Italy serving as single military-political unit.

One of the Popes in a Papal Bull (I believe it was “Innocent”) declared the Vatican owned every soul on earth. Nobody countered that claim (by Annunaki Law). Henry VIII adopted the Protestant Faith to get free of that statement, and he formed the church of England to be able to say, “No, they don’t own us.”

Then with the founding of MI5-intell by John Dee with collaboration of the Jesus Society of Jesuits, King James II-VI ordered the British Navy to conquer Spain at sea in battle with the Spanish Armada and destroy Spain’s dominance, which he accomplished. Since that occurred at sea under Laws of the Sea, High Maritime Laws obtained, and thereafter, Maritime Laws become dominant over England as well, but Spain lost all claims and rights that they had won, under Laws of the Sea.

England could now say, “We’ve now taken away the ownership of humanity from the Vatican, and we are now ruling the world because we are in command of the Vatican by monetary dictates and commerce Law.” Queen Victoria continued in the tradition of exercising sovereign rights of her nation, but forever-after, under a pretext that Common Laws were still sovereign over the Land, which was no longer the case.

Today like the US, the United Kingdom is not a common-laws-of-the-land Covenant Nation; it’s a “Dinseyworld” of British Commerce and Statute Codes, and Her Majesty is merely its CEO. She threw out her Crown when she signed SIX Lisbon Treaties.  These facts need to be known. Queen Elizabeth II is not a reigning Monarch. She is a corporate mascot of the United Kingdom Corporation.   [Personal communication from historian Brian Zadonne.]



Tyranny of Predatory Leadership arising out of Confusion between Maritime Statutes and Common Laws

British Monarchs have been silently presiding with assent to the pres­ence of FOUR stupendous black-hole quagmires, never speaking to their causes, effects, outcomes or reasons.


PEDOPHILIA AND “PERSON”-TRAFFICKING–“Just business-as-usual” in Maritime Law, Quranic & Talmudic Dogma, Doctrine and Rules–especially in UN-UNESCO Education Policy. See Appendix 3.

Elite control over politics and legislation is guaranteed by the blackmail of MPs  for “procuring” porn and witnessing or participating in child-abuse and slavery; but in Maritime Law there are no penalties for subjective harm arising from “procuring a person as a service,” except cash money, because Maritime Law is based on indifferent and impersonal social norms, i.e, UN guidelines. And so, scandals arise and fall, but prose­cutions for child-trafficking, snuff porn, slavery and murder for body parts are few and far between. At the same time, prosecutions for truly victim-free crimes (like “smoking weed,” selling raw milk, growing a garden in a “wrong” place or installing rain-catch barrels) create harmless felons for prison-industries that profit judges and stockholders of prisons and social services. “Revenue-enhancement” is now the primary goal of agencies charged with peace and public safety right under the nose of the Queen, who maintains her schedule of visits to the poor but never addresses their problems or terrors. Royal Visits always comprise shallow chit-chat, as a matter of policy.

DEBT AND CLASS BANKRUPTCIES arise out of Bank Usury, fiat-debt financing and bank fraud, ponzi schemes and collections scams characteristic of the fiat-debt banking combine whose runaway inflation has impoverished every worker in the world.

SERIAL WARS FOR PROFITS & PROPHETS occur because defense contractors and paid mercenary terrorists are free from Legal Accountability under Maritime Law and covert paramilitary operations.

RADIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION BY DEPLETED URANIUM. — Depleted uranium trade–THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THIS by a Royal Monarch who Boo-hoos  about ecological balance. Such a level of hypocrisy overlooking four elephants in the room, belies any claim of leadership skill.



Britain is now a vassal region of a top-down dictatorial hegemony that operates from Laws of the Sea in Belgium. It’s primarily a banker-dominated cabal in control by covert intel (Mossad-led) and Masonic blackmail, assassination and psych-ops worldwide. This means, Common Laws against Harm, Deceit, Fraud, Waste and Abuse are inoperative because “Business As Usual” takes precedent over Justice, and violence is profitable.

