January 6, 2017, Evening News

‘No one expected the collapse of the Soviet Union” stated by PCR in his article, What is Mr. Kissinger Up to in Russia  and as stated above in the video by Joseph.

According to a document I’m publishing below, I believe this statement to be incorrect, the operative paragraph from PCR being the one below:

Reagan had no intention of dominating the Soviet Union or collapsing it. Unlike Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama, he was not controlled by neoconservatives. Reagan fired and prosecuted the neoconservatives in his administration when they operated behind his back and broke the law.

Does PCR have this right? Does he actually know what was going at that time? How many actually knew? Did Reagan, himself, even know what was going on, or as I have read elsewhere, after the assassination attempt did he (perhaps informally) abdicate his foreign policy to his Vice-President, GWB, who behaved clandestinely and executed plans to bring down the Soviet Union?  The government document I’m presenting (below) from a whistleblower (along with three others documents —not presented here, all available in several places on the internet) strongly states with much proof a very different view from the one PCR expresses. 

I invite everyone to take time now to read it and at the very least to develop a deeper understanding of who and what actually took down the Soviet Union, all of which led to 9/11. (Surely, surely, Putin knows this? — and because he understands how sovereignty must be achieved, he has remained silent, and I believe he will continue to remain silent — unless it impinges on his oath to protect his country and his people. . . )

As far as stating that Putin is a part of a ‘deep state’, a faction in Russia that believes in preserving Russia at all costs, I can’t agree with this, either. It may be the basis of some of Putin’s knowledge and background just like his experiences with the KGB/FSB and as a lawyer are— and from what little Joseph shares with us, it doesn’t sound like it is an unhealthy view, but as I see it Putin clearly demonstrates over and over again in his words and deeds that he understands what sovereignty in all its huge ramifications means, both personal and national.

Sovereignty is what this larger battle is all about! Nothing else! It’s time we recognized it!

Why do we always have to give something a complex label? We all have to have experiences in our lives from which we learn, but why must we label people’s views when they may be simply a partial result of these experiences? When we do this, do we not deny someone’s own path to sovereignty? Why can’t we just understand what morality and integrity is — and begin to accept it and call it for what it is?

You know, the truth is always simple and easily understood by everyone!

Read all about the take down of the Soviet Union on pages 8-28, Summary of Findings in the following Document:Part 1:
https://app.box.com/s/s0qcwvk14l m2co2job3q

 * * * 

BOMBSHELL! Kissinger explains why neocons (not Russia) hacked the election for Trump, by Kevin Barrett on January 5, 2017

Why are we being bombarded with mainstream propaganda telling us “Russia hacked the election for Trump”?

To figure out what’s really going on, we need to read between the lines. And every so often, a mainstream article inadvertently offers us a glimpse of the man behind the curtain.

Such is the case with the recent Forbes article “Trump’s Election Spoils Putin’s Narrative To The Russian People.” I have not done a background check on the attributed author, Paul Roderick Gregory, because I don’t need to. Clearly this guy is playing the neocon-Straussian game of writing on two levels: at the surface, spouting his team’s propaganda line for the masses; while esoterically dropping hints about the “deep game” for his fellow sophisticates.

The neocons are chosenites at best, Satanists at worst. Their achilles heel is hubris: the heartfelt belief that they are smarter than anybody else, and therefore the only ones who can read between the lines.

So put on your thinking caps, dear readers, and consider the implications of what Kissinger/Gregory are telling us . . . continue reading

 

This entry was posted in Financial/economic information, Illuminati/Terrorism/Corruption, Political. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to January 6, 2017, Evening News

  1. beLIEve says:

    The …..ALLEGED……DNC hack.

    John Mc Afee gave an excellent interview on RT a day or two ago reference the supposed DNC hack.

    Propaganda intended to incite Americans’: John McAfee to RT on ‘Russian hacking’ claims
    https://www.rt.com/usa/372795-mcafee-dnc-hack-propaganda/

    The sloppiness of the alleged DNC hack by itself proves it was not organized by a nation state, and the “utter nonsense” presented as proof of Moscow’s involvement is rather evidence of intelligence agencies being “ignorant and naïve,” John McAfee ……..TOLD…… RT.

    Cybersecurity legend McAfee is one of the modern computer tech pioneers and the developer of the first commercial antivirus program, who has been in the business for the past 50 years. He is also the CEO of MGT Capital Investments, and a former presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party.

