Jon Rappoport has come at the whole issue of ebola from a new angle, questioning the existence of the virus itself. Is it real? If so, where’s the proof?
It turns out that he is not alone in asking about the existence of the ebola virus, and what’s more, others had also questioned the existence of the swine flu virus. And for some time, there have even been demands from medical “authorities” for evidence of the existence of any medically relevant – vaccine – viruses and those have all gone unanswered.
The issues surrounding vaccines is growing by the day. For those with open minds and a scientific bent, this is a fascinating time. Medline information on vaccine problems is pouring out, but the questions are now going much deeper: Are vaccine viruses real?
This is a time that challenges everyone to research and discuss and learn as much as they can. We may, in fact, be facing the end of the vaccine paradigm. Either the pharmaceutical industry will succeed in mandating their products regardless of the increasing numbers of people who are avoiding them or those who have already shown they would be injured by them, or scientists’ reports, or else the problems flooding out now about vaccines may swamp and overturn the whole technology.
What is happening with vaccination is a life or death issue, a scientific issue to investigate, and an historical turning point in medicine that could change it toward full corporate/government control over people’s bodies or a renaissance in medical learning led by independent scientists questioning everything, unafraid to look deeper into conventional medicines’ most deadly “threat” – viruses – and its “holiest of holy’s – vaccines.
Based on what the material below indicates, we are in for interesting and important times, with mankind’s well-being driving a great deal of scientific revelations and even whistle blowing.
“Here is my FOIA request verbatim:
“This is a request for published records, data, studies, electron microscope photographs, work notes, and internal correspondence relating to and describing, in detail, the direct isolation of the Ebola virus from human beings.
“Note: My request does not seek information on this subject which is derived from antibody tests, PCR tests, or virus cultured and grown outside the human body. Nor does it seek electron microscope photographs which are, in fact, simulations or the result of computer models.”
“I am, however, seeking electron microscope photos of diseased human tissue.”
It can’t be found in the body. Or it can’t be found in sufficient quantity to cause disease.
“Its presence and influence can only be inferred through faulty and/or deceptive means.
“That’s why, in email correspondence with me, David Rasnick, PhD, announced this shocking finding:
“I have examined in detail the literature on isolation and Ems [EM: electron microscope pictures] of both Ebola and Marburg viruses. I have not found any convincing evidence that Ebola virus (and for that matter Marburg) has been isolated from humans. There is certainly no confirmatory evidence of human isolation.”
“Rasnick obtained his PhD from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and spent 25 years working with proteases (a class of enzymes) and protease inhibitors. He is the author of the book, The Chromosomal Imbalance Theory of Cancer. He was a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel of South Africa.
“Unless and until I see convincing evidence to the contrary, Rasnick’s statement is a knockout punch.”
“That means the whole Ebola “epidemic” was and is a hoax.”
It gets worse.
In terms of ebola and hoaxes, what the WHO has done to “science” and “evidence” in order to raise the numbers, is very much like what the CDC did with the swine flu numbers. It is an incredible joke on the public.
“JON RAPPOPORT: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?
“SHARYL ATTKISSON: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it and, in the end, no broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.”
“Do you want the staggering capper on this foul tale? Roughly three weeks after Attkisson’s Swine Flu revelations appeared in print, the CDC, obviously in great distress over the exposure, decided to double down.The best lie to tell would be a huge lie.
“Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 .” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon)
“22 million cases of Swine Flu in America. Roughly 1 out every 15 Americans came down with Swine Flu. What??”
Stefan Lanka had done the same thing with the H1N1 virus that Rappoport has just done now with ebola – and with WHO/pharmaceutical industry plans to mandate its H1N1 hoax-of-a-vaccine hanging over everyone’s heads at the time for Lanka, and with all Americans facing the mandating of all vaccines for Rappoport.
From William Engdahl: Swine Flu/Tuberculosis
“Broxmeyer cites my article of June 2009 which appeared in Kopp Exclusive entitled “Sarkozy’s Secret Plan for Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccination.” He notes, “Engdahl plainly stated there that, “The only problem with the Swine Flu (H1N1) Vaccine, is that to date, neither WHO nor the US Government’s Center for Diseases Control (CDC) have succeeded to isolate, photograph with an electron microscope, or chemically classify the H1N1 Influenza A virus.” Furthermore there was no scientifically published evidence that French virologists have done so either. Therefore, mentioned Engdahl, “To mandate a vaccination for a putative (supposed or assumed to exist) disease that has never been characterized, is dubious to say the least.”