Therefore, the teachings of Quran and Talmud with respect to abuse of women and children, sexual slavery, sex and snuff porn, female genital mutiltion and all the terrors of Islam; plus a caste system of “Insiders” versus “Outsiders” as promulgated in the Talmud; plus wholesale slaughter of innocents staged by “terrorist mercenaries” is permitted by Radicals under the “Equality of Religion” statute of the UN and EU Charters, all of which  ARE “LEGAL” TO THE EXTENT THESE PRACTICES CANNOT AND WILL NOT BE PROSECUTED by Courts of the Land. Indeed, terrorism is staged to keep all people intimidated and in subjection. Fie on this!

Never mind, corporate hegemony is killing the planet with chemicals, contracted diseases and contaminated vaccines, and blaming the working people all the while.

Totalitarianism and terrorism have come to Britain, and there is no reason for these to ever cease, because blackmail, assassinations and trafficking against dissenters can keep a Legalized Crime Syndicate in place for generations until and unless populations are energized or Elites get lazy and let go of their power by leaving the world stage.

This Queen Elizabeth II and her branch of the Line of David let it happen, and they have been in silent collusion the whole time, whereas my father said no, not this. Not more war, because he had spent four years on the ground in World War I. No, not more financial manipulations; he was pro-labor. And I’m here to say to you, Elites are just letting it happen unless this Throne is turned over to a bloodline legal heir who serves the people, to correct these matters, with an education, training, God’s Grace and Strong Arm [whatever that means] of Almighty Sovereign YHVH, who with the Patriarch Jacob, forged this Covenant so long ago.

Vastly rich people didn’t just let this happen; they also presided over the gagging of the media; the concealment of damage their own corporations cause by marketing and distributing contaminated medical pharmaceuticals, depleted uranium products, insecticides and genetically modified sterile seeds; and oil rig accidents uncorrected that BP Oil Co weaseled out of repairing). Today Elites are planet-killers, loose cannons ecologically, who call on the rest of us in this world to tighten our belts and take the blame.  But what’s happening to us, the English-speaking peoples of the world, hides behind a curtain of secrecy, here: [ http://www.holyconservancy.org/protocol.pdf ] get your complete “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” Illuminist Playbook for Globalist New World Order hegemony, 46 pages, two-up, print landscape orientation. And Her Majesty either doesn’t know anything about it or she’s in on it!

I figure, we only have weeks or months at best to stop the bankster-war parties and their psychopathic hierarchy from starting another world war to comply with Albert Pike’s confabulated prophecies of THREE WORLD WARS. Leaders who consent to this degradation of civil society must be taken aside and given a broom and a hovel, in exchange for their heinous acts. [ WORLD WAR 3. THE FINAL SOCIAL CATACLYSM.

Wikipedia entry on Albert Pike

 Non-linear warfare is waged against us all by confusing what we can know. This is a deplor­able way to keep Peoples away from knowing anything true or not true.

Journalists in the West are forbidden to tell what are true outcomes and not true (hoaxed events).  But Elites either don’t care or they are sanctioning this perfidious behavior.

I believe Her Majesty ought to be explaining to us, >why< she has not called attention to the Illuminati plans to control, dominate and >clear< this planet of its peoples.



[I made a copy of the Mosaic Law, which every King’s offspring in the Kingdom of David  is required to make, and it is here:  http://www.holyconservancy.org/2728.htm.]

English Bill of Rights, 1689, An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown. Re-established the monarchy as a result of the Glorious Revolution. Avalon Project.

[ http://billofrightsinstitute.org/resources/educator-resources/americapedia/americapedia-documents/english-bill-of-rights/ ]

Act of Settlement, June 12, 1701, Great Britain Act of Parliament that, since 1701, has regulated the succession to the throne of Great Britain.

[ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/536314/Act-of-Settlement ]

Royal Marriage Act of 1772, The Regency Collection | Georgian Marriages.

[ http://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Geo3/12/11/contents ]

His Majesty’s Declaration of Abdication Act, 1936, recognised and ratified the abdication of King Edward VIII and passed succession to his brother Prince Albert, Duke of York (who subsequently became King George VI). The act also excluded any possible future descendants of Edward from the line of succession.

[ http://www.heraldica.org/faqs/abdicate.html ]

On one hand, Royals claim to follow the Christian practices of Marriage and legitimate family, but on the other hand, Christian Ethics are now substantially missing from UK State policies and party politics.  SEE below.



QUOTE:   The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the “breaking point” of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese.

Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock’s pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of “controlling” humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.

Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nev­ertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a “refugee”, the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS pro­gram, as well as the CIA always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.

Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they watched the “guinea pigs” reacting under “controlled laboratory condi­tions”. All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal—to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control. The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to “establish new rituals of personal interaction”, that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family. UNQUOTE

The very idea that Her Majesty hasn’t been aware of the deleterious effects of Tavistock propaganda upon the moral and ethical foundation of Britain is simply beyond cognition.  She can’t be that stupefied; neither can she be that blind to the reality that Tavistock’s mandate is to undo “Christian” Ethics en toto; but here Elizabeth II is, Head of the Church of England!



“Never mind, morality.”

QUOTE TEACHINGS:  The Common Core curriculum encourages parents to be supportive and open-minded to gender identity and sexual orientation, and discourages them from enforcing traditional gender identities: “Confusion about these issues and fear of homosexuality (homophobia) has caused many parents and other adults to limit how girls and boys express themselves.”

One curriculum asks parents to refrain from teaching children about morality, as there are no right and wrong values, while another model curriculum asks parents to address contradictions in “religious approaches and rights based approaches.”

Perhaps the most disturbing of the curricula asks parents to foster early sexual development by encouraging children to “experience genital pleasure” from birth until age 2 and by age 3, to encourage “sex play.”  The report also heavily promotes the encourage­ment of abortion and lists the International Planned Parenthood Federation and other abortion advocacy organizations as references.

Her Majesty’s VOW, remember ? “Will you, to the utmost of your power, maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the gospel?”  Or did we all forget that the limits and boundaries on sexual behavior have the outcome of protecting bloodline families, because Christianity is “about” maintaining  bloodline families from generation-to-generation and from millennium-to-millennium . . . ?  And so, in the effort to protect family vows and covenants, we do abridge and edit our sexual behavior voluntarily.  But has Her Majesty demanded that Britain’s Christians be allowed to opt out from the teachings of profligate sexual behavior in the face of Common Core Curricula contradictions?  Not a word.

Moreover, Common Core teachings justify pedophilia (and resultant blackmail) coerce certain adults who buy in to fail and fall in their reputations.  Indeed!  It is very easy to blackmail an Elite who has opted in to profligate sexual practices.  This is how totali­tarianism gets its foothold, its control over individuals.

SEE [ http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/

631-unesco-report-sex-guidelines-for-kids-from-birth ]




Picture is of Father and Grandson Edward at age 22

The Complainant is daughter of King Edward VIII who became the Duke of Windsor when he fled and then was exiled from his home country—who ruled for only ten months among his enemies.  Her books at Amazon cover Earth’s ET history, History of Hierarchy and Law http://www.amazon.com/dp/1492359750, Restoring the Kingdom of God to Sovereignty, http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451529155/ , and other volumes of Community Development, Conspiracies and Crafts, 17 in all.

Emily Elizabeth Windsor-Cragg, born in 1944 in Edward’s 50th year, is educated and trained in Group Problem Solving, Conflict and Dispute Analysis and IT.  See her Profile at LinkedIN.com.

