US ‘Helped Israel Build Hydrogen Bomb’ – Nuclear Blackmail – Israel’s Constant Pushing for War With Iran – Israel Is a Threat to U.S. Troops In Theater – The Samson Option – Traitors In the U.S. Congress – Israel is the “Number One Threat to World Peace”

Source: Abel Danger
Sunday, February 15, 2015

Thanks to whomever suggested this. I’m sorry, but I just can’t remember 🙂 Abel Danger’s work is tough and to the point. In the beginning, several years ago when I explored some of the dark, ugly side into which they delve, I had real difficulty with digesting it, but over time it has become easier for me to deal with. ~J

US ‘Helped Israel Build Hydrogen Bomb’ – Nuclear Blackmail – Israel’s Constant Pushing for War With Iran – Israel Is a Threat to U.S. Troops In Theater – The Samson Option – Traitors In the U.S. Congress – Israel is the “Number One Threat to World Peace”

Israel in the news:

Conceding to a federal lawsuit, the US government agreed to release a 1987 Defense Department report detailing US assistance to Israel in its development of a hydrogen bomb, which skirted international standards.

The 386-page report, “Critical Technology Assessment in Israel and NATO Nations,” likens top Israeli nuclear facilities to the Los Alamos and Oak Ridge National Laboratories that were key in the development of US nuclear weaponry. Israelis are “developing the kind of codes which will enable them to make hydrogen bombs. That is, codes which detail fission and fusion processes on a microscopic and macroscopic level,” said the report, the release of which comes before Israeli Prime Minister Binjamin Netanyahu’s March 3 speech in front of the US Congress in which he will oppose any deal that allows Iran’s legal nuclear program to persist.

“I am struck by the degree of cooperation on specialized war making devices between Israel and the US,” Roger Mattson, a formerly of the Atomic Energy Commission’s technical staff, said of the report, according to Courthouse News.

The report’s release earlier this week was initiated by a Freedom of Information Act request made three years ago by Grant Smith, director of the Washington think tank Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy. Smith filed a lawsuit in September in order to compel the Pentagon to substantially address the request.

“It’s our basic position that in 1987 the Department of Defense discovered that Israel had a nuclear weapons program, detailed it and then has covered it up for 25 years in violation of the Symington and Glenn amendments, costing taxpayers $86 billion,” Smith said during a hearing in late 2014 before Judge Tanya Chutkan in US District Court for the District of Columbia.

Smith described in his federal court complaint how those federal laws were violated by the US in the midst of Israel’s budding nuclear program.

“The Symington Amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 prohibits most U.S. foreign aid to any country found trafficking in nuclear enrichment equipment or technology outside international safeguards,” Smith wrote.

“The Glenn Amendment of 1977 calls for an end to U.S. foreign aid to countries that import nuclear reprocessing technology.”

In November, Judge Chutkan asked government lawyers resistant to the report’s release why it had taken years for the government to prepare the report for public consumption.

“I’d like to know what is taking so long for a 386-page document. The document was located some time ago,” Chutkan said, according to Courthouse News Service. “I’ve reviewed my share of documents in my career. It should not take that long to review that document and decide what needs to be redacted.”

The government’s representatives in the case — Special Assistant US Attorney Laura Jennings and Defense Department counsel Mark Herrington — initially said confidentiality agreements required a “line by line” review of the Defense Department’s report. They later shifted, arguing that its release is optional and not mandatory, as “diplomatic relations dictate that DoD seeks Israel’s review.” Smith and the US agreed that the government would redact sections of the report on NATO countries, though the passages on Israel remain intact.

“The capability of SOREQ [Soreq Nuclear Research Center] to support SDIO [Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, or “Star Wars”] and nuclear technologies is almost an exact parallel of the capability currently existing at our National Laboratories,” said the report, written by the Institute for Defense Analysis for the Department of Defense.

“SOREQ and Dimona/Beer Sheva facilities are the equivalent of our Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Oak Ridge National Laboratories…[and have] the technology base required for nuclear weapons design and fabrication.”

The report’s authors Edwin Townsley and Clarence Robinson found that Israel to had Category 1 capability regarding its anti-tactical ballistic missile and “Star Wars” weapons programs.

“As far as nuclear technology is concerned the Israelis are roughly where the U.S. [w]as in the fission weapon field in about 1955 to 1960,” the report said. “It should be noted that the Israelis are developing the kind of codes which will enable them to make hydrogen bombs.”

