UPDATE: Netanyahu’s Anti-Iran PowerPoint Moment as Trump Wavers and Europe Turns its Back . . . asking the tough question — what do make of this? To be honest, I have shared some recent posts with Joe, but I don’t know if he bothered to read them. I think he should have . . . 🙂 ~J
. . . and . . . this?
Netanyahu cries wolf again: Claims Iran still has nuclear weapons program, but something bigger seems to be up, by Moon of Alabama
I hope you will listen to George’s videos (above), because I totally agree with him concerning Q, but my views come from a very different place. I’ve been studying the energy around this situation for a long time, and I can’t make any sense of it. To me, it is, to say the least, dissonant and dysfunctional.
Today, Q is saying that Yellow Cake Uranium is being processed in Syria, and George gives excellent information why that isn’t likely, and suggests that he and Task Force may have to part ways over this statement. Surely, then, this is serious.
Is Q looking to implement a psy-op, and is he testing the waters for how much the public will buy into? George is not asking that question — yet, but I am. I also doubt very much that he will like it that I’m daring to ask this question, but really, why not? Why shouldn’t I ask it?
As my readers know I would rather ask the tough, tough questions — and answer them — or at least begin to answer them, before they are thrown at me in a negative situation, when I have no response. I may never have to utter a word, but I have the comfort of having prepared myself.
Here is what I’m considering: Is Trump using this Iranian nuclear situation as a means to get into Syria, to somehow go around Russia, and in so doing to take control of the Middle East? Is he using our desires to see the Deep State gone from our lives to distract us from another agenda that I hope my words at least suggest may exist?
I don’t do meta data, but I do read energy, and while I’m sure I don’t have it all correct, I think I can go a long way toward pinpointing a significant problem. I keep finding conflicts in what is being said and done, and I think it is important to note for you what I’m sensing. From there, it is simply up to you to do with it what you will. The ability to read energy comes from the heart, not from the head, which is the place from which the meta data comes that George Webb does so well.
Ideally, we would hopefully combine these energies to get a more complete answer, snd mayer someday we will learn to do just that.
If Trump truly wants peace, wants to stop Iran from illegally developing nuclear weapons, why is this other very negative activity/energy continuing? Surely, he isn’t fooling the Deep State, or even the other nations of the world, so why all these warlike headlines? Is he — along with Q — trying to fool us? Is this more than an attempt to stop Iran; that is, I must ask if this is also an attempt to control the Middle East through going to war in Syria.
None of this makes any sense to me: We here in the United States must continue to endure the machinations of the Deep State, and Trump absolutely has the power to instantly stop it, but apparently this is not going to happen. If it can’t happen, I have to ask why there aren’t any other alternatives to solving the problem besides going to war . . . and it appears attempting to suck Russia into it all. Surely, there are other avenues to pursue! Is this really the way the United States intends to continue doing business in the world — even after Trump undoes the Deep State? I wonder if such twisted machinations are really necessary. He has the perfect opportunity to show us he can do business a different way, a way we have never, ever seen— just do as George suggested!
George has previously asked this question — twice:
* * *
US President Donald Trump’s new national security adviser, John Bolton, says he is considering a “Libya model” to denuclearize North Korea, a model that Pyongyang has singled out in the past as a source of its distrust for Washington.
. . . and . . . if war is to be considered, please note these two posts about Russia’s military capabilities. . . .
“China is ready to become a driving force” in aid and restoration of Syria – as soon as security situation improves . . . now an article like this makes sense.
Mike Pompeo’s first foreign trip as Secretary of State . . . dont know much obout Pompeo’s history? This article supplies it . . . and above all, don’t forget the fact that Rudy Guiliani is now also on the Trump team. Why? Does this fit into a peaceful future? And remember, these are apparently Trump’s decisions.
Rudy Giuliani: A Closer Look at the 9/11 Legend – 911Truth.Org . . .check out the facts on Guiliani’s history.
Israel’s illegal strike in Syria destroyed 200 missiles, killed 11 Iranians according to Syrian state TV . . . why did they bomb Iranians in Syria, if the yellow cake is being produced elsewhere, as George probably very correctly suggests.
Bad choice of words: US wants N. Korea to take irreversible steps to de-nuke, “like Libya” . . . why this attitude?
Pentagon chief Mattis: Direct Israel-Iran conflict ‘very likely’ . . . I can see surgically taking out the sites where Iranians are breaking the law, but why war? Is that the real goal, and if so, WHY?