Five grown children, Heather Anne, Andrew, Dayna Jeanette, Edward Scott and Steven Walter (four with university degrees) command skills in IT, Hospitality, Permaculture, Military Security and Logistics. No one in our family has ever been charged with a crime. To date, only one was divorced and remarried.  Nine grandchildren are all healthy and somewhat gifted.

What’s going on with the Windsor family RE: SUCCESSION

Edward violated the 1772 Marriage Act by marrying a divorcee who was [secretly] a double Mi-5 agent in the employ of King George V during WWI serving as intermediary between the King and his German cousin Kaiser Wilhelm, as well as with the eldest son, Adolph.

As a result Parliament [knowing the secret] passed an Act that removed Edward’s Royal privileges and all of any issue/children he may have ever had. There’s reason to believe from “a King’s Story,” that if Edward ever found out who and what Wallis was, it never seemed to show up in his writings, and his efforts to regain the throne were pitiful and few and consisted of some negotiations with Germans, who were in charge anyway.

Now. Charles has violated the exact same act, and his present wife has Catholic connections, also forbidden by Law. So, it appears to me that the Royals can do one of two things: by lawful precedent, cut Charles and his kids off (William, Harry and George) as happened before to Edward;

OR, by rescinding the special Act against Edward, place Charles back in the line of succession except for one matter: rescinding that Act would restore me and my bloodline as members (albeit illegitimate] of the family, the bloodline of which I live in God’s sight by blood.

OR,  “FORMAL REQUEST: I request Parliament to revoke the Abdication Act and so amend the Act of Settlement (1700) as to restore me and my bloodline as members and, after due deliberation, to elevate me to the UK Throne as Monarch with the intention to resolve and thrive–not further confound and penalize–the United Kingdom as a nation and group of compatible cultures.”


Not having access to samples of my parents’ blood, I have not yet undergone the sort of DNA test that establish parenthood. But of course, I will do so when enabled to do so.

PORPHYRIA, disease of the Bloodline. People ask me how I know I’m Edward Duke of Windsor’s daughter. I have the congenital blood condition called Porphyria, the symptoms of which are noted in suffered by Elizabeth the First’s reign; which sidelined King George the Third; also notable carriers both George V and his wife, May Teck, both of whom were direct descendants of Geo III, were my grandparents on my father’s side. I have it, my son Andrew and his daughter Jessica have a variant of it. No way that disease arises out of the blue; it’s by genetics alone.  I’m in the bloodline, sidelined, scape­goated and disinherited through no fault of my own. And She, Her Majesty, has lost her moorings … insofar as Justice with Mercy, to the Covenant with God. … No I do not sacrifice babies … to keep going. No need to harm anyone.



When I found out Edward Duke of Windsor was my father and sire (I was in my fifties), I called out to God in prayer, “Why on earth did you let this go until I’m an old woman?!”

And He said to me, “I waited until I could see that corruption was irreversible.”

And so I asked, “So what do you want me to do about it?

And He said, “You’re going to have run with the ball, because your father and his relatives dropped the ball.”

And I replied, “What?! I’m not prepared to do anything like that.”

And He said, “You don’t have to do anything but listen to My Words and take them down, daily.

And so I started writing down what I hear Him “think” to me. I never heard audible words, just meanings in silence. I have written TWELVE books of dictation since I “retired” in 2001: Lia Fail Covenant, Orientation to Hierarchy, Use of Space, Nutrition, Royal Style, Speeches & Topics, plus the six books I published:  Let your No Mean No, Come Take Life’s Water Free, Civil Life in Galactic History, Come Let Us Make Man in our Image, Restoration of the Kingdom of God, and Path to Orion yes we Can.

Before that, my Masters thesis consisted of, “Effect of television on children,” “Conflict Analysis and resolution,” and “Large Group Problem Facilitation & Resolution,” Inter­ac­tive Management system to debrief a large crowd of their true experiences in hierarchy.

