Published on Jun 29, 2015
Three brief observations that this video brings to my mind:
* * * When I first listened to this video, I thought this story is very complex with lots of guilt to go around.
But if we understand sovereignty and its ‘rules’, the chaos and confusion immediately disappears and the situation quickly becomes very simple and clear.
In 1953, long before we were aware of how the United States goes about creating regime change, the CIA instigated a coup in Iran, putting the brutal Shah in as their proxy dictator. At this moment in time the United States then created the Iranian problem sorely for their own political purposes without respect for Iran’s sovereignty, and according to the rules of sovereignty, the United States is to blame for all that has happened in the ensuing years.
Whatever was going on in Iran, it was none of the United States’ business, and it still isn’t any of their business, unless it affects our United States sovereignty. What happens within Iran, legal — or even illegal — is the responsibility of the Iranian people.
The United States could have chosen to negotiate with Iran over its oil, but that is not how they operated either then or now.
When we understand this, life becomes simple and begins to make sense, and the chaos that has been created in our minds is seen for exactly what it is.
IMPORTANT POINT: THIS IS WHY I BELIEVE RUSSIA AND CHINA, WHO UNDERSTAND SOVEREIGNTY, WILL NEVER INVADE OR EVEN TRY TO CONTROL THE UNITED STATES. WHY WOULD THEY WANT TO TAKE ON THIS COUNTRY, PRESENTLY A MASSIVE BASKET CASE, WHEN THEY ALONG WITH MUCH OF THE REST OF THE WORLD ARE WORKING TOWARDS A PEACEFUL FUTURE.
THIS KIND OF TALK IS NOTHING BUT OLD PARADIGM FEAR MONGERING AND AN ATEMPT TO MANIPULATE US!
WHAT I DO BELIEVE IS THAT THEY WILL HELP AND SUPPORT US (FOR A PRICE) IF/WHEN WE DECIDE TO RETUR TO THE FAMILY OF NATIONS. RUSSIA OFTEN SAYS THIS IN SO MAN WORDS; THEY WANT US AS PARTNERS, BUT AS OF NOW, WE’RE HAVING NONE OF IT.
* * * I’ve often wondered if Bush, soon to be Reagan’s Vice-President was the one who made a deal to ensure Jimmy Carter lost the election in 1980 as a result of the 144-Day Iran Hostage Crisis.
If you are not aware, after the attempted assassination of President Reagan, it is my understanding that he pretty much gave over the control and management of his foreign policy to his Vice-President, George W. Bush, who became our next President. Many say that Bush was actually behind the attempt to assassinate Reagan in order to ascend the throne early. (The information that is public makes this a highly likely scenario.) It was after all time for the Clinton/Bush cabal to make its move on Russia and strip its assets.
None of these ideas surprise me, and I strongly doubt I’m the first person to consider these possibilities. They just seems likely scenarios, — or possibilities to consider, as George Webb would say.
* * * Regarding Trump’s dsire to take down Iran, I’m not surprised. Didn’t he openly and often spoke about this in his election campaign? I wonder if I’m crazy, because it seems people have forgotten this.
Is there a logical reason that Trump could want to both bring down Iran and the Deep State, two very different, really unrelated entities? While I haven’t heard anyone mention this possibility, I think there is, but I’m not prepared to state it here, not yet anyway.