In a statement on the report’s release, Smith said Thursday, “Informal and Freedom of Information Act release of such information is rare. Under two known gag orders — punishable by imprisonment — U.S. security-cleared government agency employees and contractors may not disclose that Israel has a nuclear weapons program.”

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s planned address before the US Congress was controversially arranged by Republican leadership without consultation of congressional Democrats or the White House.

The speech will occur weeks before Netanyahu will seek reelection, and is to center around his opposition to any agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, a deal the US — while levying heavy sanctions on Tehran — has pursued despite protests from its preeminent ally in the Middle East, Israel.

Tehran’s nuclear program is legal under the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which Israel is one of the few United Nations members that is not a signatory.

The report is here:

US helped Israel with H-bomb – 1980s report declassified

Michael Collins Piper Final Judgment Lecture [JFK assassination, Mossad/Jewish connections]

US ‘helped Israel build hydrogen bomb’: declassified report

Michael Collins Piper: FINAL JUDGEMENT lecture [Mossad connection to JFK Conspiracy] 

This entry was posted in Financial/economic information, Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption, Political. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to US ‘Helped Israel Build Hydrogen Bomb’ – Nuclear Blackmail – Israel’s Constant Pushing for War With Iran – Israel Is a Threat to U.S. Troops In Theater – The Samson Option – Traitors In the U.S. Congress – Israel is the “Number One Threat to World Peace”

  1. Ri-chard says:

    Anyone heard of this report coming from FAUX News and Friends? Or any others owned and operated by the Jews?

  2. Steve-0 says:

    1. The Obama administration is engaging with Iran in order to realize a deal regarding Iran’s nuclear program.

    2. Israel’s Netanyahu administration is determined to scuttle the deal, and so Netanyahu apparently asks speaker Boehner of the U.S. House of Representatives to allow him to address a joint session of congress prior to a vote on a bill which would apply penalties to Iran in the form of more sanctions if Iran fails to make a deal with the U.S. regarding Iran’s nuclear program by the conclusion of the talks. This is a slap in the face from Netanyahu to Obama, since it is clear that the Israelis don’t actually want the U.S.-Iran deal to succeed. It is also a highly unprecedented move for a foreign leader to start playing party politics in such a brazen manner and interfering with the U.S. legislative process. Also made clear by this debacle is the extent to which AIPAC has placed Congress into its pocket, especially on the republican side.

    3. The Obama administration response has been interesting. First the administration let it be known that Israels supports passage of this bill (the bill which would apply more sanctions to Iran if a deal is not reached) only because they expect it to ruin the chances of a successful deal, not because (as Netanyahu will say to congress) the Israelis expect it to promote a successful deal. The Obama administration highlighted Netanyahu’s duplicity by leaking to the media statements made by Israeli intelligence that they hope the bill passes because they believe it will prevent a deal from being reached. Publishing off the record communications is a very offensive and unfriendly thing to do, but should be expected following Netanyahu’s behavior toward Obama’s efforts in an Iran nuke deal.

    4. The U.S. leadership also chose to respond by releasing into the public record information from a classified report on Israeli and NATO partners’ nuclear and technological capabilities. This was done in response to a federal lawsuit, and is another obvious example of something that friendly nations don’t do to each other typically. The redacted report is redacted everywhere, except where it concerns Israeli facilities and technologies, so it’s is a pretty pointed response which also brings to light the very significant issue of US and Israeli collaboration on nuclear weapons technology. This is significant for many reasons, not least of which has to do with evidence of nukes used during the arracks if September 11.

    5. Netanyahu and the Pentagon retaliate against Obama by re-releasing information about Benghazi and about O’s birth certificate and presumed lack of eligibility for the office of POTUS.
    Interesting events, to be sure. Obama’s refusal to take orders from Israel is a clear deviation from the historical norm. If Jeb gets elected I suspect a return to business as usual, because it takes gumption to oppose the Israelis when they have bought off your government reps via AIPAC.

  3. Debbie says:

    No doubt they wanted JFK dead:


  4. Ilex says:

    I think this just about says it all.

    , to which Israel is one of the few United Nations members that is not a signatory. I would guess this means that Israel does not have to comply with any rules or regulations? Talk about NO accountability. This should have never been allowed to happen.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.