My Source has kept me busy at work, and of course, people back away from me for speaking of “God” in any context including the instant Church.

I discovered My father Edward’s problem was that he was never educated, mentored, apprenticed or guided into the role of King. He was left to founder because his father King George V sensed the young Prince wasn’t going to go along with the Round Table Agenda, the Order of the Garter, Tavistock and Rothschild version of a worldwide political­economic order controlled top-down by rich men.

Jesus didn’t hang out with rich men, He was level-ler. Edward was pro-Labor, a level-ler of the playing field. He father was not in any case going to allow Edward to reach the Throne intact, so he waited until Edward stumbled, and the King caught him in the marriage net which the King had forbidden for twenty-odd years.

And so we have the Official Version of Wallis Simpson case which, like the JFK story, the OKC95 story, the Ruby Ridge story, the Titanic story, and the WTC 9/11 story, read like a fairy tale of helplessness, powerlessness and ignorance … because that’s what those stories have been . . . hoaxed . . . but in the atomic age.

What humans are faced with today is nothing less than annihilation of mankind for the benefit of Luciferian-ETs [Masonic Orders] who want to clear the planet for galactic commerce; bankers, defense contractors, airlines, logistics companies, social services, courts and other impersonal hierarchies that have taken human relationships down into the gutter, into filth, into Oblivion of asymmetrical war against people who never did any harm to anybody.

So, it doesn’t matter what I might want to do, unless it matters to the rest of toxic, psychopathic leadership that this world and our people should not be annihilated into extinction, enslaved into galactic tyranny, starved into submission, destroyed by contrived diseases and chemical pollutants–not to mention, bloodlines and oceans depopulated by depleted uranium toxicity which is permanent, from buried weapons of war, from aging atomic reactors, with sterile seeds and RoundUP by Monsanto killing beneficial insects and small birds and poisoning the entire living food chain.

SO, IF THE REST OF –THIS– my generation, those who were born during WWII, don’t care –or speak up– what happens to the world, to their children and grandchildren, then God says, He can just take it all down –again– as He did in Noah’s day due to genetic malformed hybrids out of scale with the ecosystem. But this time, He doesn’t have to put it back up again . . . What for? . . . And start the same sort of human ethical shambles once more? There’s no reason to permit chaos, cruelty, slavery and misery at this scale.

YHVH runs this solar cluster, tends the sun and the orbits, makes sure this planet stays safe. And there are other sectors of space that can abide with this beautiful planet in Peace with Justice; and if the people here don’t care to unseat psychopathic leaders, well, They the Cosmic Sylph Community can just move us elsewhere, and Leadership can count their days in hours and minutes.

That’s what “God YHVH” said to me, so I got really busy and took it all down … for y’all to read, consider and take to heart. After all, the Covenant with Abraham is where this Royal House began; and if the people want to take it down into Hell, well, that’s not God’s fault.

He–YHVH–doesn’t have to do all this work to provide souls’ environment, again for deceit and ruin to be practically the only outcome.  –Emily Windsor-Cragg

This entry was posted in Financial/economic information, Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption, Political and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Emily Windsor-Cragg: My Claim to the UK Crown & Throne

  1. WJ says:

    Further to my last posting there are numerous other issues that relate to the Crown in the UK.
    Firstly Henry VIII never had a birthright to the throne since he was a bastard, that is, he was a son born out of wedlock. He was not the King’s son. This has been scientifically proven and documentaries by the BBC have been made and shown. Then we have the interesting legal situation that followed when King James, a Catholic, was chased out of the country. England therefore was without a King . . . and without a lawful Parliament.

    History makes us believe that the English parliament then invited Mary, who was James’ younger sister and married to Dutch Willem of Orange to come to England where the Parliament elevated them to King and Queen. Mary had refused to accept to be the sole Sovereign and had insisted that her husband Willem should share the sovereignty as equal Sovereigns. Now anyone with any understanding of law understands that without a King there could not have been a Parliament. The King is an essential part of the Parliament, The King, the Lords, and the Commons make for the three Estates of Parliament.

