So – apparently ANY order by a judge is a “Royal Order” that must be obeyed no matter it’s Constitutionality or lack of it. The same goes for police officers, AND they themselves may issue citizens unconstitutional orders as this one did. (This cop was “out fishing” and caught an innocent citizen, whom he immediately acted to make APPEAR to be guilty of something, ANYthing) And when, exactly, was it that someone suspended the Constitution again? I missed that somehow). So – it seems that within a courtroom the judge and police officers are not in any way constrained by the Constitution. Are administrative Law courtrooms (Maritime Law, Corporate Law, Common Law, etc.) yet another “Constitution Free Zone”? THIS one certainly appears to be. In fact I guess it’s a Constitution-free CITY; maybe COUNTY. That cop’s handshake with the Corporate Press was interesting too. SO – the complicit press can take all the pictures they want; free Americans cannot take ANY. Incidentally, when was that first officer charged with kidnapping, and when is HIS trial? Opening the car door without permission violated the Fourth Amendment with malice aforethought, and dragging the man OUT of the car. Did the officer ever actually ARREST him? I don’t recall hearing that.
Here – let’s try it line by line:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or 1) abridging the freedom of speech, or of 2) the press; or 3 )the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and 4)to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
1)His freedom of speech was repeatedly being abridged as, in attempting to point out the illegal behaviors of the officer who kidnapped him, the officer at the court, and the judge, as they continually told him to “sit down and shut up” and refused to listen, much less act on his words – all legal all Constitutional); 2). the people with videocams/cellphones were attempting to record the TRUTH of what happened in that courtroom, and the police, while allowing the complicit Press to retain and to use their cameras, TOOK his cell phone (which contains much personal information in addition to audio-visual records of the court) by force and those of others, violently, without warrants, but instead on the judge’s illegal verbal orders; 3) the People WERE peaceably assembled, in the audience – until the cops attacked (again). ALL of their attempts to communicate (aside from asking them NOT to tase him, and the cops had NO reason to – they weren’t violent, and Tasers, which are too often deadly, are NOT supposed to be punishment or coercive but DEFENSIVE in place of a firearm! I saw nothing even remotely equivalent to a gun – except on the cops. Not did I see any violence from anyone but the police, and much of this abuse was happening after the judge abandoned the bench and the room!
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, 1) unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or 2) public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, 3 )liberty, 3) or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
1).Well, no Grand Jury there; not even much of a poor one; 2). I’d like to know just WHAT this “danger” was, danger being the only possible excuse remaining, nor was there any “due process” of ANY sort – only the illegal orders of police and the judge; 3). I doubt that the cell phones with cameras being taken had any purpose other than removing evidence proving this judge’s and the cop’s illegal behavior. Incidentally, when he was pulled over at first, the officer had, apparently, NO legitimate reason, and again, apparently, it appears that it was the officer’s intent from the beginning to illegally make up a charge against an innocent man who was under NO obligation either to open his vehicle (and thus himself to attack, which is what happened when the officer BROKE INTO THE CAR). As for any charges for lack of obedience to the cop, there’s no such requirement, and if there was such a requirement it would be illegal! As far as I know, no one is obligated to obey the orders of a cop unless the officer is in hot pursuit – and NOT of a promotion and a raise!
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and 1) to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; (which the cop illegally refused to do, but still FORCED his way into the car illegally, and took the man CAPTIVE; (he was arrested on an untrue “obstruction” charge – obstructing WHAT? Exercising our rights is NOT “obstructing”; if anything the COP was guilty of it!) to be confronted with the witnesses against him (which not only never happened, the most vital and the most true possible witness – his cell phone – was in constant danger of being broken or taken and “lost”, or erased, or otherwise destroyed); to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor (This never even occurred to the judge, the cops or the prosecutor as far as I could see), and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense. (He had none, was offered NO help in summoning one he already employed or assistance in finding one. The judge repeatedly insisted he HAD to have “an adviser”, but I recall no such law; we may represent ourselves if we choose, especially if we are never given the opportunity to hire or summon someone.
14th Amendment (rather long, this is a summary): Four principles were asserted in the text of the 14th amendment. They were:
1.State and federal citizenship for all persons regardless of race both born or naturalized in the United States was reaffirmed.
(Though his ID was never asked for at the scene that I heard)
2.No state would be allowed to abridge the “privileges and immunities” of citizens.
(This man’s rights – his privileges and immunities were indeed violated, repeatedly: he should have been immune to a manufactured “charge” that really wasn’t a crime at all but the attempted exercise of his rights under the Constitution; it was also his right to drive his own vehicle without being attacked by a bored or promotion-hungry cop), which he was doing safely, without being stopped by a cop on a fishing expedition who doesn’t know or maybe care about the Law of the Land).
3.No person was allowed to be deprived of life, liberty,or property without “due process of law”
(He was deprived of both his liberty, with the addition of illegal abuse by the cop, AND after repeated attempts, of his property, the cell phone containing evidence to prove his own behavior to be legal and cop’s behavior Illegal).
4.No person could be denied “equal protection” of the laws.
As far as I could see he had NO protection under the law!
I’m no lawyer, and neither was that cop – nor were those in the courtroom! This was a concerted, illegal, unconstitutional ATTACK by a “legal” system that is out of control and making up it’s own laws and rules as it goes! People are constantly being attacked by police now, foring them to choose between preserving their own lives against illegal attack by badge-wearing thugs, or getting beaten, possibly to death, like Kelly Thomas in Fullerton, for “contempt of cop”, aka “Refusing to kneel and bow and obey any and all orders a cop or a judge gives whether those orders are legal or not. Obedience, however is ALWAYS considered agreement with any charges they choose to bring!
America is almost gone, and fascist Amerika is on the rise. This is NOT why my entire family (except my baby sister) joined in times of war when we were told we were needed – NOT drafted. There were no draftees in my family as far back as I know.
My son was smarter that I was, than my family was. I’m still proud of them, but they loved their country maybe too much and refused to see or hear the truth, WE did; I joined too.
Our courts use Corporate Law, in which words have altered or changing meanings, and guilt is not necessary for conviction; only confusion, the lies and obfuscation of lawyers, and a complicit judge. Anyone can be made to look and sound guilty by a skilled lawyer, and the JOB of lawyers is TO WIN THEIR CASES. Innocence or guilt are irrelevant! In Common Law, which America was SUPPOSED to operate under, if there is no victim, there is no crime. So who was the victim here? ALL OF US!