Conclusive Evidence the 9/11 Planes were NOT REAL

Published on Jun 1, 2013
Thanks to T.

Were there really passengers on any flights associated with the plot of 9/11? Dean T. Hartwell, author of “Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11” makes a convincing argument that there were none. He says that two planes (United 175 and 93) actually flew to Ohio that day without anyone on board, to be hidden from the public that thought these planes had crashed as part of a “terrorist” plot. All reasonable evidence points toward a hoax.…

Planes Without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11
This is the second edition of Planes without Passengers: the Faked Hijackings of 9/11. It is written by one of the leading researchers on the issue of planes and passengers, Dean T. Hartwell. This edition confirms the conclusion of the first book that no hijackings took place that day and puts together a more complete theory: Only two planes of the four planes alleged to be connected with the 9/11 plot actually flew on that day. And the passengers were not people who paid a ticket to go from one place to another. They were instead agents connected to the plot who were chosen to help cover up the crime. This theory is based primarily upon two facts: (1) the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), which maintains information on all commercial flights in the United States, in its original form stated clearly that while United 175 and United 93 were scheduled and flew, American 11 and American 77 did not and (2) ACARS, a system much like electronic mail and GPS, shows that United 175 and United 93 were flying over the Midwestern part of the United
States long after their supposed “crashes” on the east coast. Agents pretending to be passengers were seen at the Cleveland Hopkins Airport late that morning. They walked toward A NASA building to make calls to the media to straighten out an impression many had that the Internet reported that United 93 had landed in Cleveland. History should not be a lie agreed upon by the media, the politicians and others of influence. History must give us the most likely events based on the available information. This book aims to be a part of history we may not want to believe, but we should believe because it weighs the facts in an objective manner.…

“When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

This entry was posted in Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Conclusive Evidence the 9/11 Planes were NOT REAL

  1. says:

    Rare Amateur 9 11 Footage with audio NOT SHOW ON TV Published on Feb 13, 2015

    one that seems to be hard to find on the net… share & like, make backups ! -fr3 This footage starts shortly after the planes supposedly hit the buildings. The filmographer captures all 3 buildings collapse across the Hudson.

    What makes this footage unique is there are no political or whodunit overtones. There are not conspiracies injected into the story. You have a good view with solid audio from a guy standing on a pier surrounded by loved ones trapped in the buildings.

    They stop the film now and again to get the thoughts of the filmographer as he was filming. It is heart wrenching to hear the common sense type statements normal people should have been asking themselves and our representatives about this event.

    This is a MUST see. It was not aired on any network news program. It contains lots of bomb detonation sounds and smoke..

  2. erdoshk says:

    Truth will set us all free, and now it is the right time for it. Wonderful videos and posts here. I am thankful and grateful to all.

  3. Tracy says:

    Jean & Friends,

    Just sharing information — there are so many unanswered questions, so many end-roads, logic seems to take a diversion when you question many things about the 9-11/Twin Towers & Pentagon stories.

    1] 9/11 CNN Pentagon Report – NO PLANE – Only Aired Once ~
    > (58 seconds)

    2] Leaked Video of Cruise Missile Hitting Pentagon on 911 DOWNLOAD & RE UPLOAD ~
    >> (2:59) from The Reformist Club – channel

    3] Missile hit Pentagon on 9 11 Video {Interview opinion by Gordon Duff }
    >>> (5:16)
    ** see article ~

    4] Pentagon Employee Witness Says There Was No Plane on 9-11-2001!
    >>>> (4:33) from its2die4 – channel

    5] Fake 9/11 footage of cruise missile hitting pentagon ~
    {With back and forth comments & links below}

    6] 9/11 Truth: Pentagon Eyewitness Bob Pugh Tells His Story ~
    >> (10:43) from Henry Bloggit – channel


    >> (posted 12-21-13)

    9] —- ** I just threw this link in because I like to look around.

    10] 3-D Holographic Display Using Strontium Barium Niobate ~ ** The technology has/is being perfected on creating holograms, as report by the Army Research Laboratory

    In summary, there are several pro/con videos, articles, etc. about the events of 9-11. As we can see from much of this “data”, that there are so many questions that will “probably never” be answered. Unless visible, audible, and paper-trail PROOF is presented to all Global Peoples by a vetted (inside) source.
    Many cannot fathom that this could have been the most “organized terrorist act” in the history of Earth. They are not willing to look at the vast firsthand interviews, documentaries, news footage, etc. which point in the direction of “pure-evil”. So IMO no matter if the “truth” were starring them in the face, it’s just not something one is able to grasp if one can’t accept it.
    That does not make them less then, it just means they can’t come to terms with this type of diabolical mind-set. (For whatever reasons and no amount of reasoning will change this fact, until they are ready to question for themselves.)