    Sovereignty is at all times total and complete authority. You cannot abrogate or diminish from sovereignty. It is always total and complete authority. Hence it is not possible to have equal Sovereigns. The legal reality is that neither had any authority. This was always the intention. This parliament with no standing then enaccted the Act of Settlement, 1700. This act determines who should be a future king of England. We shall not deal with the illegalities of the act, but rather illustrate that the kings of England post 1700 were appointed by the English parliament. This made the parliament sovereign as creator of the king. The creator always holds sovereignty over its creations. In reality only Almighty God can appoint a temporal Sovereign as His Viceroy on Earth. This He did by covenant with David (Jeremiah Chapter 33; 20 and 21) (Proverbs Chapter 8: 25).

  2. mary says:

    this was very informative. I hope many watch this and read it. .more and more is coming together

  3. Ri-chard says:

    Don’t forget the how to enforce these claims is key to real change. Again, if The People want it, it can happen. If not, same old, same old will prevail.

  4. Bill says:

    The succession of kings from King David onward is quite well documented. What WJ says above is correct, the prodigy passes through the son – normally the firstborn, known as the rule of primogenitor.

    2 Samuel 7 16 And thine (David’s) house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.

    However what we have in the instant case is a total corruption of the system. Subsequent to the original loan to the Bank of England by the Rothschild banksters, in the 18th century, there has has been a corruption of the “ruling” class royalty sitting on the throne of the House of David. For hundreds of years even the reigning monarch cannot enter “The City” without permission of the Lord Mayor. Most of the financial activities of the world are directed or dictated from the small area of London. For the most part many people are aware of the “adulterated” blood line in the present throne holders but the “wizards” are not allowing the truth to be publisher – when it does come out it will be a stunning indictment against the ruling cabal! As a true Scot I’m looking forward to the proper man sitting on that throne!

  5. Ronnie says:

    “Not having access to samples of my parents’ blood, I have not yet undergone the sort of DNA test that establish parenthood. But of course, I will do so when enabled to do so. PORPHYRIA, disease of the Bloodline. People ask me how I know I’m Edward Duke of Windsor’s daughter. I have the congenital blood condition called Porphyria, the symptoms of which are noted in suffered by Elizabeth the First’s reign;…”

    Elizabeth I had no issue and her heir was her father’s (Henry VIII’s) oldest sister’s (Margaret) line — James VI of Scotland (Mary, Queen of Scot’s son). Elizabeth Tudor did not suffer from Porphyria. They can trace this disease possibly from Mary Queen of Scots (Margret’s granddaughter) and through her son, James VI of Scotland who became James I of England. This mutation showed up many times. This is not such a rare mutation disease and possibly 1 in 500 or 1 in 15,000 have it but most people might not even know they have it hence the rate is so unclear. The most famous British royal to have it was–King George III–who was called “Mad.” History now states George was not insane but had this disease, which can cause mental disturbances.

    This woman, if she is who she says is illegitimate and would never have any claim to anything. However, Elizabeth II would have never become Queen if we go back far enough all the way to Charles II, (grandson of James I) who had plenty of illegitimate children but no legitimate children. His heir became his brother James, who had two daughters from his first wife and after she died he remarried and had a legitimate son, named Charles. The problem was James was suspected to be Catholic and he married his second wife who was Catholic and so that won’t do!! His legitimate son was disinherited by Britain and they chose to put first Mary (William & Mary) and then Queen Ann (Mary’s sister) on the throne. Charles’s son –also named Charles–is the famous “Bonnie Prince Charlie.” His heirs were the rightful heirs to the throne of England.