“Broxmeyer continued, “Engdahl had done his homework. When questioned regarding the electron pictograph of H1N1 that the CDC recently came up with on their website, he revealed his source, German virologist Dr Stefan Lanka, an expert on the documentation of viruses, attesting to the fact that the H1N1 picture was bogus. The virologist wrote that he had “written the CDC many times as to who made the H1N1 photo’s and whether they where scientifically documented as to chemical characteristics and other properties.” There was never any reply. He concluded “If CDC refuses to cite the source of the photos, they are fake.” Worse yet he said “The photos are merely liposomes, microscopic artificial sacs whose walls are a double layer of phospholipids, used to carry substances such as drugs, vaccines, and enzymes to specific cells or organs of the body. These have been artificially presented by a process where chick embryos or cell cultures are killed, reduced and then centrifuged with some solvent, to then, in a vacuum, be nanofiltered.” As if this wasn’t enough, the virologist testified that “Such a structure has never been characterized in either an organism or its fluids. Furthermore, if there wasn’t for the centrifuge/solvent/nanofiltration manipulation, not to mention the precipitation procedure, such particles could never be presented under the electron microscope. In conclusion, without the isolation of the H1N1, there is no H1N1 infecting virus”
“Engdahl wasn’t finished. “Even more bizarre is the admission by the US Government’s Food and Drug Administration, an agency responsible for the health and safety of its citizens, that the ‘test’ approved for premature release to test for H1N1 is not even a proven test.
“More to the point”, continues F. William Engdahl, “there is no forensic evidence in any of the deaths reported to date that has been presented that proves scientifically that any single death being attributed to H1N1 Swine Flu virus was indeed caused by such a virus.” [Emphasis added.]
Are we being hoaxed about diseases, and continuously?
What goes well with hoaxed viruses? Corruption. Engdahl did a stellar piece on that as well, and who is profiting even now by fear of “flu.” The H1N1 vaccine, by the way, is inside the seasonal flu vaccine being mandated to nursing staff, to all children in NY, and as many people as possible are being coerced into receiving this corruption creation.
“The man with the nickname “Dr Flu”, Professor Albert Osterhaus, of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam Holland has been named by Dutch media researchers as the person at the center of the worldwide Swine Flu H1N1 Influenza A 2009 pandemic hysteria. Not only is Osterhaus the connecting person in an international network that has been described as the Pharma Mafia, he is THE key advisor to WHO on influenza and is intimately positioned to personally profit from the billions of euros in vaccines allegedly aimed at H1N1.”
Back to the viruses themselves. Stefan Lanka didn’t just question the H1N1, he is questioning all “medically relevant” viruses.
“Dr. Stefan Lanka, virologist and molecular biologist, is internationally mostly known as an “AIDS dissident” (and maybe “gentechnology dissident”) who has been questioning the very existence of “HIV” since 1994. In the past years, however, he stumbled over a breathtaking fact: Not even ONE of the (medically relevant) viruses has ever been isolated; there is no proof of their existence. Actually, Dr. Lanka has already stated three years ago, in the almost “legendary” Zenger´s interview: “So for a long time I studied virology, from the end to the beginning, from the beginning to the end, to be absolutely sure that there was no such thing as HIV. And it was easy for me to be sure about this because I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses — as well as other viruses which are claimed to be very dangerous — in fact do not exist at all.” So he was thoroughly reading the literature on those “other viruses” again, and after he could still not find any paper which would provide the evidence, he encouraged people not to BELIEVE him but to ask the institutes and authorities themselves. This has actually taken place, mostly initiated by mothers. The responses were revealing. In September 2001 the German book “Impfen – Völkermord im dritten Jahrtausend?” (Vaccination – Genocide in the third millennium?) by Stefan Lanka and Karl Krafeld was published in which they state that there is still no proof of any (medically relevant) virus.
This movement (klein-klein-aktion ~ many little actions/steps) has a German website:http://www.klein-klein-aktion.de which I have taken (and translated) all the following texts from.
“For almost one year we have been asking authorities, politicians and medical institutes after the scientific evidence for the existence of such viruses that are said to cause disease and therefore require “immunization”. After almost one year we have not received even one concrete answer which provides evidence for the existence of those “vaccination viruses”. The conclusion is inevitable that our children are still vaccinated on the basis of scientific standards of the 18th and 19th century. In the 19th century Robert Koch demanded in his generally accepted postulates evidence of the virus in order to prove infection; at Koch´s time this evidence couldn´t be achieved directly by visualization and characterization of the viruses, because adequate technology wasn´t available at that time. Methods of modern medicine have profoundly changed over the past 60 years, in particular by the invention of the electron microscope. And still all these viruses we get immunized against have never been re-examined using this technology?”