    But on the other hand, it’s very possible because of the vast amount of information; much is loaded with “opinion, by first account view-points, most without hard-evidence”, and no-chain-of-custody-hard-evidence is available that I’m aware of; other than the 9-11Commission Report which has many holes and unanswered questions, along with the “missing 28-pages of evidence that only “particular” elected officials are privy to. It’s also plausible that the “real story” is somewhere in-between truth & fiction. (IMO the key is to follow the money as in K.I.S.S.) And those who are willing to stare down the face of “pure-evil” will never stop the conspiracy mind-set because they are willing to go there to the “dark-side” because they have overcome the “Ego mind field” faced their fears and have a desire to live in truth and not B.S.
    (I’m not saying that there are not those who have become fanatics about the conspiracies, if one doesn’t keep discernment and a rational mind at the forefront of deliberations to separate fact from fictions).

    I bid you love & peace, be open to the unexpected miracles that abound.

    • Jean says:

      Tracy, I am so tired tonight, that all I can say is I don’t want us to get stuck on this issue. We need to get it before the American people in any way we can. I’m becoming convinced it is the ‘key’ that will unlock our prison door. After we open the door, we can – and I believe we will – easily resolve this issues. This is not to negate your efforts, which are very important, but I’m trying to focus on the larger picture – stopping the death and destruction!
      Hugs, ~Jean

  4. I recommend listening to retired senior flight attendant Rebekah Roth’s analysis of the planes … phone calls … passenger lists … and flight attendant training for confronting hijack situations. Her book is flying off the shelves. “METHODICAL ILLUSIONS”.

    We have not had a breakthrough in evidence and analysis such as Rebekah Roth provides in several years. Her analysis goes deeply into what happened to the planes and passengers.

    Now back to the tiresome task of debunking Fetzer about “no planes”:


    9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory
    Holograms and other nonsense





    • Jean says:

      Okay, this may be so, and it’s the first time I’ve heard it all — still learning and open to these ideas . . . but what about the Pentagon? Hugs, ~Jean

      • The Facebook links can only be accessed once one is logged into a Facebook account. Sorry.

        Citizens Investigation Team did a fairly thorough investigation of the Pentagon attack.
        Here is their 81 minute video:

        • Jean says:

          Ed, I’m also going to copy your personal email to me: Yes, absolutely there were planes. Too many angles photographed to fake them all. Original videos need to be gathered, as some of the ‘road runner cutout’ scenes have been doctored to make the point that planes could not do that (make a clean entry without destroying the plane).

          Perhaps they were specially tasked drones which could account for the ‘impossible speed’ and clean penetration (hardened leading edges and nose).

          And my question in response to you is this; Did most people at this time commonly know of drones?

          Then, you are saying the actual planes with the passengers – did not hit the towers?

          Thanks and hugs,

          • Then, you are saying the actual planes with the passengers – did not hit the towers?
            Thanks and hugs,

            That seems the most likely scenario–that special drones were substituted for the passenger planes–some time after the transponders were turned off. Interesting that the transponders were turned off while the aircraft were in ‘blind zones’–not detectable on the radar. This left a perfect opportunity to substitute the drones for the passenger planes.

          • Jean says:

            Ed, also, allow me to share that I have already published the Rebekah Roth interview, and I expect many if ny readers have already listened to it Hugs, ~Jean

      • Black box data was posted by NTSB and analyzed by Pilots for 9-11 Truth. The flight data establishes the angle of attack, altitude, speed and this data is contradicted by eyewitnesses. NTSB altitude data makes it impossible for the plane to have hit the Pentagon as the altitude is shown as over 600 feet above sea level.

        The plane (757) did not hit the building.

        It takes a bit of time to cover all these materials. Personally, I think our strategies should focus upon Building 7 and AE911TRUTH’s controlled demolition proofs. The Pentagon takes much longer to research. If you have the time, go for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.