    The so-called evidence of the Russian involvement in the hacks not only looks like “the most deceptive propaganda was perpetrated on the American public” but actually proves quite the opposite, McAfee believes.
    Read more
    © RT ‘Surreal echo chamber’: Watch ‘Russia hacked US’ narrative challenged in RT debate

    “In there are four facts which they claim prove that Russia did this hack. It was utter nonsense. The information was number one – Russian language was found in the malware. Number two – a Cyrillic keyboard was used. The forensic science can now tell what type of keyboard was used to develop a piece of a malware,” McAfee told RT.

    “Number three – the compiler, the piece of software that compiles the code so that it can execute, always dated time stamps. The time stamps were in a time zone for the business hours of Moscow and St. Petersburg and other places in Russia and the number four that the IP address pointed to a Russian address.”

    To make it simple for the American audience, McAfee metaphorically explained the situation:

    “Seriously, if Russia declared war on us because we hacked Russia and the head of the CIA and the intelligence committee came to the Congress and they ask him ‘What happened?’ – ‘Oh, well you know we didn’t have time to remove English language, we didn’t have time to move the date stamp, the guy could not use a Chinese keyboard, so we gave him our regular keyboard. And also there was my wife’s birthday so I could not remove the IP address.’”

    “Please, that person would be scheduled for a suicide,” McAfee concluded.

    READ MORE: Clapper: RT reporting on US problems part of ‘multifaceted’ Russian campaign to undermine elections

    Thus, McAfee believes, the whole “Russian hacking” narrative is either “propaganda intended to incite the American people, to anger toward Russia for some reason, or our intelligence community is so ignorant and naïve that they should all be replaced.”

    Cybersecurity specialist believes that based on the presented evidence the hack “cannot possibly be an organized nation-state.”

    “The HACK on the DNC used a piece of MALWARE A YEAR AND A HALF OLD and there have been many updates since then, McAfee said. “This was DONE BY an independent ONE PERSON KID that downloaded the software. Please, this is not an organized hack and CERTAINLY NOT A NATION-STATE that did this.”

  2. Captain says:

    Two of interest – maybe:
    http://veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/2016/12/08/pizzagate-the-real-number-of-child-victims-will-shock-you/
    Captain-Max-Steel-Galactic-Commander-and-Kent-Dunn-Spiritual-Medium-The-Quantum-Shift-Hosted-By-Dr-S … http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eN7r21CnKk

  3. Tracy says:

    Jean, have you seen this article? ~ Title: Is a Prophecy from 1907 About Obama Coming True 5 Days Before Trump Inauguration? = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfI4iZxLlfo (5:24 min) by DAHBOO77 channel; and this additional video ~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHWacCYJUhU (6:35 min) Also links to wiki synopsis of book “Lord of the World” ~
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_the_World; and an actual link to the online book itself ~ https://archive.org/details/lordofworld00bens, or here: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/14021 [I’m only beginning to look at this book] ** The timing of these events & many others in the news most recently is what is important. Thanks for all that you do to keep us informed Jean. I wanted to reach out yesterday about something else on my mind (my epiphany for the reason to “separate church and state”, however I thought better of it as I was having a difficult day and my thoughts were turning into a rant.) Hugs to you ❤

  4. Captain says:

    I think your impressions of Regan are more accurate. He once said about the Presidency, “I don’t know how you can do this job if you were not an actor.” In the Oliver North hearings, he said something about assigning people to jobs and just letting them do their jobs. Seems he did not particulay check into things unless a specific problem came to his attention. He did drink heavily. In Cathy O’Briens book, it comes across that Senior and Cheney’s attitude was that Regan did and said what they wanted him to’. He once scheduled a press conference regarding a new Ameican treasury system. All US News media refused to cover it. Things went downhill for him after that. His Regan Diaries, the bits I’ve seen, are interesting. He was intelligent and observant, but still he did what Bush ordered him to do. His most interesting comment was in (May 1998?) when he mentioned that ‘Wouldn’t it help unite all our countries if we were to learn that there was a threat to us from another world.’ (roughly paraphrased – its on youtube). Not one reporter, however, ever asked what the heck he was talking about. ( Ramtha once mentioned that he was a sincere man, and that he prayed to God for guidance every nigh t…… then some years later Ram asked that all students read Cathy O’ Brien’s book, prior to her speaking at the school, and that kind of altered the image of Regan forever.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s