    Because neither Mary or Ann had children (or survived) they had to go and dig and find a distant relative in Germany (Hanover) to give the throne to who was German, spoke no English but was Protestant. Eventually we get to Queen Victoria who was German, spoke German to her kids and who married a German. Queen Elizabeth II is not a “Windsor” but a Battenburg (changed to Mountbatten) by marriage née Sax-Coburg.”

    One of the symptoms of this disease is mental instability–need I say more! If one can claim a throne by being illegitimate the entire history of most monarchies would be unrecognized today.

    She can’t possibly prove she is the illegitimate child of her supposed father and her mother’s DNA is irrelevant.

  6. Joe says:

    “YHVH runs this solar cluster, tends the sun and the orbits, makes sure this planet stays safe.”

    Oh really? The old Hebrew Guy In the Sky hasn’t exactly done a bang-up job at it, now has he? As far as I am concerned, YVHV is the corrupt demiurge, as the Gnostics and Greeks described it. Montalk has much more detail on this complicated subject here. http://montalk.net/gnosis/171/corruption-of-the-demiurge

  7. Di, Cerrillos,NM,USA says:

    This is all drivel. Bloodlines crap. Yaweh is not who you think. England is now and has been for a long time under the control of the pirates. I have compassion for the slaves who live there and believe all this crap. It is perpetuated by ignorants like Emily. Jeez, there isn’t much time to wake up. The Mother earth doesn’t care about bloodlines, ownership or control. She will dump everyone in a great cleansing if this nonsense continues. We are at the end of a great cycle, none of this bloodline nonsense belongs in the new cycle. WAKE UP FOLKS.

  8. Kieron says:

    Some of this rings true, in that the land and the people suffer until the true ruler is restored to the throne. That’s a recurring motif in mythology. And if we had the Brehon Laws in place, none of the garbage happening today would have gotten a foothold to lead us to this dire point in time.

    However, I cannot countenance the following:

    “… unless this Throne is turned over to a bloodline legal heir who serves the people, to correct these matters, with an education, training, God’s Grace and Strong Arm [whatever that means] of Almighty Sovereign YHVH, who with the Patriarch Jacob, forged this Covenant so long ago.”

    Uh, no, sorry, I think not. “YHVH” Jehovah the jealous god speaks to you? “He” advises following covenants of Hebrew Patriarchs? Jehovah, the “deity” who wants us to mutilate infant boys in the rite known as circumcision, as a covenant with “Him”?? Sorry, you strain my credulity to the breaking point. You’ll have to try harder than that to obtain my consent. Others may swiftly sign over their consent, but not I. I do NOT consent to anything to do with “Jehovah.”

  9. new kid in town says:

    Don`t know much about Alfred Webre.
    If Alfred Webre is somehow cooperating with Tanaath (partner in crime with Drake on COSMIC VOICE) or give people like them any promotion I do not expect any credibility from him.
    What game is he playing?

    The Future of the Matrix -Dr. Alfred Webre & Drake Bailey – The Future of The Matrix

    Have a nice day!

  10. Pingback: Emily Windsor-Cragg: My Claim to the UK Crown & Throne | Boxnews.us - Latest News

  11. WJ says:

    In very simple terms she violated her coronation contract, and like all contracts it was instantly void upon the first breach. A clear example of such breach of contract is allowing bankers to practice usury, that is asking for more than what the lent (interest). Usury is strictly prohibited under the Bible and Koran. It is against the laws of God the queen promised to uphold as a condition of the contract. The coronation is not just an oath but a written document/book which the queen had to sign in 1953.

    In law that means the queen abdicates with her Executive Ministers of State (aka government) and the people are absolved from obedience to same. Now legally it is impossible for a queen to be the Sovereign in the first place. The birthright to the throne only extends from male heir to male heir pursuant to the contract with the House of David. A queen can at best only be the spouse to a king.

  12. ElveTwelve says:

    Long Live Queen Emily, hurray hurray hurray! i do consent!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.